From nobody@FreeBSD.org  Fri May 11 08:43:41 2007
Return-Path: <nobody@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C15E16A404
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:43:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [69.147.83.33])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCDA13C457
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:43:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4B8heiX083245
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:43:40 GMT
	(envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l4B8cdMi082221;
	Fri, 11 May 2007 08:38:39 GMT
	(envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <200705110838.l4B8cdMi082221@www.freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:38:39 GMT
From: Mikael Vidstedt<mikael.vidstedt@bea.com>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Non-monitored locks are dummy-implemented
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.0

>Number:         112591
>Category:       kern
>Synopsis:       Non-monitored locks are dummy-implemented
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    linimon
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri May 11 08:50:03 GMT 2007
>Closed-Date:    Sat Aug 28 10:46:10 UTC 2010
>Last-Modified:  Sat Aug 28 10:46:10 UTC 2010
>Originator:     Mikael Vidstedt
>Release:        6.2
>Organization:
BEA Systems, Inc.
>Environment:
FreeBSD  6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 10:40:27 UTC 2007     root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

>Description:
As far as I can tell, the implementation of the NLMPROC4_NM_LOCK RPC
procedure is not correctly implemented. It looks like it always returns
"granted" regardless of the actual locking state of the file handle.

If a full implementation is not possible, I would at least say that
returning "denied" is a better implementation, since "granted" may lead
to data corruption.
>How-To-Repeat:
-
>Fix:
-
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback 
State-Changed-By: linimon 
State-Changed-When: Sun Sep 28 02:46:47 UTC 2008 
State-Changed-Why:  
To which part of the system does this PR apply? 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112591 
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->linimon 
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon 
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Sep 28 02:48:32 UTC 2008 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
track. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112591 
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed 
State-Changed-By: linimon 
State-Changed-When: Sat Aug 28 10:45:05 UTC 2010 
State-Changed-Why:  
We never received enough information to determine what part of the system 
this applied to.  To submitter: if you are still interested, let us know. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112591 
>Unformatted:
