From chris@unixpages.org  Thu May  8 16:19:14 2003
Return-Path: <chris@unixpages.org>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C4E1D37B401; Thu,  8 May 2003 16:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.181.92])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D438A43FB1; Thu,  8 May 2003 16:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from chris@unixpages.org)
Received: from gondor.middleearth (gondor.middleearth [192.168.1.42])
	by haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0E098C1DC; Fri,  9 May 2003 01:19:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by gondor.middleearth (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 9C3E546D0; Fri,  9 May 2003 01:19:09 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20030508231909.GO609@unixpages.org>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 01:19:09 +0200
From: Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org>
To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-doc@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20030508134407.638ff0c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: PR: docs/37221 && docs/51886: mount_nfs(8) options.
References: <20030508134407.638ff0c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>

>Number:         51988
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       Re: PR: docs/37221 && docs/51886: mount_nfs(8) options.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    gnats-admin
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu May 08 16:20:11 PDT 2003
>Closed-Date:    Mon May 19 16:25:02 PDT 2003
>Last-Modified:  Mon May 19 16:25:02 PDT 2003
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 --8G1nIWD3RY794FAy
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:44:07PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote:
 > Josh, Lars,
 >=20
 > After looking over this a little closer, I'm totally lost at why these
 > PRs were filed.
 >=20
 > -p is listed in the manual page as a historic and deprecated option.
 > -P is listed in the manual page as obsolete.
 >=20
 > I can understand removing them both from the usage message, however
 > they seem to be documented fine in the manual page (as obsolete).
 >=20
 > Currently I have an email in to murray and bmah about this, and
 > my personal opinion is that the manual page is fine.
 >=20
 > Any opinions on just removing the -P and -p option from the code
 > and leaving the manual page as is?  What do the other -doc committers
 > think about this?
 >=20
 
 Apparently mbr removed ISO support from the code a while ago (which
 didn't work anyway) and these are leftovers.
 It's not fatal if this stays in, but as it's something that isn't
 even implemented anymore, it would be nice to be thrown out.
 
 - Christian
 
 --=20
 Christian Brueffer	chris@unixpages.org	brueffer@FreeBSD.org
 GPG Key:	 http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
 GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
 
 --8G1nIWD3RY794FAy
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
 
 iD8DBQE+uuXtbHYXjKDtmC0RApKhAJ42CLIHZ2WEzJwx4lfRNcylzL49NwCcDLyU
 ThWVYAF1yPWgFviDR0wZVcM=
 =aFlf
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --8G1nIWD3RY794FAy--
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: keramida 
State-Changed-When: Mon May 19 16:24:25 PDT 2003 
State-Changed-Why:  
Followup to docs/37221 misfiled as a new PR. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=51988 
>Unformatted:
