From foxfair@drago.fomokka.net  Sun Apr 15 10:13:47 2007
Return-Path: <foxfair@drago.fomokka.net>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB4816A400
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 10:13:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from foxfair@drago.fomokka.net)
Received: from drago.fomokka.net (drago.fomokka.net [140.117.205.233])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0AE13C459
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 10:13:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from foxfair@drago.fomokka.net)
Received: by drago.fomokka.net (Mail Daemon, from userid 1001)
	id EDF17FB5CC9; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:13:46 +0800 (CST)
Message-Id: <20070415101346.EDF17FB5CC9@drago.fomokka.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:13:46 +0800 (CST)
From: Foxfair Hu <foxfair@drago.fomokka.net>
Reply-To: Foxfair Hu <foxfair@drago.fomokka.net>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Note the dependency checking command in Porter's handbook
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         111594
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       Note the dependency checking command in Porter's handbook
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    foxfair
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Apr 15 10:20:02 GMT 2007
>Closed-Date:    Thu Apr 19 14:44:34 GMT 2007
>Last-Modified:  Thu Apr 19 14:44:34 GMT 2007
>Originator:     Foxfair Hu
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD drago.fomokka.net 4.11-STABLE FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 15 09:18:16 CST 2007 tjs@drago.fomokka.net:/da2/obj/ad0/src/sys/DRAGO i386

>Description:
The new command 'make missing' is not mentioned anyway in our docs.
Since it is a such useful command, we should let porters know it.

>How-To-Repeat:
	
>Fix:
Apply this patch:
-----patch start-----
diff -ruN /usr/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml ./book.sgml
--- /usr/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml	Thu Apr 12 00:03:14 2007
+++ ./book.sgml	Sun Apr 15 18:11:43 2007
@@ -3147,7 +3147,8 @@
 	  you can use to ensure that all the required bits will be on the
 	  user's machine.  There are also some pre-supported dependency
 	  variables for common cases, plus a few more to control the behavior
-	  of dependencies.</para>
+	  of dependencies. You can use <replaceable>'make missing'</replaceable>
+          command to check the dependencies of one port.</para>
 
 	<sect2>
 	  <title><makevar>LIB_DEPENDS</makevar></title>


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback 
State-Changed-By: foxfair 
State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 15 10:23:43 UTC 2007 
State-Changed-Why:  
I'll take this baby 


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-doc->foxfair 
Responsible-Changed-By: foxfair 
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Apr 15 10:23:43 UTC 2007 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
I'll take this baby 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=111594 

From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, foxfair@drago.fomokka.net
Cc:  
Subject: Re: docs/111594: Note the dependency checking command in Porter's
	handbook
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:49:21 +0200

 It's mentioned in ports(7) in HEAD. That man page could use an MFC to
 STABLE, I guess.
 
 -- 
 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
               <pav@FreeBSD.org>
 
 It's the classic Microsoft security-bulletin formula: "The vulnerability
 is important (never dangerous); you have nothing to fear and no reason
 to regret trusting us; we have no intention of apologizing for it or
 even explaining it adequately; now go get your patch, shut up, and be
 grateful nothing bad has happened.
   -- The Register
 

From: Foxfair Hu <foxfair@drago.fomokka.net>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/111594: Note the dependency checking command in Porter's
 handbook
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:21:50 +0800

 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
 > It's mentioned in ports(7) in HEAD. That man page could use an MFC to
 > STABLE, I guess.
 > 
 
 Are you planning to make this MFC'ed soon? It's just a two-line patch 
 like this:
 
 --- ports.7.orig        Tue Apr 17 01:17:58 2007
 +++ ports.7     Tue Apr 17 01:21:29 2007
 @@ -199,6 +199,8 @@
   .It Cm pretty-print-run-depends-list , pretty-print-build-depends-list
   Print a list of all the compile and run dependencies, and dependencies
   of those dependencies.
 +.It Cm missing
 +Print a list of missing dependencies to be installed for the port.
   .It Cm clean
   Remove the expanded source code.
   This recurses to dependencies unless
 
 
 
 foxfair
 

From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: Foxfair Hu <foxfair@drago.fomokka.net>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/111594: Note the dependency checking command in Porter's
	handbook
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:49:31 +0200

 > Are you planning to make this MFC'ed soon? It's just a two-line patch 
 > like this:
 
 I have just MFCed ports.7 from HEAD to RELENG_6.
 
 -- 
 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
               <pav@FreeBSD.org>
 
 Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, for they are subtle and
 quick to anger.
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed 
State-Changed-By: foxfair 
State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 19 14:43:27 UTC 2007 
State-Changed-Why:  
ports(7) got MFC'ed by pav@, close PR 


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=111594 
>Unformatted:
