From phobos.walker.org!kew@tau-ceti.isc-br.com  Tue Aug 27 20:50:34 1996
Received: from tau-ceti.isc-br.com (root@tau-ceti.isc-br.com [129.189.2.133])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA22299
          for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 20:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by tau-ceti.isc-br.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #10)
	id m0uvbUu-0002gmC; Tue, 27 Aug 96 20:40 PDT
Received: (from root@localhost) by phobos.walker.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA12671; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 20:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199608280323.UAA12671@phobos.walker.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 20:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: kew@timesink.spk.wa.us
Reply-To: kew@timesink.spk.wa.us
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: misc problem
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2

>Number:         1546
>Category:       misc
>Synopsis:       /usr/lib/libgcc.so.261.0 not found on 2.1.5 install
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Aug 27 21:00:01 PDT 1996
>Closed-Date:    Wed Aug 28 00:04:49 PDT 1996
>Last-Modified:  Wed Aug 28 00:06:14 PDT 1996
>Originator:     kew@timesink.spk.wa.us
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386
>Organization:
just me, at my home; no company, no officialness
>Environment:

	 FRESH (i.e., no prior FreeBSD on disk) 2.1.5 installation from CDROM

>Description:

	/usr/lib/libgcc.so.261.0 not found

>How-To-Repeat:

	execute emacs that is installed from 2.1.5 CDROM

>Fix:
	
	My fix was to reinstall said lib from old 2.1 CDROM.

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: jkh 
State-Changed-When: Wed Aug 28 00:04:49 PDT 1996 
State-Changed-Why:  
This is on the 2.1.5 distribution, it's simply part of the compat20 
distribution, which you need to select during installation.  It used 
to be on by default, which I changed in 2.1.5 to avoid involuntary 
library pollution, and this seems to have broken a few packages which 
were erroneously linked (they should not have been) with the old libgcc. 
>Unformatted:
