From ohauer@gmx.de  Sat Jun 26 23:22:11 2010
Return-Path: <ohauer@gmx.de>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4822106564A
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 23:22:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21E758FC14
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 23:22:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2010 23:22:10 -0000
Received: from u18-124.dsl.vianetworks.de (EHLO [172.20.1.100]) [194.231.39.124]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp049) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2010 01:22:10 +0200
Message-Id: <4C268BCC.8060301@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:22:52 +0200
From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, 
 FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, lev@freebsd.org, 
 pgollucci@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <4C26864E.1080002@p6m7g8.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] port devel/subversion update to 1.6.12 and rename	rotten
 patchfiles
References: <20100626222649.06325201F2@u18-124.dsl.vianetworks.de> <4C267FD1.4030305@p6m7g8.com> <20100626224636.GC13091@lonesome.com> <4C2685F3.9010009@gmx.de> <4C26864E.1080002@p6m7g8.com>

>Number:         148180
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Re: [patch] port devel/subversion update to 1.6.12 and rename	rotten
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Jun 27 03:50:07 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:    Sun Jun 27 04:55:46 UTC 2010
>Last-Modified:  Sun Jun 27 04:55:46 UTC 2010
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 On 2010-06-27 00:59, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
 > On 6/26/2010 6:57 PM, olli hauer wrote:
 >>> I'm also not too sure that renaming the patchfiles is necessary -- is
 >>> it possible to just fix the tool to deal with this case?
 >>>
 >>> mcl
 >>>
 >>
 >> Hm, no problem.
 >> I got the Idea to rename the patchfiles from the FreeBSD wiki.
 > We try not to do it for cvs history reasons.  There are a few reasons to
 > do it however:
 >   1) request a reopcopy; typical 1 is not worth the effort.
 >   2) the patches have piled up and new patches are non trivial to
 >      make or conflict
 
 Ok, this is a valid reason.
 
 
 >> If you like I create a second patch for the port, and change only
 >> the PORTVERSION in Makefile.common and the distinfo.
 >> There is nothing else to change for the update to 1.6.12.
 > yes please.  The same pr will be fine.
 > 
 
 A new patch is on the way, a quick build in tinderbox was OK.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: linimon 
State-Changed-When: Sun Jun 27 04:53:03 UTC 2010 
State-Changed-Why:  


Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnats-admin->freebsd-ports-bugs 
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon 
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jun 27 04:53:03 UTC 2010 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Misfiled followup to ports/148173; content migrated. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148180 
>Unformatted:
  patchfiles
