From mrkoin@ua.fm  Tue Jun 12 11:53:41 2007
Return-Path: <mrkoin@ua.fm>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA0D16A400
	for <bug-followup@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:53:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mrkoin@ua.fm)
Received: from web01.mi6.kiev.ua (web01.mi6.kiev.ua [193.84.19.3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4492D13C46C
	for <bug-followup@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:53:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mrkoin@ua.fm)
Received: from web03.mi6 ([10.0.0.4] helo=web03.mi6.kiev.ua)
	by web01.mi6.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hy3G3-000184-Ev; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:05:51 +0300
Received: from web by web03.mi6.kiev.ua with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hy3G8-000310-LA; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:05:56 +0300
Message-Id: <E1Hy3G8-000310-LA@web03.mi6.kiev.ua>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:05:56 +0300
From: Anatoly Yarinich <mrkoin@ua.fm>
Reply-To: mrkoin@ua.fm
To: "Eric Anholt" <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, mrkoin@ua.fm
In-Reply-To: <1180116173.4829.0.camel@vonnegut>
Subject: =?windows-1251?B?UmVbMl06IGtlcm4vMTEyNzcyOiBbZHJtXSBbcGF0Y2hdIGFkZCBBVEkgUkFERU9OIEV4cHJlc3MgMTE1MCBbY2hpcD0weDU5NzUxMDAyXQ==?=
References: <1180116173.4829.0.camel@vonnegut>

>Number:         113622
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       =?windows-1251?B?UmVbMl06IGtlcm4vMTEyNzcyOiBbZHJtXSBbcGF0Y2hdIGFkZCBBVEkgUkFERU9OIEV4cHJlc3MgMTE1MCBbY2hpcD0weDU5NzUxMDAyXQ==?=
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    anholt
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Jun 12 12:00:18 GMT 2007
>Closed-Date:    Tue Jun 12 12:11:47 GMT 2007
>Last-Modified:  Tue Jun 12 12:11:47 GMT 2007
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 > From the chipset name, this sounds like it would be part of the x1000
 > series, which is very unsupported.=20
 
 I cannot name the exact family for this chip since different sources give d=
 ifferent information. :(
 Some sources state that it is ATI Radeon Express 200M
 
 > Do you have X and DRI up and running
 > with your change?
 
 Yes. I have X and DRI running well on my notebook. The only limitation is t=
 hat direct rendering is internally disabled, but DRI itself on patched drm =
 module gives very good performance gain in comparison to other drivers trie=
 d on my system. If you need, I can submit here all the requested informatio=
 n.
 
 BTW, As I can see, Artem could not make drm to work well on his card, thus =
 I'd like to note that I am running Xorg 6.9.0 currently.=20
 
 Thank you for your time!
 
 --
 Anatoly Yarinich
 
 -- =F0=E5=EA=EB=E0=EC=E0 --------------------------------------------------=
 ---------
 =CD=E5 =F5=E2=E0=F2=E0=E5=F2 =ED=E0 =CB=E0=EC=E1=EE=F0=E4=E6=E8=ED=E8? =CD=
 =E0=E9=E4=E8 =ED=EE=E2=F3=FE =F0=E0=E1=EE=F2=F3!
 http://www.rabota.ua/JobSearch/Vacancy/Search.xpx?ito=3D1140
 
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: linimon 
State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 12 12:10:58 UTC 2007 
State-Changed-Why:  
Misfiled followup to kern/112772; content migrated. 


Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnats-admin->anholt 
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon 
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jun 12 12:10:58 UTC 2007 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113622 
>Unformatted:
