From trhodes@FreeBSD.org  Thu May  8 10:47:26 2003
Return-Path: <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1D54637B401; Thu,  8 May 2003 10:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CAF1543F3F; Thu,  8 May 2003 10:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (acs-24-154-229-196.zoominternet.net [24.154.229.196])
	by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h48HlNZK059337;
	Thu, 8 May 2003 13:47:23 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <20030508134407.638ff0c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 13:44:07 -0400
From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: PR: docs/37221 && docs/51886: mount_nfs(8) options.

>Number:         51981
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       Re: PR: docs/37221 && docs/51886: mount_nfs(8) options.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    gnats-admin
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu May 08 10:50:06 PDT 2003
>Closed-Date:    Mon May 19 16:24:23 PDT 2003
>Last-Modified:  Mon May 19 16:24:23 PDT 2003
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 Josh, Lars,
 
 After looking over this a little closer, I'm totally lost at why these
 PRs were filed.
 
 -p is listed in the manual page as a historic and deprecated option.
 -P is listed in the manual page as obsolete.
 
 I can understand removing them both from the usage message, however
 they seem to be documented fine in the manual page (as obsolete).
 
 Currently I have an email in to murray and bmah about this, and
 my personal opinion is that the manual page is fine.
 
 Any opinions on just removing the -P and -p option from the code
 and leaving the manual page as is?  What do the other -doc committers
 think about this?
 
 --
 Tom Rhodes
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: keramida 
State-Changed-When: Mon May 19 16:24:05 PDT 2003 
State-Changed-Why:  
Followup to docs/37221 misfileed as a new PR. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=51981 
>Unformatted:
