From jkh@FreeBSD.org  Tue Mar 27 13:53:52 2001
Return-Path: <jkh@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AE737B71E
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:53:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from jkh@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2RLroW43957
	for freebsd-gnats-submit; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:53:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh)
Message-Id: <200103272153.f2RLroW43957@freefall.freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:53:50 -0800 (PST)
From: <jkh@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: 19673

>Number:         26157
>Category:       misc
>Synopsis:       19673
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    gnats-admin
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Mar 27 14:00:01 PST 2001
>Closed-Date:    Tue Mar 27 14:03:39 PST 2001
>Last-Modified:  Wed Oct 26 06:38:22 GMT 2005
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 Well, this one is problematic.  The script lives elsewhere in -current,
 where it's easy to edit, but on the vendor branch in contrib in -stable,
 which I'm loath to take it off.  Any luck in simply getting the ISC to
 accept this change instead?
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: jkh 
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 27 14:03:39 PST 2001 
State-Changed-Why:  
Bogus PR induced by not citing another PR properly enough for GNATS 
to file it in the right place. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=26157 

From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: pending/26157: 19673
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:02:44 -0800

 Oh gack, I guess I needed to put more in the subject line than the
 PR# (19673) to get it appended as a proper follow-up.  I'll close
 this one.
>Unformatted:
