From raj@csub.edu  Fri Jan  8 21:41:47 2010
Return-Path: <raj@csub.edu>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921A81065672
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  8 Jan 2010 21:41:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from raj@csub.edu)
Received: from mh0.csub.edu (mh0.csub.edu [136.168.1.94])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714398FC18
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  8 Jan 2010 21:41:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [136.168.65.106] (pandora-0-22-69-5a-d9-76.dyn.csub.edu [136.168.65.106])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by mh0.csub.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o08Lfjqb098392
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:41:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from raj@csub.edu)
Message-Id: <4B47A697.8070904@csub.edu>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:41:43 -0800
From: Russell Jackson <raj@csub.edu>
To: Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <20100108185643.45201.qmail@botelhor.bplab.local>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysutils/puppet: update to 0.25.2
References: <20100108185643.45201.qmail@botelhor.bplab.local>

>Number:         142487
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Re: [PATCH] sysutils/puppet: update to 0.25.2
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Jan 08 21:50:01 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:    Sat Jan 09 02:52:26 UTC 2010
>Last-Modified:  Sat Jan 09 02:52:26 UTC 2010
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
 --------------enig2D5465920B021DDA306254BC
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Is this tested?
 
 I haven't yet had time to investigate or upgrade my systems to 0.25.2, bu=
 t there were
 issues reported with 0.25.2 when used under Passenger. If the port is upd=
 ated and it
 breaks things for those using Passenger, they're not going to be very hap=
 py.
 
 --=20
 Russell A. Jackson <raj@csub.edu>
 Network Analyst
 California State University, Bakersfield
 
 --------------enig2D5465920B021DDA306254BC
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
 iEYEARECAAYFAktHppkACgkQq3dx2r0nUN+fYwCffHxMs491RJjOISyFtY/BiJCJ
 6EAAn1MknqUtbQdj9CmTcSVj41vnkeSd
 =4Bmv
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --------------enig2D5465920B021DDA306254BC--
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: linimon 
State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 9 02:51:44 UTC 2010 
State-Changed-Why:  
Misfiled followup to ports/142475; content migrated. 


Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnats-admin->freebsd-ports-bugs 
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon 
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jan 9 02:51:44 UTC 2010 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=142487 
>Unformatted:
