From dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org  Tue Jan 15 23:55:21 2002
Return-Path: <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>
Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9C0E937B417; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 23:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gate.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@localhost)
	by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with BSMTP id g0G7t4T03637; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:55:04 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org)
Message-Id: <D2rbXMawKe@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:52:57 +0100
From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer)
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, dwhite@FreeBSD.org,
	lioux@FreeBSD.org, yds@CoolRat.org (Yarema)
Subject: Re: Section 15.15 of the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook needs
	to be updated.
References: <courier.3C44B2D6.00011FC0@CoolRat.org>

>Number:         33935
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       Re: Section 15.15 of the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook needs
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    gnats-admin
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Jan 16 00:00:04 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:    Wed Jan 23 16:51:45 PST 2002
>Last-Modified:  Thu Oct 07 18:31:43 GMT 2004
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 Hi Yarema,
 
 > to bring them all in sync.  Changes include adding user 'bind' UID 53 to
 > the top of the list, adding user 'courier' and sorting the list by UID so
 > that future UID duplication is easier to avoid.  User 'bind' UID 53 already
 > exists in /usr/src/etc/master.passwd and this section documents UIDs 50
 > through 999.  So user 'bind' clearly needs to be documented here.
 > 
 > Of interest to the mail/sendmail port is that I removed:
 > 
 > smmsp:*:90:90:Sendmail Queue:/nonexistent:/nonexistent
 > 
 > since user 'smmsp' already exists as UID 25 in /usr/src/etc/master.passwd --
 > patching the mail/sendmail port to use UID 25 instad of 90 makes more sense
 > (to me at least).
 
 1) The sendmail port uses an already existiting UID/GID and does not remove it.
 2) It may violate POLA to make the sendmail port create this UID/GID on
    older FreeBSD-Systems with 25 instead of 90.
 
 kind regards Dirk
 
 - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: keramida 
State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 23 16:51:45 PST 2002 
State-Changed-Why:  
Misfiled reply to ports/33929. 
I added relevant parts to the audit trail of 33929. 
Please add the number of the PR you're following up near the beginning 
of your subject lines.  I use subject lines of: 

Subject: Re: category/number: original subject 

where category/subject in this case was ports/33929. 

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=33935 
>Unformatted:
 	to be updated.
