From nobody@FreeBSD.org  Wed Jun 11 16:30:54 2008
Return-Path: <nobody@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79911065671
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:30:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::21])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71328FC24
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:30:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by www.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5BGUsSf030407
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:30:54 GMT
	(envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by www.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m5BGUspw030406;
	Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:30:54 GMT
	(envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <200806111630.m5BGUspw030406@www.freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:30:54 GMT
From: savvas <vicedar@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: separate libtclsqlite3 and sqlite
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         124490
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       databases/sqlite3 - separate libtclsqlite3 and sqlite
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    mnag
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Jun 11 16:40:02 UTC 2008
>Closed-Date:    Thu Apr 30 11:24:11 UTC 2009
>Last-Modified:  Thu Apr 30 11:24:11 UTC 2009
>Originator:     savvas
>Release:        7.0-RELEASE
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD freebsd 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008     root@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386
>Description:
Is it possible the maintainer of /usr/ports/databases/sqlite3/ to separate the libtclsqlite3 and the command line interface in two ports packages?
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->mnag 
Responsible-Changed-By: mnag 
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jun 11 22:29:53 UTC 2008 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
I'll take it. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=124490 
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback 
State-Changed-By: mnag 
State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 29 13:55:25 UTC 2008 
State-Changed-Why:  
Why do you need this? I don't think a reasonable idea. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=124490 
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed 
State-Changed-By: pav 
State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 30 11:23:57 UTC 2009 
State-Changed-Why:  
Feedback timeout 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=124490 
>Unformatted:
