From nobody  Sun Mar 22 23:39:38 1998
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA20434;
          Sun, 22 Mar 1998 23:39:38 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <199803230739.XAA20434@hub.freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 23:39:38 -0800 (PST)
From: castor@geocast.com
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: gdb should support PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         6107
>Category:       gnu
>Synopsis:       gdb should support PRINTF_HAS_LONG_LONG
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    obrien
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Mar 22 23:40:04 PST 1998
>Closed-Date:    Fri May 25 03:03:52 PDT 2001
>Last-Modified:  Fri May 25 03:05:10 PDT 2001
>Originator:     Castor Fu
>Release:        2.2.5
>Organization:
Geocast Network Systems
>Environment:
FreeBSD tosh.pa.geocast.net 2.2.5-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.5-S i386 i386

>Description:
gdb could provide better support for the "long long" data type
and allow output in bases other than hexadecimal.  The current version
of gdb requires that "long long's" be output using "%ll" rather than
FreeBSD's "%q".

It's a fairly simple change to extend gdb's, support.  One would 
need to create a macro to abstract the "long long" format, and replace
it.

If I find timeto figure out how to package the diffs, 
I'll try to add them to this PR.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->obrien 
Responsible-Changed-By: obrien 
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul 10 02:46:57 PDT 2000 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=6107 
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: obrien 
State-Changed-When: Fri May 25 03:03:52 PDT 2001 
State-Changed-Why:  
diffs were never followed up with.  Also this is for the version of 
gdb in 2.2.x.  I don't have access to that anymore, and we've updated 
GDB since then.  The PR has no test case, so I can't tell if the PR 
submitter would still find the behavior an issue. 

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=6107 
>Unformatted:
