From nobody@FreeBSD.org  Tue Feb 12 08:54:37 2002
Return-Path: <nobody@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316FA37B41E
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1CGpq554846;
	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:51:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <200202121651.g1CGpq554846@freefall.freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:51:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Dominic Blais <db@interplex.ca>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Impossibility of grouping IP into a pipe for traffic shaping...
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         34880
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       Impossibility of grouping IP into a pipe for traffic shaping...
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    luigi
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          wish
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Feb 12 09:00:02 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:    Fri Apr 09 19:32:24 UTC 2010
>Last-Modified:  Fri Apr 09 19:32:24 UTC 2010
>Originator:     Dominic Blais
>Release:        4.3
>Organization:
Interplex Telecom
>Environment:
Doesn't matter
>Description:
I would like to be able to GROUP IPs and associate it with a single pipe in order to limit the bandwidth on this group.
This would be really usefull for us...
I tried with /31 and /30 masks and it only works as if it was /32
it looks like only /0 /8 /16 /24 /32 works....

>How-To-Repeat:
      
>Fix:
      
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To: Dominic Blais <db@interplex.ca>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/34880: Impossibility of grouping IP into a pipe for traffic shaping...
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:31:36 +0200

 On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:51:52AM -0800, Dominic Blais wrote:
 > 
 > I would like to be able to GROUP IPs and associate it with a single
 > pipe in order to limit the bandwidth on this group.  This would be
 > really usefull for us...  I tried with /31 and /30 masks and it
 > only works as if it was /32 it looks like only /0 /8 /16 /24 /32
 > works....
 > 
 Please provide a How-To-Repeat steps.
 
 
 Cheers,
 -- 
 Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
 ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
 ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
 +380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine
 
 http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
 http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

From: Dominic Blais <db@interplex.ca>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, db@interplex.ca
Cc:  
Subject: Re: kern/34880: Impossibility of grouping IP into a pipe for traffic shaping...
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:13:00 -0500

 As an example:
 
 /sbin/ipfw add 1000 pipe 1 ip from 192.168.100.151:255.255.255.243 to 
 any out via tl0
 
 This doesn't works.... I can't set a pipe for 3 IPs (151, 152, 153) ...
 The same thing happen with bit masks... (/30 to get 4 IPs)
 It looks like only bitmasks of (/0 , /8, /16, /24, /32) works
 "     "       "      "      masks   of (0.0.0.0, 255.0.0.0, 255.255.0.0, 
 255.255.255.0, 255.255.255.255)  works
 
 It would be nice if it was possible to take any number of IPs into a 
 pipe to settle a limit for a group of IP in a subnet...but
 not the whole subnet....
 
 You see???
 
 -- 
 Dominic Blais
 Administrateur reseau
 Interplex telecom -=[ http://www.interplex.ca ]=-
 Email: db@interplex.ca
 
 
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->luigi 
Responsible-Changed-By: kris 
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Oct 10 22:34:04 PDT 2003 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Assign to ipfw maintainer 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=34880 
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: luigi 
State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 9 19:31:44 UTC 2010 
State-Changed-Why:  
not applicable anymore 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=34880 
>Unformatted:
