From eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su  Thu Oct  9 19:34:07 2003
Return-Path: <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E664216A4B3; Thu,  9 Oct 2003 19:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0F8AF43FEA; Thu,  9 Oct 2003 19:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9A2Y4s6038412;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:04 +0800 (KRAST)
	(envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su)
Received: (from eugen@localhost)
	by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h9A2Y3iY038411;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST)
	(envelope-from eugen)
Message-Id: <200310100234.h9A2Y3iY038411@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST)
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
Reply-To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc: iedowse@freebsd.org
Subject: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         57824
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Oct 09 19:40:21 PDT 2003
>Closed-Date:    Mon Oct 13 00:16:23 PDT 2003
>Last-Modified:  Mon Oct 13 00:16:23 PDT 2003
>Originator:     Eugene Grosbein
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386
>Organization:
Svyaz Service JSC
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD www.svzserv.kemerovo.su 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 5 13:13:56 KRAST 2003 eu@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su:/home4/obj/home/src/sys/WWW i386

>Description:
	device ed requires device miisbus since 4.4-STABLE.
	ed(4) man page does not document this dependency still.
	Ian Dowse said once this is fixed in CURRENT.

>How-To-Repeat:
	man 4 ed

>Fix:

	Perform MFC, it's time.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, iedowse@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:02:58 -0400

 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST)
 Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> wrote:
 
 > 
 > >Number:         57824
 > >Category:       docs
 > >Synopsis:       ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus
 
 NAME
      ed -- ethernet device driver
 
 SYNOPSIS
      device miibus
      device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000
 
 That is in my STABLE tree.
 
 NAME
      ed -- ethernet device driver
 
 SYNOPSIS
      device miibus
      device ed
 
 That is on my current box.
 
 Which branch did you want the MFC to?
 
 -- 
 Tom Rhodes

From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:27:11 +0400 (MSD)

 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, 08:10-0700, Tom Rhodes wrote:
 
 > The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
 > To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
 > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, iedowse@FreeBSD.org
 > Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 >  miibus
 > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:02:58 -0400
 >
 >  On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST)
 >  Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> wrote:
 >
 >  >
 >  > >Number:         57824
 >  > >Category:       docs
 >  > >Synopsis:       ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus
 >
 >  NAME
 >       ed -- ethernet device driver
 >
 >  SYNOPSIS
 >       device miibus
 >       device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000
 >
 >  That is in my STABLE tree.
 >
 >  NAME
 >       ed -- ethernet device driver
 >
 >  SYNOPSIS
 >       device miibus
 >       device ed
 >
 >  That is on my current box.
 >
 >  Which branch did you want the MFC to?
 
 From docs/57824:
 
 >Release:        FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386
 
 -- 
 Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org

From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:57:02 -0400

 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
 Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> wrote:
 
 > The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
 > To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>
 > Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
 > Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 >  miibus
 > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:27:11 +0400 (MSD)
 > 
 >  On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, 08:10-0700, Tom Rhodes wrote:
 >  
 >  > The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >  >
 >  > From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
 >  > To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>
 >  > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, iedowse@FreeBSD.org
 >  > Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 >  >  miibus
 >  > Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:02:58 -0400
 >  >
 >  >  On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST)
 >  >  Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> wrote:
 >  >
 >  >  >
 >  >  > >Number:         57824
 >  >  > >Category:       docs
 >  >  > >Synopsis:       ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus
 >  >
 >  >  NAME
 >  >       ed -- ethernet device driver
 >  >
 >  >  SYNOPSIS
 >  >       device miibus
 >  >       device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000
 >  >
 >  >  That is in my STABLE tree.
 >  >
 >  >  NAME
 >  >       ed -- ethernet device driver
 >  >
 >  >  SYNOPSIS
 >  >       device miibus
 >  >       device ed
 >  >
 >  >  That is on my current box.
 >  >
 >  >  Which branch did you want the MFC to?
 >  
 >  From docs/57824:
 >  
 >  >Release:        FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386
 
 It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something
 this trivial to a past release branch?  The GENERIC config file
 explains what devices require miibus(4).  So does the handbook,
 and the LINT file.
 
 -- 
 Tom Rhodes

From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:00:51 +0400 (MSD)

 [...]
 > >  >Release:        FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386
 >
 > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something
 > this trivial to a past release branch?  The GENERIC config file
 > explains what devices require miibus(4).  So does the handbook,
 > and the LINT file.
 
 I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9.
 
 -- 
 Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org

From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:20:29 +0300

 On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:00:51PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
 > [...]
 > > >  >Release:        FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386
 > >
 > > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something
 > > this trivial to a past release branch?  The GENERIC config file
 > > explains what devices require miibus(4).  So does the handbook,
 > > and the LINT file.
 > 
 > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9.
 
 Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'?  What Tom is saying is that
 the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was
 formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due
 to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents
 that ed needs miibus.  I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage
 shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section.
 
 This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th,
 committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :)
 
 G'luck,
 Peter
 
 -- 
 Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net    roam@sbnd.net    roam@FreeBSD.org
 PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
 Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
 If this sentence were in Chinese, it would say something else.

From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Cc: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:03:31 -0400

 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:20:29 +0300
 Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote:
 
 > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:00:51PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
 > > [...]
 > > > >  >Release:        FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE i386
 > > >
 > > > It's fixed for the next release; is it normal to MFC something
 > > > this trivial to a past release branch?  The GENERIC config file
 > > > explains what devices require miibus(4).  So does the handbook,
 > > > and the LINT file.
 > > 
 > > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9.
 > 
 > Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'?  What Tom is saying is that
 > the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was
 > formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due
 > to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents
 > that ed needs miibus.  I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage
 > shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section.
 > 
 > This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th,
 > committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :)
 
 I've done so much -doc that I completely forgot that I did this!
 
 Thanks for pointing this out, I think this PR can be closed now.  What
 does our submitter say?
 
 -- 
 Tom Rhodes

From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:28:51 +0400 (MSD)

 [...]
 >  > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9.
 >
 >  Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'?  What Tom is saying is that
 >  the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was
 >  formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due
 >  to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents
 >  that ed needs miibus.  I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage
 >  shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section.
 >
 >  This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th,
 >  committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :)
 
 You are quite right :-)
 
 -- 
 Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org

From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su>,
	FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, iedowse@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requiresmiibus
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:17:12 +0800

 Tom Rhodes wrote:
 > 
 > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:34:03 +0800 (KRAST)
 > Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> wrote:
 > 
 > >
 > > >Number:         57824
 > > >Category:       docs
 > > >Synopsis:       ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires miibus
 > 
 > NAME
 >      ed -- ethernet device driver
 > 
 > SYNOPSIS
 >      device miibus
 >      device ed0 at isa? port 0x280 irq 5 iomem 0xd8000
 > 
 > That is in my STABLE tree.
 
 I'm sorry, my 'man 4 ed' shows me /usr/share/man/cat4/ed.4.gz
 that is staled since 2001. Please close this PR.
 
 Eugene Grosbein
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: roam 
State-Changed-When: Mon Oct 13 00:15:57 PDT 2003 
State-Changed-Why:  
Submitter agrees that the change has already been MFC'd :) 
Still, thanks for reporting what you thought was a genuine FreeBSD problem! 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=57824 
>Unformatted:
