From sef@kithrup.com  Sat Mar 28 21:33:14 1998
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03114
          for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sat, 28 Mar 1998 21:33:14 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from sef@kithrup.com)
Received: (from sef@localhost)
	by kithrup.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA05928;
	Sat, 28 Mar 1998 21:33:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sef)
Message-Id: <199803290533.VAA05928@kithrup.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 21:33:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>
Reply-To: sef@kithrup.com
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: 2.2.6 kerberos servers are awfully visible
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2

>Number:         6161
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       2.2.6 kerberos servers are awfully visible
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    assar
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Mar 28 21:40:01 PST 1998
>Closed-Date:    Thu Aug 26 03:04:55 GMT 2004
>Last-Modified:  Thu Aug 26 03:04:55 GMT 2004
>Originator:     Sean Eric Fagan
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE i386
>Organization:
Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
>Environment:

FreeBSD-2.2.6, just updated March 28, 1998.

>Description:

The kerberos and kadmind server are showing up in 'netstat -f inet' output,
when they did not before.  And, they're showing up multiple times.  This did
not used to be the case, and is somewhat disconcerting.

>How-To-Repeat:

	
netstat -f inet

Active Internet connections
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address          Foreign Address        (state)
tcp        0      0  localhost.kerberos-sec *.*                    LISTEN
tcp        0      0  localhost.kerberos-iv  *.*                    LISTEN
tcp        0      0  kithrup.kerberos-sec   *.*                    LISTEN
tcp        0      0  kithrup.kerberos-iv    *.*                    LISTEN
udp        0      0  localhost.kerberos-sec *.*                   
udp        0      0  localhost.kerberos-iv  *.*                   
udp        0      0  kithrup.kerberos-sec   *.*                   
udp        0      0  kithrup.kerberos-iv    *.*                   

>Fix:
	
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback 
State-Changed-By: johan 
State-Changed-When: Mon Aug 14 02:48:42 PDT 2000 
State-Changed-Why:  
Sean Eric, can you please tell us if this problem is still 
present in more recent releases of FreeBSD. 




Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->markm 
Responsible-Changed-By: johan 
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Aug 14 02:48:42 PDT 2000 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Over to maintainer. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=6161 
Responsible-Changed-From-To: markm->assar 
Responsible-Changed-By: johan 
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Aug 14 03:48:40 PDT 2000 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
I was told that Assar is one of the authors of this code 
and we let him deal with this instead. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=6161 

From: assar@freebsd.org
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc: sef@kithrup.com
Subject: Re: bin/6161: 2.2.6 kerberos servers are awfully visible
Date: 21 Feb 2001 05:15:11 +0100

 > The kerberos and kadmind server are showing up in 'netstat -f inet' output,
 > when they did not before.
 
 In the output you enclose, there's no admin server as far as I can
 tell?
 
 > And, they're showing up multiple times.
 
 The reason for this is that it's not possible to get the destination
 address of UDP packets sent by just listening on INADDR_ANY, so the
 server binds one socket for every interface, much the same way as bind
 does.
 
 > This did not used to be the case, and is somewhat disconcerting.
 
 Why do you find it disconcerting?  They need to listen to the network
 after all.
 
 /assar
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed 
State-Changed-By: linimon 
State-Changed-When: Thu Aug 26 03:04:20 GMT 2004 
State-Changed-Why:  
The best I can tell, this antique PR should have been closed a long 
time ago with "yes, that's how it works, all right." 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=6161 
>Unformatted:
