From nobody@FreeBSD.org  Sat Mar 16 13:41:25 2002
Return-Path: <nobody@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9EE37B485
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 13:41:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2GLfKj67544;
	Sat, 16 Mar 2002 13:41:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <200203162141.g2GLfKj67544@freefall.freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 13:41:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Shill <shill@free.fr>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: socket(2) man page minor correction
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         35987
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       socket(2) man page minor correction
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Mar 16 13:50:01 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:    Sun Mar 17 17:52:42 PST 2002
>Last-Modified:  Sun Mar 17 17:52:42 PST 2002
>Originator:     Shill
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
"The currently understood formats are:
PF_LOCAL  Host-internal protocols, formerly called PF_UNIX,
PF_UNIX   Host-internal protocols, depreciated, use PF_LOCAL,"

Shouldn't we use *deprecated* instead of *depreciated*?
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/deprecated.html

For an interesting discussion on deprecated vs. depreciated:
http://ltsc.ieee.org/logs/glossary/msg00122.html
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:
      
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: dd 
State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 17 17:52:30 PST 2002 
State-Changed-Why:  
Fixed, thanks. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=35987 
>Unformatted:
