From nuucp@dg-rtp.dg.com  Wed Aug 13 09:50:43 1997
Received: from dg-rtp.dg.com (dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com [128.222.1.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA12168
          for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 09:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02)
	id AA02026; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:50:04 -0400
Received: from ponds by dg-rtp.dg.com.rtp.dg.com; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:50 EDT
Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA09479 for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 07:13:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id HAA03214; Wed, 13 Aug 1997 07:22:57 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199708131122.HAA03214@lakes.dignus.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 07:22:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
Reply-To: ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com
To: ponds!freebsd.org!FreeBSD-gnats-submit
Subject: SL/IP problems between 2.2.1 & 2.2.2
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2

>Number:         4295
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       SL/IP difficulties between 2.2.1 & 2.2.2
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Aug 13 10:00:01 PDT 1997
>Closed-Date:    Wed Jun 13 13:54:52 MDT 2001
>Last-Modified:  Wed Jun 13 13:55:34 MDT 2001
>Originator:     Thomas David Rivers
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.2-2 i386
>Organization:
dignus.com
>Environment:

 Two FreeBSD machines; running a null-modem cable - one 2.2.1+ and
 one 2.2.2-RELEASE.

>Description:

 I've got a strange problem; two FreeBSD machines (one 2.2.1+ and one 2.2.2)
 with a hardwired null-modem cable.  Doing slattach's at 38400.  Here's
 the config's from the 2.2.1+ system:
	# ifconfig sl0
	sl0: flags=8011<UP,POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 552
        	  inet 10.0.0.8 --> 10.0.0.9 netmask 0xffffff00 
	# slattach -s 38400 -h -l /dev/cuaa1
	/var/run/slattach.cuaa1.pid

 and, here's the same information from the freshly-installed 2.2.2 
 system:
	# ifconfig sl0
	sl0: flags=8011<UP,POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 552
        	  inet 10.0.0.9 --> 10.0.0.8 netmask 0xffffff00 
	# slattach -s 38400 -h -l /dev/cuaa0
	/var/run/slattach.cuaa0.pid


 Now, from either system, I can ping the other (with a response time
of ~47.6ms).  However, I can't ftp or telnet from one to another,
in either direction.    In the past, this was caused by a VJ compression
mis-match (one had VJ and the other didn't) which is why I disabled
VJ compression on the slattach.

 Now - here's the _really_ interesting part - I can nfs_mount 
a file system on 10.0.0.9 exported by 10.0.0.8.  ls, etc.. seem to
work fine.  Telnet and FTP are the ones that hang...


>How-To-Repeat:

 	Set up a hardwired SL/IP connection between a 2.2.2 and 2.2.1 and 
	try to ftp/telnet.

>Fix:

	Not clear...	

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
To: ponds!mt.sri.com!nate, ponds!lakes.dignus.com!rivers
Cc: ponds!freebsd.org!FreeBSD-gnats-submit
Subject: Re: kern/4295: SL/IP problems between 2.2.1 & 2.2.2
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 20:45:45 -0400 (EDT)

 > 
 > >  Now - here's the _really_ interesting part - I can nfs_mount 
 > > a file system on 10.0.0.9 exported by 10.0.0.8.  ls, etc.. seem to
 > > work fine.  Telnet and FTP are the ones that hang...
 > 
 > This is almost *always* a problem with both ends not agreeing on using
 > CSLIP.  One end is using it, and the other isn't.  (UDP packets make it,
 > but TCP packets don't.)
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Nate
 > 
 
  Umm... yep, been there, done that :-) I believe I mentioned that in 
 the report...  I checked that several times before filing the report...
 
  Also - see the slattach commands; both of them have -c.
 
 	- Dave R. -
 
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: imp 
State-Changed-When: Wed Jun 13 13:54:52 MDT 2001 
State-Changed-Why:  
The village had this setup for years and it works.  I'm assuming that 
this is no longer a problem in the latest versions (since that's what the 
village is using for one of its links right now). 


http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=4295 
>Unformatted:
