From rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com  Sun May 14 12:16:51 1995
Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA23008
          for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sun, 14 May 1995 12:16:48 -0700
Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA04164; Sun, 14 May 1995 12:16:42 -0700
Message-Id: <199505141916.MAA04164@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 1995 12:16:42 -0700
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
Reply-To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: bad144
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2

>Number:         410
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       bad144(8) should probably scan the bad block remap sectors
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun May 14 12:20:02 1995
>Closed-Date:    Fri Dec 1 03:07:18 PST 1995
>Last-Modified:  Fri Dec  1 03:08:15 PST 1995
>Originator:     Rodney W. Grimes
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.1.0-Development i386
>Organization:
Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company                   Custom computers for FreeBSD
>Environment:

	FreeBSD 2.0.5 and later that support bad144 -s processing

>Description:
	From Bruce Evans:
	Actually it would be a good idea to check the 126 + (5 * 2 -1) sectors
	beyond the above `bend' and complain louder if any are bad.  I'm not
	sure if bad144 handles recursive remapping of bad sectors!  I think
	it handles bad sectors in the bad sector table itself OK.  There are
	5 copies of the table, and the first good one is used.

>How-To-Repeat:

	Find a disk with a bad block in the bad144 spare sector area
	and note that bad144 -s does not find it.   Not sure what will
	happen if bad144 goes to remap a block into this area and finds
	that the remap block is bad.

>Fix:

	For bad144 change bend to size in the scan loop, for the
	kernel handling of recursive mapping unknown.

Index: bad144.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/bad144/bad144.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -c -r1.7 bad144.c
*** 1.7	1995/05/14 08:40:37
--- bad144.c	1995/05/14 19:15:12
***************
*** 221,227 ****
  		printf("Starting scan of %s at cylinder %ld\n",
  			name, bstart/spc);
  		step = trk;
! 		for (curr_sec = bstart; curr_sec < bend; curr_sec += step) {
  			int gotone = 0;
  
  			if (verbose) {
--- 221,227 ----
  		printf("Starting scan of %s at cylinder %ld\n",
  			name, bstart/spc);
  		step = trk;
! 		for (curr_sec = bstart; curr_sec < size; curr_sec += step) {
  			int gotone = 0;
  
  			if (verbose) {

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: phk 
State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 1 03:07:18 PST 1995 
State-Changed-Why:  
I commit the change, hoping that somebody will notice if it breaks 
anything before 2.2 hits the road. 
>Unformatted:


