From nobody@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 15 12:31:21 1999
Return-Path: <nobody@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id BF7F014D62; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 12:31:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <19991115203121.BF7F014D62@hub.freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 12:31:21 -0800 (PST)
From: pauel@encred.ru
Sender: nobody@FreeBSD.ORG
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: ipfw show take wrong values of counter/or say: "rule not found",but rule exist
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         14907
>Category:       i386
>Synopsis:       ipfw show take wrong values of counter/or say: "rule not found",but rule exist
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Nov 15 12:40:03 PST 1999
>Closed-Date:    Wed Mar 1 05:44:27 PST 2000
>Last-Modified:  Wed Mar  1 05:46:28 PST 2000
>Originator:     Pauel Loshkin
>Release:        3.3
>Organization:
Encred-Software
>Environment:
FreeBSD access.encred.ru 3.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 13 12:32:08 MSK 1999     root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/ENCRE
D  i386
>Description:
Periodicaly,if i use command ipfw s n-rule (or ipfw -a l n-rule) ipfw
say me: "rule not found", but rule exist
next time (momentaly after "not found") i command ipfw s - and all Ok.
It's 1-st
and 2-st - ipfw s may indicate illegal counter of packet
(6666666666666666666666666666666 for example),and next ipfw s show
normal counter.
I use ipfw s for count statistics - and from 300-400 ipfw s 1-2 illegal
(or not found/or incresible value)

It's problem i don't see in ver 3.1 ,and see in 3.2 and 3.3
>How-To-Repeat:
1-2 times from 300-400 commands ipfw s
(i use cron - every minute running ipfw s - if running continuous cycle i don't see it problem - i test it,
and test my friends)
and one time i take it problem in daily report:

rule 0 - 6666666666666666666 111111111111111111 ip from 0.0.0.0 to 5.0.0.0
rule 0 - 
.....

in my system rule 0 not exist ;)

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: ru 
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 1 05:44:27 PST 2000 
State-Changed-Why:  
Closed as non reproduceable. 
Originator was informed :-) 
>Unformatted:
