From nork@FreeBSD.org  Sun Sep  7 06:24:49 2003
Return-Path: <nork@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7659D16A4BF; Sun,  7 Sep 2003 06:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8A3B443FA3; Sun,  7 Sep 2003 06:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp (nadesico.ninth-nine.com [192.168.36.3]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/NinthNine) with SMTP id h87DOl9T071428; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 22:24:47 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200309071324.h87DOl9T071428@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 22:24:47 +0900 (JST)
From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc: re@FreeBSD.org
Subject: add Cc: maintainer feature to send-pr

>Number:         56554
>Category:       gnu
>Synopsis:       add Cc: maintainer feature to send-pr
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    re
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Sep 07 06:30:07 PDT 2003
>Closed-Date:    Mon Feb 26 21:37:27 GMT 2007
>Last-Modified:  Mon Feb 26 21:37:27 GMT 2007
>Originator:     Norikatsu Shigemura
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
Ensure Technology Ltd.
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD nadesico.ninth-nine.com 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #29: Fri Sep 5 02:07:55 JST 2003 nork@nadesico.ninth-nine.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NADESICO i386
>Description:
	Almost submitter using send-pr(1) forgot to contact to maintainer.
	I(as FreeBSD committer) should contact to maintainer instead of
	submitter.  I think this is tired and slow work doing.
>How-To-Repeat:
	N/A
>Fix:
	send-pr's patch for 5-current (send-pr.current.diff).
	send-pr's patch for 4-stable  (send-pr.stable.diff).

	Anyone, would you please commit before 4.9-RELEASE?

--- send-pr.current.diff begins here ---
Index: send-pr.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/send-pr/send-pr.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.33 send-pr.sh
--- send-pr.sh	11 Aug 2003 19:41:14 -0000	1.33
+++ send-pr.sh	7 Sep 2003 13:05:00 -0000
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
        [-c address] [-a file] [--version]"
 REMOVE=
 BATCH=
-CC=
+CC="<please set maintainer address if exists>"
 SEVERITY_C=
 
 while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
--- send-pr.current.diff ends here ---

--- send-pr.stable.diff begins here ---
Index: send-pr.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/send-pr/send-pr.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.13.2.11
diff -u -r1.13.2.11 send-pr.sh
--- send-pr.sh	19 Mar 2002 00:33:35 -0000	1.13.2.11
+++ send-pr.sh	7 Sep 2003 13:06:00 -0000
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
        [-c address] [-a file] [--version]"
 REMOVE=
 BATCH=
-CC=
+CC="<please set maintainer address if exists>"
 SEVERITY_C=
 
 while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
--- send-pr.stable.diff ends here ---
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->re 
Responsible-Changed-By: nork 
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Sep 7 07:05:29 PDT 2003 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Please handle this feature. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=56554 

From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: gnu/56554: add Cc: maintainer feature to send-pr
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 15:19:14 +0100

 On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:24:47PM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
 
 > >Description:
 > 	Almost submitter using send-pr(1) forgot to contact to maintainer.
 > 	I(as FreeBSD committer) should contact to maintainer instead of
 > 	submitter.  I think this is tired and slow work doing.
 
 This is a nice idea, but will certainly result in more misfiled PRs.
 
 When people are cc'd on problem reports, they invariably reply to the
 initial mail, leaving freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org in the cc list,
 which causes a PR to be created in the pending category.
 
 Then, very often, this continues with other replies to the thread,
 which has previously resulted in anything up to 10 misfiled PRs being
 created, which then have to be manually migrated over to the right PR.
 
 I think a better place to add this logic would be in the file-pr program.
 
 Ceri
 [with bugmeister hat on]
 -- 
 User: DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR PERSONAL LORD AND SAVIOR?
 Iniaes: Sure, I can accept all forms of payment.
                                            -- www.chatterboxchallenge.com

From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: gnu/56554: add Cc: maintainer feature to send-pr
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 23:57:59 +0900 (JST)

 On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 15:19:14 +0100
 Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
 > > 	Almost submitter using send-pr(1) forgot to contact to maintainer.
 > > 	I(as FreeBSD committer) should contact to maintainer instead of
 > > 	submitter.  I think this is tired and slow work doing.
 > This is a nice idea, but will certainly result in more misfiled PRs.
 
 	Thank you... Hum...
 
 > When people are cc'd on problem reports, they invariably reply to the
 > initial mail, leaving freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org in the cc list,
 > which causes a PR to be created in the pending category.
 > Then, very often, this continues with other replies to the thread,
 > which has previously resulted in anything up to 10 misfiled PRs being
 > created, which then have to be manually migrated over to the right PR.
 > I think a better place to add this logic would be in the file-pr program.
 > Ceri
 
 	Do you think about changing "Dont remove this addr" <freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>
 	than freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org?
 
 > [with bugmeister hat on]
 
 	Thank you also for when!
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: kensmith 
State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 26 21:33:26 UTC 2007 
State-Changed-Why:  

The proposed solution unfortunately causes more trouble than it 
solves.  If this were used replies will always be mis-filed which 
causes lots of problems. 

The folks who run GNATS for us feel it's a bug in GNATS itself 
and would need to be addressed there. 


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=56554 
>Unformatted:
