From knu@idaemons.org  Sun Feb  6 21:05:40 2000
Return-Path: <knu@idaemons.org>
Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18])
	by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEDF3D21
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Feb 2000 21:05:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (pc062023.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.155.62.23])
	by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.1/3.7W 06/01/99) with ESMTP id OAA26520
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:06:15 +0900 (JST)
Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id OAA31042; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:05:44 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <86bt5tioup.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 14:05:50 +0900
From: Akinori "Aki" MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: mail/imap-uw: update to 4.7a

>Number:         16545
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       mail/imap-uw: update to 4.7a
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Feb  6 21:10:04 PST 2000
>Closed-Date:    Mon Feb 14 15:20:21 PST 2000
>Last-Modified:  Mon Feb 14 15:21:23 PST 2000
>Originator:     Akinori "Aki" MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org>
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
Associated I. Daemons
>Environment:

	FreeBSD archon.local.idaemons.org 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #18: Fri Feb  4 20:29:22 JST 2000     root@archon.local.idaemons.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/ARCHON  i386

>Description:

	A patch to update imap-uw from 4.7 to 4.7a, as they UW seemed
to have included the lock-patch plus tiny bug-fix to the new release.

	I separated safegets.[ch] (which I wrote) from mtest.c to
share with my upcoming imap-utils port.


	This update obsolete the PR ports/16483 since the `lock-patch'
is no longer on the fetch list.

>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

begin 644 imap-uw.diff.gz
M'XL("+=JFC@"`VEM87`M=7<N9&EF9@"E&&MSVDCR,ZJ[_]!+J#48]$0")*]3
M)A@G;(SC,F2SNW'*$=+(J`*23A*QO2[^^W6/!`C\K#N7T*.[I]_=TV/7]SP0
MX\49^',[$A<W4AC[U_+0_L$\?\96T#5`$$7Q<=+2R$[AF#F@&:"JEM:Q#!U4
MTS2%>KW^@$_I)/;AA$T`D$BS-+P4T!1%$8Z.0%0;:A/J_'YT),`;.&,W$(5Q
MFH`3SF;,2?TP@/E*22^,K5(N01#?P!\L3H@@9O]9^#%SK9(NM87Z$PB;!!S;
M*0,G9OA`:,F$W^V`M&\3\LLTG".P%"4I?A*D<A(S]FYT;&5:R7/;G\F[-C9^
M@BHU5>X$6=5D=(RBY8Y)4O:30?\V@@IG*8C'@]'XK#OL'V:6D,;B^<?W!=#B
MAD/K#REMH?X8*5K6ZX[[[S]=#/JCPQ(I*<"P.QKW+ZY&@S'!O#2R9!GODF,[
MTHV=3/W@.@T#B;D+;I`,EP*4"G3>(F"IY/ERM)C(<S^.PSAYB@%W"S+@,34:
M'8RIT6CSF!99+@)?G-H85\EE&5M:%_D!DP7H_SF^Z/;&5Z//)W\>EJ34CJ6_
M!2`?G`Q.R83*_<HAR\I]D7J)DL52[I#4GR6/H@O+I5GH_!`C.W6F)$>H/[,8
M0X:N')R-\=>_6+O]R,/$F"2N9+MW4APB%=FN:XT6U'6U87+;1Q].!^^R:,W\
M2>6>?[_KCE"#))3R[V'W]Z6D"""QP/4]9%2/PB05V6T:VTYJH7)'E?O>^1(J
M]]P1QX.+I9S8'KMF:2)]=:;?$//EXN/HHH?PV)'G*4M26:@+P!DY8>#YUXN8
M61@,9-7O??AT-1R]7T+Y[5L83[$<1&?FLR"%9&ICL0#J&MOQ'=SXLQE,&`3V
M'*&YNMR!9537]Q!TWAUV/X\_+.&70R@'83GS@HGVUPT5?4%>D-@L88_)_BM<
M@(/EMT@8(".P%^D4U?`=FY?]9.'/7$PRU".=PF4YEW5XQY++<GGM,%$0HYAE
MT;0PT+FW1"]S"W?7)M[RON3L^"M,7!;)F)NW,@6;.XW+Y@ZK.FZ!T9PX'9`O
M^N/^V1\4E&'W8_^J\+Z&G9QVWX]67Q2Z-:9[00@LA)K@/MZ7J:U@MW&-=4-=
M0QYVYC6*MV;>T+`#=2RM::GMK-D66_.&O-B;54M7+:-=[,T&M6:#8B@.CPVH
MKKI05ILU.(1VTV/*9*)WVIU.6S=U8V+8+5-SW;:FX'M'$$>#O_N/K02UT]+:
M1E.H;[&V-Q2Z.G$['5N;*,BMI7=:CMW6FJXS40U393JNW.9M%YF;JMDQ#:S<
M+;VWRYXH55.;Z,R=&,SQF,<F>A/-:)H>PY_7UK$<=PQXR`(M431-+\KB?62C
MCN&Y6D=#*M-6/-3=:+<4YJCVI(7BVI[S?!*L2]W9B>`&\51*;"A*X^F"9P:H
MH)B6HN"%QK<?RXS"JM$B@$]."KBY*6U+URU5R;9Z2A"EH?"]F_>Z^AL_<&8+
ME\%O2>KZH31]^^]M8(REO`,M4_^7IF7(_N1]ZK2GX^'Y:?\,]F4DQ2M)L1TX
MX&!OPI;@?=V0?#O(*#AJ?Z5V-?M$TAK<(Q:RI?M13@V`G:OZB\=ID:I1$-H`
M4CZHK58"3A#I(@[@[//IZ0$'+8M<"$RMKQIAF-%$9QIG+/<N@[U:@<T^$>Q=
M*GL[3'+VN(80"'Y=*DR?"MGTQ528_D^I,'U-*O`\>#(8!T\:Q\L)I?&G:&_R
M?!?QT+A=BM(0-XXABL0.J"I6LX/7P^'TP:IB(]2MIFEI^J81-C7:SOB=MC/<
M(L"/PLBU^$-S^:/I$D8D!3=[\&I`Y+J6ON`FVHVX:@IV6\U2^-R,39)T>[B*
M=W-R.7I:PP4=2^WD"[A:)DY8=7XGO[]6<KLHN?Z$Y!U_4+SS?227K.I<M-I:
MNZ37PPS_CELW5'IRKS?^Z[S_G<!\%T24.*CT-G@._9Y-"\T&G@'PKAIK9K@U
M6B6N$WW71?YJ0:7:ZYT.^F=CG$-JP(%2B.@2(6J$YGQK((89=D6#J-/C#(<V
M/\<-UBF/C.LO,]Z0;\E8*RV%%AF<-3K^YB=.]L;GCNPU]IR.IF7OR3S-H4%`
M;RN%B1,4.L#_S16OC?;6HZRY(=N.PH$42C03]0[H7/;*FF9/U1Y[L:893U]^
MX-2H#J@4]!=K^L'!LV49K:V#I\8W+XWGW';Q9.YVLMJA(AS:=Z"9-%)A^2BM
M3/A.U>:+>)\D97%;5`U+PU9BYO0DUS3H@&#FAR,1?H:^"[3#+1*HTCXT&E_T
M<13>Q\V$V?/:P8HFBL-YE$+>3^?)=2-[2V_3#1$%F6=G=1;BW.RRR>*:L,\T
M95SZ+_S1UFO[`8FYCNTY8$@"/_7MF?]/-HSOR[O-8F7PCI\-JZD5>@6>!>A$
MM.I2L-G[5]E9WH)F>;H-RS(6887)89.MY2Q)T8+^K</P<(D'&?1=$@8)I"%,
MZ<#O>R[SD@;8@0LWTSN8WQ')#)P0>05X0H_I$(+T4S8G4ZD)D?:&UJ$F:VBY
M_O!R,'AZ::T&)FL=']D_-O@?#0PS/.M^5;[!(4X#TA[.!SFN@%4S+,X*-9B@
MEC\.UC1TD.)C!N9D-<438J,LE2F&)+.MZPWLRFW=:.`^P;,K7Q$M4LRN\M>>
M'>RE$$8L0,.#(/_O"OK(#NX@83&ZX1MGAPNI_J_HC'O%@I]LAHN@^BM:^@`]
M"=T[1-&#I]H2?\]E')HLUM<C64;\NHF,"+?F,0(L"QR>F,)H0"/Z%8O-+%9D
04)C$T,*E\%]D2&.Z,1,``-<C
`
end

-- 
                            /
                           /__  __
                          / )  )  ) )  /
Akinori "Aki" MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  <knu@idaemons.org>

"If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice."

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Akinori "Aki" MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/16545: mail/imap-uw: update to 4.7a
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 14:49:36 +0900

 At Mon, 07 Feb 2000 14:05:50 +0900,
 Akinori Aki MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
 > 	This update obsolete the PR ports/16483 since the `lock-patch'
                            ^s
 > is no longer on the fetch list.
 
 		*		*		*
 
 In addition, what pkg/MESSAGE says seems obsolete today because we
 already have the following entries in /etc/pam.conf.
 
 other   auth    required        pam_unix.so     try_first_pass
 other   account required        pam_unix.so     try_first_pass
 
 But this only applies to recent STABLE or CURRENT systems, so changing
 "you need to add .." to "you may need to add .." would be nice.
 
 Apply the patch below.
 
 --- pkg/MESSAGE	Wed Dec 22 21:21:44 1999
 +++ pkg/MESSAGE	Mon Feb  7 14:43:19 2000
 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
 -If you compiled in PAM authentication support then you need to add the
 -following lines to /etc/pam.conf:
 +If you compiled in PAM authentication support then you may need to add
 +the following lines to /etc/pam.conf:
  
  imap	auth	required	pam_unix.so			try_first_pass
  imap	account	required	pam_unix.so			try_first_pass
 
 
 Then unskilled users can use imap-uw using the default authentication
 type without editing /etc/pam.conf, while skilled users get to know
 how to to set the authentication type which best suits their policy.
 
 -- 
                             /
                            /__  __
                           / )  )  ) )  /
 Akinori "Aki" MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  <knu@idaemons.org>
 
 "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice."
 

From: Adrian Penisoara <ady@warpnet.ro>
To: Akinori Aki MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org>
Cc: FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	FreeBSD GNATS database <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: ports/16545: mail/imap-uw: update to 4.7a
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 20:43:36 +0200 (EET)

 Hi again,
 
  As usual, with considerable delay, here's a patchset that combines
 Akniori and Mikhail Teterin's suggestions (less the in-discussion
 safegets.[ch] files).
 
  Aside from turning on building PAM support by default there are just some
 minor cosmetic fixups (thanks Akinori) and usual checksum/makefile
 updates.
 
  Ady (@warpnet.ro)
 
 begin 644 imap-uw-4.7a.diff.gz
 M'XL("#_XIC@"`VEM87`M=7<M-"XW82YD:69F`,T8:W/:2/*S]"MZL3\D)PL]
 M$,\M]HP!VYPQ]B&2[&ZERCN21J"RD+0:R81*^;]?SPAA,-B7W;H/5\%2JZ??
 MT]/=$R_P?5#3?`+!DB1JOJK&H:?=DD?J!R$MD5N$K*KJ44K))AD,J`MF'8Q:
 MQZAW=`N,=KLM*XIR($:R\P@NJ8.D8.H=LX4,".BZ?'X.JG&&:$4\S\]E.($)
 M74$2IQD#-PY#ZF9!',&RM-&/TXZTT2"K)_"9IHP3I/3//$BIUY&L:E-6WE@@
 M7,&`9!3<E.(+L5(;_D4B;GV3+WY9Q$M$2@G+\)-C3B]32B_L0:>P2EN2(-1>
 M^WCV!$:U9H@@:(:I86!TD[M:MX!E](G"\%L"IT*DK`Y&]FS2NQUV"T^XQ>K]
 MS=4.*E\)K')(263E&"EZUN_-AE=WT]'0[DK<2!EN>_9L.'VP1S..\[.DHVGX
 MK+K$K:X(6P31/(NC*O5RX9`&7V60=NC\/*)9U0^T)'>T99"F<<K>$B#"@@+$
 MGM;/#`LWM5[NZJ[0/`K4!<&=K7JT$,PYDR"BF@S#7V?37G_V8'^Z_+4K53.2
 M5G^7@4?A<C3F3IQ^+T/R?/I]E_H9=:O2)B19$+*CRSOLU3!V']6$9.Z"ZY&5
 M=YAQTS"8H\D,_X;3;>#/?4P-AWE5XJVK:<RI?C-ONI*TR(2[J]7J:)Q'M[U[
 M];+W;Z;A0\63H)O51;8,>6[<]VY[GV;7_^Q*48Q;O?U:4R9#-?#A]/L&^0P_
 M=:$2Q149>N/QPZPWO1K.NI+C)TA(0T;%7EB-,\,$Q:J?M8JM.$??^M=W#[?V
 MU3-4?OD%9@L\#JH;!C3*@"T('A8(`R<EZ1I601B"0R$B2\2>?K>OQZ,+$;[*
 MV]8<JKC(@]##**"\;`'(`2Q/^'&JR&IAJGK(]%N<@XM',V=4L)`\6Z")@4M$
 M27#V9'ZM;.SH8J"^5BJXG6\*]`)&G)#NVO&FM"CFPC">D1?XLBJK24J+I.D4
 M-O?OGT'E<?@RO1F,IL_:2UII_ZBZQ8(][3]K+'6UF'DTT?`(?--XMB0QRU2A
 MNL/#]L'U=@0MN:2?>="'L^'D\S-"M[V;X<,.O,5=CGM7=OG%C\IV!;,"%_"\
 M?92]H^6?ER^L:EY]6[BWF(,&L%V1+M.@J)N6Z`#-3DTO:OIN!W@AWV\!>KM3
 MWVL!#=X!+)Z?ZNV@#A_*8E<4@(_0A6;-I[KC6*UFJ]6TVE;=J9-&V_2\IJDC
 MW))5>_3[\!@G&*V&V:S77HO>/_Z<TFB;CD4]ITY=G_K4L6JHJ=;V*?[Y3<L_
 MT'$H`I7IIFG)RIXN\F*-93A>JT5,1T?+&U:KX9*F6?-<QZBW#6K59&5?!]EU
 MI&VT6^TZEJ*M<%&L7DCJOF>V3#2A370?Y=6;#9VZ!G$:Z$O3=V78D?Z*%YJF
 MV6J^D23"2=Q+\5:)L]WBUPL'*?.:X,=FAT.N]Q.H+D8(D4'`+7AUULHV78W3
 M8"Y]P5(VB;%C-T&W.GJ]8[4*"U1NPANL@DO8;8*N=ZQ:QZQM[7Z;:\=N`W4U
 M.H:Q.2?<\%;CK`F*>*+E"DX;_7BY))''>&E@@1.N(7ZB:1IX%"O>&K`"0H"E
 MZ"GP<A**B039\->;3OM=DD+JRHK:[W==?"LG&P#&DVX8@<H0G/8F6,*[*8FP
 MQG->$!'4+6Y)\>)!!/#RY7)=C2%A-/=B!'`66+(Y`G[(LA1K)0>]+?B5,Z6^
 MVS)-3AQAJX^!+<6+;ZN5&EQ:G-0$,==JZF+X,]N\10FM)W!-4W31AR@60Q^0
 M=)XO>6>B+,.J';`%]9`0?\L`(Q3-.R#B7EW(JO"DV1+EI&6>&0T1U=?8>J%*
 M@HN>/>R+RMFMJ'-0+[2<I1J&17."N0;JX"D.O*Z+'1%A-XY8UD5@<FG?C#\-
 MKH85X;)41C1+<UIL0X4SI&Y%F*E@/^Y()["9(N$^S.=ST7YZ^_WL-O9R+)>8
 MA-+IAXM/H_'@(_R!:\5,9-\/^Z/>V/X#[NRNPP(\R%>SW^Z'W81]XZ.-(D'_
 M>MB_N?_23<@2,<I?%[,O`%"D?7]W-\9FU-6>T*<"AT/1Z+/H,=TB7K%+0BVB
 M*R9"1W!@QW&WH)W:U_<][**"T`DB+66+S=[7FCSA<"S9Y)O#:CQ,&"(MJ+4:
 M4*OJ$*>P".8+FO(X_X@WI0<<'M]=C28;N-BH?6\FPR^VP(C/P@&6Q''(PRER
 MIBW.A*FWBM%)V4,V-_,4'(D2_(4HP;M1LD24ZMLH%4D['I19&[KI.LF*3,,0
 M!KLA++S`WG=FM$%I6.897E!*/U[0Q@8M1)P4HQH$V4\<(6J4(6I4NS2A)!S0
 M!(<B&KD!3UHALUGCI$U=W]2S'62CO2O@!#=,]38"LE)3F_,I[=;6V<W!!AH]
 M/?"RBF#F)B7X]87$?2%QP6=;*`M+,-I"6PEN(8&/E8P3\VY>OOE0ST'WD1&?
 M"J'KR,7WG")U%GB"N_"Z51=>&^:FBBE[6&-;VZ15&F2T5(MUD_(+%7XCF#CI
 M8P'AKP"R^+$$\K#DNK.+@O56FWZ<:X.AW9^^--(2<]B8RY4?[,@OY`>MN+'3
 MBDT\%XIX<J=YN<>VP-V@6%5X\/DG5O<5"3+L%W&<\>^=,X+'@WZCKA9P7@_7
 M"D`NFLC?E(6L7)20X?%KULB'-;\.Q,L$VS0F?'3LCE'>#CA2T).0Q;`@>'2S
 M&(CG\159]>,PC%?\]A#B-9;Q-21.0:.9BR/,LHK-P^_("BI]1\F",+QJH:)=
 MH[C2)5EC\\7O'9W*$9VOU$$1,I'@4OG?(!*N%^G/8DF2LG3]X`>8=`\)8:QD
 M<-TXC[(?Y'D[$V^'MMV[&NZET`9W-!LW:[OYB/.9V>[HM>/YN&5X-R.+VX68
 M!7#,_9_^^]MY]'H[U?^^G<H[<@/&3\&>%3@L>M0G>9C]?"R)9(6/DO\W2?0?
 (2/9$FIH4``!Y
 `
 end
 
 

From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org>
To: ady@warpnet.ro
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/16545: mail/imap-uw: update to 4.7a
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 04:52:46 +0900

   Hi.  Sorry for the delay.
 
 At Sun, 13 Feb 2000 20:43:36 +0200 (EET),
 Adrian Penisoara <ady@warpnet.ro> wrote:
 >  As usual, with considerable delay, here's a patchset that combines
 > Akniori and Mikhail Teterin's suggestions (less the in-discussion
 > safegets.[ch] files).
 > 
 >  Aside from turning on building PAM support by default there are just some
 > minor cosmetic fixups (thanks Akinori) and usual checksum/makefile
 > updates.
 
   Your view re the safegets.[ch] files sounds reasonable to me.  Seems
 better place them under patches/ as patch files, now I think.  I'll
 hack up a fix with imap-{uw,utils} after the thaw.  Please do review
 them then.
 
 
   And at a glance your patch seems fine though I've not tested yet.
 Thank you for doing it!
 
 -- 
                            /
                           /__  __
                          / )  )  ) )  /
 Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  <knu@idaemons.org>
 
 "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice."
 

From: Adrian Penisoara <ady@warpnet.ro>
To: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/16545: mail/imap-uw: update to 4.7a
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:36:58 +0200 (EET)

 Hi,
 
 On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote:
 
 >   Hi.  Sorry for the delay.
 > 
 > At Sun, 13 Feb 2000 20:43:36 +0200 (EET),
 > Adrian Penisoara <ady@warpnet.ro> wrote:
 > >  As usual, with considerable delay, here's a patchset that combines
 > > Akniori and Mikhail Teterin's suggestions (less the in-discussion
 > > safegets.[ch] files).
 > > 
 > >  Aside from turning on building PAM support by default there are just some
 > > minor cosmetic fixups (thanks Akinori) and usual checksum/makefile
 > > updates.
 > 
 >   Your view re the safegets.[ch] files sounds reasonable to me.  Seems
 > better place them under patches/ as patch files, now I think.  I'll
 > hack up a fix with imap-{uw,utils} after the thaw.  Please do review
 > them then.
 > 
 
  Looking at you port for imap-utils looks like it's pretty much dependent
 of the imap-uw port; the sources use many headers from inside the imap-uw
 tarball...
 
  I wonder how does it sound a merge between the two of these ports ??
  
 
 > 
 >   And at a glance your patch seems fine though I've not tested yet.
 > Thank you for doing it!
 
  I'm still worried about PAM by-default building; I haven't received any
 feedback (aside from Mikhail Teterin) and I might get it after the port is
 commited and will prove to break things up (although it works fine for
 me).
 
  And, BTW, I steel haven't heard a word about security auditing for mlock
 sources...
 
  Ady (@warpnet.ro)
 
 

From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org>
To: ady@warpnet.ro
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/16545: mail/imap-uw: update to 4.7a
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 03:19:04 +0900

   Hi,
 
 At Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:36:58 +0200 (EET),
 Adrian Penisoara <ady@warpnet.ro> wrote:
 >  Looking at you port for imap-utils looks like it's pretty much dependent
 > of the imap-uw port; the sources use many headers from inside the imap-uw
 > tarball...
 
   Indeed.
 
 >  I wonder how does it sound a merge between the two of these ports ??
 
 Sounds good.  But suppose we separated c-client library from imap-uw;
 It might be bad for them to be as one since imap-utils are tools not
 only for servers but also for clients, while imap-uw is a set of
 servers itself.  You may think we could prepare an option NO_SERVERS
 or whatever for the merged port, but what for the package...?
 
 
   Still, I agree with you but about mlock.
 
 >  I'm still worried about PAM by-default building; I haven't received any
 > feedback (aside from Mikhail Teterin) and I might get it after the port is
 > commited and will prove to break things up (although it works fine for
 > me).
 
   It's been working so good here too.  Don't worry!
 
 >  And, BTW, I steel haven't heard a word about security auditing for mlock
 > sources...
 
   That's a shame.  I wish they would pay regards to our feedback...
 
 -- 
                            /
                           /__  __
                          / )  )  ) )  /
 Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  <knu@idaemons.org>
 
 "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice."
 
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: mharo 
State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 14 15:20:21 PST 2000 
State-Changed-Why:  
Committed, thanks 
>Unformatted:
