From brian@Awfulhak.org  Mon Jun 19 14:47:37 2000
Return-Path: <brian@Awfulhak.org>
Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.139.170])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCD637B682
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 14:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org)
Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12])
	by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA20002;
	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:47:33 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org)
Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA23017;
	Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:46:50 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org)
Message-Id: <200006192146.WAA23017@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:46:50 +0100
From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>
To: Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org,
	Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org
In-Reply-To: Message from Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> 
   of "Mon, 19 Jun 2000 23:00:17 +0300." <200006192000.XAA83914@ady.warpnet.ro> 
Subject: Re: PPP route deletion bug/possible DoS 

>Number:         19386
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       Re: PPP route deletion bug/possible DoS
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    gnats-admin
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Jun 19 14:50:01 PDT 2000
>Closed-Date:    Tue Jul 11 02:48:26 PDT 2000
>Last-Modified:  Wed Oct 26 05:54:34 GMT 2005
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 > 
 > >Submitter-Id:   current-users
 > >Originator:     Adrian Penisoara
 > >Organization:   Warp Net Technologies
 > >Confidential:   no
 > >Synopsis:       PPP route deletion bug/possible DoS
 
 Thanks - it's now fixed in current, stable and releng 3, although 
 in a slightly different way (to avoid possible garbage in the 
 sdl_data field (after sdl_nlen bytes) and to avoid repeating the 
 strlen().
 
 Thanks for the report.
 -- 
 Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org>                        <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
       <http://www.Awfulhak.org>                   <brian@[uk.].org>
 Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
 
 
 
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: asmodai 
State-Changed-When: Tue Jul 11 02:48:26 PDT 2000 
State-Changed-Why:  
Misfiled. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=19386 
>Unformatted:
