From nobody@FreeBSD.org  Mon Jan 19 09:01:51 2004
Return-Path: <nobody@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007DE16A4CE
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:01:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [216.136.204.117])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDAA43D2D
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:01:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by www.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0JH1mdL069537
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:01:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by www.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0JH1mhv069536;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:01:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <200401191701.i0JH1mhv069536@www.freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:01:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Rostislav Krasny <rosti_bsd@yahoo.com>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: small typo in arch-handbook ("posh" instruction)
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-2.0

>Number:         61585
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       small typo in arch-handbook ("posh" instruction)
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Jan 19 09:10:07 PST 2004
>Closed-Date:    Mon Jan 19 10:13:35 PST 2004
>Last-Modified:  Mon Jan 19 10:13:35 PST 2004
>Originator:     Rostislav Krasny
>Release:        5.2-RELEASE
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
      "Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko" <doublef@tele-kom.ru> suggested me
      send this doc PR. This is a copy of its response email:

      > I thought that I found a typo in the arch-handbook and I wrote about
      > that to the freebsd-doc mailing list. You can read that email at
      > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040117005106.21558.qmail
      > I didn't get any response yet. Maybe I'm missing something and this
      > isn't a typo? What is "posh" instruction? :-))

      Yes, it's pushf with fewer letters and spelled differently... Send a 
      doc
      PR. BTW, I think I understand the phrase about `real mode instructions'
      correctly, but I'd change it to `instructions which mess with the
      physical interrupt flag', as I think that's more correct, as these are
      not necessarily real mode instructions.

      And this is my original typo report:

      The "1.5 boot2 stage" section of the arch-handbook have following text:

      virtual v86 mode. That means, the BTX is a v86 monitor. Real mode
      instructions like posh, popf, cli, sti, if called by the client, will
      work.

      What is "posh" instruction? IMHO it should be changed to "pushf" one.
>How-To-Repeat:
      Just read the "1.5 boot2 stage" section of arch-handbook
>Fix:
      The "posh" instruction should be changed to the "pushf" one
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: ceri 
State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 19 10:13:18 PST 2004 
State-Changed-Why:  
Committed; thanks. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=61585 
>Unformatted:
