From achilov-rn@askd.ru  Fri Jul 29 11:30:57 2011
Return-Path: <achilov-rn@askd.ru>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED71B106566C
	for <bug-followup@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:30:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from achilov-rn@askd.ru)
Received: from master.askd.ru (master.askd.ru [80.242.75.6])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E1E8FC15
	for <bug-followup@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:30:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from to-594.askd.gmbh (sentry [192.168.1.94])
	by master.askd.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p6TBAxhd036092;
	Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:10:59 +0700 (NOVT)
	(envelope-from achilov-rn@askd.ru)
Message-Id: <201107291810.57763.achilov-rn@askd.ru>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:10:57 +0700
From: "Rashid N. Achilov" <achilov-rn@askd.ru>
Reply-To: "Achilov, Rashid" <achilov-rn@askd.ru>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, achilov-rn@askd.ru
Subject: Revision for bug

>Number:         159292
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       Revision for bug
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Jul 29 11:40:00 UTC 2011
>Closed-Date:    Mon Aug 01 05:05:41 UTC 2011
>Last-Modified:  Mon Aug 01 05:05:41 UTC 2011
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 There are some revisions for this bug
 
 First. Tio obtain bug you should place "lo0" as latest member of network 
 interfaces set, i.e:
 
 network_interfaces="xl0 lo0" - bug will occured
 network_interfaces="lo0 xl0" - bug will not occured
 network_interfaces="xl0" - bug also will not occured
 
 Second. To eliminate bug you must down interface and configure it manually 
 again
 
 So, I'd like to ask - WHY? Why an initialisation order takes so great and wild 
 importance? (I had have tried boot with rc_debug="YES" and had have seed, 
 that ANY difference between "worked" and "non-worked" boot is network 
 inrterfaces initialization order - in "worked" lo0, next xl0, 
 in "non-worked" - xl0, next lo0!
 -- 
    With Best Regards.
    Rashid N. Achilov (RNA1-RIPE), JID: citycat4@jabber.infos.ru
    OOO "ACK" telecommunications administrator, e-mail: achilov-rn [at] askd.ru
    PGP: 83 CD E2 A7 37 4A D5 81 D6 D6 52 BF C9 2F 85 AF 97 BE CB 0A
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: linimon 
State-Changed-When: Mon Aug 1 05:04:55 UTC 2011 
State-Changed-Why:  
Misfiled followup to kern/159103; content migrated. 


Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnats-admin->freebsd-bugs 
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon 
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Aug 1 05:04:55 UTC 2011 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159292 
>Unformatted:
