From sdb@ssr.com  Thu Feb 27 07:19:34 2003
Return-Path: <sdb@ssr.com>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E02B37B401
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from redhotmomma.ssr.com (ns.ssr.com [199.4.235.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 634D943F3F
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:19:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sdb@ssr.com)
Received: (qmail 29961 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 15:18:57 -0000
Received: from kimchee.ssr.com (199.4.235.5)
  by ns.ssr.com with QMQP; 27 Feb 2003 15:18:57 -0000
Message-Id: <20030227151857.2180.qmail@kimchee.ssr.com>
Date: 27 Feb 2003 15:18:57 -0000
From: Scott Ballantyne <sdb@ssr.com>
Reply-To: Scott Ballantyne <sdb@ssr.com>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: inetd depends on portmap
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         48749
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       inetd depends on portmap
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Feb 27 07:20:10 PST 2003
>Closed-Date:    Tue Mar 04 13:58:15 PST 2003
>Last-Modified:  Tue Mar 04 13:58:15 PST 2003
>Originator:     Scott Ballantyne
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
ScotSoft Research
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD kimchee.ssr.com 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #4: Mon Jan 13 07:29:39 EST 2003 sdb@kimchee.ssr.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/KIMCHEE i386


>Description:
	If inetd is enabled without enabling portmap on an install,
	mysterious failures on non-rpc services can result since while inetd
	is waiting for the portmapper response it won't service other requests.

	Enable inetd without enabling amd or being an nfs server
	(i.e., nfs client only). 
>How-To-Repeat:
	Enable inetd without enabling amd or becoming an nfs server
	(nfs client only, for example). Uncomment (as an example) ftpd
	or talkd and (for example) rstatd rusersd. HUP inetd. talkd
	will fail since it cannot connect to local daemon. After a
	while, it will work. Then it will fail again.

>Fix:
	Add chkdepend inetd inetd_enable portmap portmap_enable to /etc/rc.
	Or add a comment to the appropriate place in the inetd.conf
	file for morons like me:-)

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: Scott Ballantyne <sdb@ssr.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/48749: inetd depends on portmap
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:31:53 +0000

 On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:18:57PM -0000, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
 
 > 	Or add a comment to the appropriate place in the inetd.conf
 > 	file for morons like me:-)
 
 Something like this, you mean ?
 
 # RPC based services (you MUST have portmapper running to use these) 
 #
 #rstatd/1-3     dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.rstatd  rpc.rstatd
 #rusersd/1-2    dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.rusersd rpc.rusersd
 #walld/1        dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.rwalld  rpc.rwalld
 #pcnfsd/1-2     dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.pcnfsd  rpc.pcnfsd
 #rquotad/1      dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.rquotad rpc.rquotad
 #sprayd/1       dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.sprayd  rpc.sprayd
 
 
 Ceri

From: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bin/48749: inetd depends on portmap
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 00:03:37 +0000

 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 For the audit trail.
 
 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
 Content-Type: message/rfc822
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 Return-path: <sdb@ssr.com>
 Envelope-to: ceri@submonkey.net
 Delivery-date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 00:00:47 +0000
 Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk ([212.250.77.214])
 	by rhadamanth.submonkey.net with esmtp (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
 	(Exim 4.12)
 	id 18ouQp-0001mq-00
 	for ceri@submonkey.net; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 00:00:47 +0000
 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([216.136.204.119])
 	by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
 	id 18ouQo-000NNS-00
 	for ceri@submonkey.net; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 00:00:46 +0000
 Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18])
 	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8031C5558B
 	for <ceri@submonkey.net>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:00:45 -0800 (PST)
 	(envelope-from sdb@ssr.com)
 Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 	id 7DA5237B405; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:00:45 -0800 (PST)
 Delivered-To: ceri@freebsd.org
 Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
 	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A68537B401
 	for <ceri@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:00:45 -0800 (PST)
 Received: from redhotmomma.ssr.com (ns.ssr.com [199.4.235.2])
 	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59D3C43F85
 	for <ceri@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:00:44 -0800 (PST)
 	(envelope-from sdb@ssr.com)
 Received: (qmail 15086 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 23:59:50 -0000
 Received: from kimchee.ssr.com (199.4.235.5)
   by ns.ssr.com with QMQP; 28 Feb 2003 23:59:50 -0000
 Date: 28 Feb 2003 23:59:40 -0000
 Message-ID: <20030228235940.278.qmail@kimchee.ssr.com>
 From: Scott Ballantyne <sdb@ssr.com>
 To: ceri@FreeBSD.org
 In-reply-to: <20030228223153.GA3569@submonkey.net> (message from Ceri Davies
 	on Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:31:53 +0000)
 Subject: Re: bin/48749: inetd depends on portmap
 References: <20030227151857.2180.qmail@kimchee.ssr.com> <20030228223153.GA3569@submonkey.net>
 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.8 required=5.0
 	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
 	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES
 	autolearn=ham	version=2.50
 X-Spam-Level: 
 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
 
 Yes, or perhaps "warning: portmap may not be enabled by default" would
 be better.
 
 Thanks!
 Scott
 --
 sdb@ssr.com
 
 
 
 > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:31:53 +0000
 > From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
 > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
 > Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>,
 > 	Scott Ballantyne <sdb@ssr.com>, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
 > Content-Disposition: inline
 > Sender: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>
 > 
 > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:18:57PM -0000, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
 > 
 > > 	Or add a comment to the appropriate place in the inetd.conf
 > > 	file for morons like me:-)
 > 
 > Something like this, you mean ?
 > 
 > # RPC based services (you MUST have portmapper running to use these) 
 > #
 > #rstatd/1-3     dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.rstatd  rpc.rstatd
 > #rusersd/1-2    dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.rusersd rpc.rusersd
 > #walld/1        dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.rwalld  rpc.rwalld
 > #pcnfsd/1-2     dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.pcnfsd  rpc.pcnfsd
 > #rquotad/1      dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.rquotad rpc.rquotad
 > #sprayd/1       dgram rpc/udp wait root /usr/libexec/rpc.sprayd  rpc.sprayd
 > 
 > 
 > Ceri
 > 
 
 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: dwmalone 
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 4 13:56:34 PST 2003 
State-Changed-Why:  
inetd.conf already has a warning message. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=48749 
>Unformatted:
