From sam@antinea.enst.fr  Fri Jan 12 01:53:53 2001
Return-Path: <sam@antinea.enst.fr>
Received: from ada.eu.org (marvin.enst.fr [137.194.161.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A7C37B69B
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 01:53:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from antinea.enst.fr (antinea.enst.fr [137.194.160.145])
	by ada.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D32019090
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:53:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: by antinea.enst.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 70A2D326; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:53:43 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <20010112095343.70A2D326@antinea.enst.fr>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:53:43 +0100 (CET)
From: sam@inf.enst.fr
Sender: sam@antinea.enst.fr
Reply-To: sam@inf.enst.fr
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: fsck should notice some inconsistencies
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         24270
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       fsck should notice some inconsistencies
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Jan 12 02:00:01 PST 2001
>Closed-Date:    Wed Jul 18 20:52:32 PDT 2001
>Last-Modified:  Wed Jul 18 20:55:48 PDT 2001
>Originator:     Samuel Tardieu
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
TELECOM Paris
>Environment:
	FreeBSD -CURRENT
>Description:
	A *baaaaad* crash happened on my /usr partition (my fault). fsck
	was able to recover a lot of files, but segfaults on several "files"
	whose size is much greater than the one of the partition itself.
	fsck should notice that and clear the inode (which is the only action
	left, thanks to clri) instead of segfaulting.
>How-To-Repeat:
	How to repeat? Don't :-)
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: mike 
State-Changed-When: Wed Jul 18 20:52:32 PDT 2001 
State-Changed-Why:  

There aren't enough details to make use of this PR.  There 
have been numerous changes to fsck(8), so it's probable 
that the problem the orginator experienced has been fixed. 


http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24270 
>Unformatted:
