From nobody@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 22 00:10:58 1999
Return-Path: <nobody@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id 971E514E2B; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 00:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <19991022071058.971E514E2B@hub.freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 00:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: charon@freethought.org
Sender: nobody@FreeBSD.ORG
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: the apsfilter "requires" line on http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ isn't complete
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         14456
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       the apsfilter "requires" line on http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ isn't complete
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Oct 22 00:20:00 PDT 1999
>Closed-Date:    Sat Nov 13 18:40:12 PST 1999
>Last-Modified:  Sat Nov 13 18:40:27 PST 1999
>Originator:     charon
>Release:        3.3-STABLE
>Organization:
>Environment:
Don't have FreeBSD up right now, but it's not a problem on my machine.

(It's a 3.3-STABLE current as of ctm delta 3.0335, made world Oct. 20.)
>Description:
Apsfilter requires ports that aren't listed in the "requires" field at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=apsfilter&stype=all.
>How-To-Repeat:
Go to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=apsfilter&stype=all and note the paucity of the "requires" field.  Or, alternately, download what it says apsfilter requires and then try a 'make apsfilter' on a machine that's not on the internet.  Have fun.
>Fix:
Put back up all the other requirements.  If the requirements vary for installations because of apsfilter's new installation interface, then put up the requirements for each option.

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed  
State-Changed-By: cpiazza 
State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 13 18:40:12 PST 1999 
State-Changed-Why:  
This was recently fixed by andreas, thanks for letting us know! 
>Unformatted:
