From markd@Kermodei.COM Sun Dec  5 11:03:21 1999
Return-Path: <markd@Kermodei.COM>
Received: from kermodei.com (kermodei.com [216.103.110.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F032C14CC3
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sun,  5 Dec 1999 11:03:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from markd@Kermodei.COM)
Received: (from markd@localhost)
	by kermodei.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA03058;
	Sun, 5 Dec 1999 11:03:19 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from markd)
Message-Id: <199912051903.LAA03058@kermodei.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 11:03:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Mark Diekhans <markd@Kermodei.COM>
Reply-To: markd@Kermodei.COM
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: unhelpful error message from brandelf
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2

>Number:         15285
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       unhelpful error message from brandelf
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    wes
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Dec  5 11:10:00 PST 1999
>Closed-Date:    Tue Jun 27 10:43:58 PDT 2000
>Last-Modified:  Tue Jun 27 10:50:32 PDT 2000
>Originator:     Mark Diekhans
>Release:        FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:


>Description:

brandelf does not give a complete usage message if no arguments are specified,
instead one gets:
        brandelf: no file(s) specified

The usage message should be included as well:
        brandelf: no file(s) specified
        usage: brandelf [-f] [-v] [-t string] file ...

which is what it does if you give a bogus option

>How-To-Repeat:


>Fix:
	


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: "Ahmed Benani" <ahmed_benani@urbanet.ch>
To: markd@Kermodei.COM, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:  
Subject: Re : bin/15285: unhelpful error message from brandelf
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 01:35:21 +0100

 STOP SENDING YOUR MESSAGES I RECEIVED MORE THAN 200 PER DAY AND I NEVER
 UBSCRIBE TO YOUR LIST: THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION
 ahmed_benani@urbanet.ch
 ----------
 >De=A0: Mark Diekhans <markd@Kermodei.COM>
 >=C0 : FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
 >Objet=A0: bin/15285: unhelpful error message from brandelf
 >Date=A0: Dim 5 d=E9c 1999 20:03
 >
 
 >
 >>Number:         15285
 >>Category:       bin
 >>Synopsis:       unhelpful error message from brandelf
 >>Confidential:   no
 >>Severity:       non-critical
 >>Priority:       low
 >>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
 >>State:          open
 >>Quarter:        
 >>Keywords:       
 >>Date-Required:
 >>Class:          sw-bug
 >>Submitter-Id:   current-users
 >>Arrival-Date:   Sun Dec  5 11:10:00 PST 1999
 >>Closed-Date:
 >>Last-Modified:
 >>Originator:     Mark Diekhans
 >>Release:        FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386
 >>Organization:
 >>Environment:
 >
 >
 >>Description:
 >
 >brandelf does not give a complete usage message if no arguments are specif=
 ied,
 >instead one gets:
 >        brandelf: no file(s) specified
 >
 >The usage message should be included as well:
 >        brandelf: no file(s) specified
 >        usage: brandelf [-f] [-v] [-t string] file ...
 >
 >which is what it does if you give a bogus option
 >
 >>How-To-Repeat:
 >
 >
 >>Fix:
 > 
 >
 >
 >>Release-Note:
 >>Audit-Trail:
 >>Unformatted:
 >
 >
 >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
 >with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
 >
 >
 
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->wes 
Responsible-Changed-By: wes 
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jan 3 18:26:03 PST 2000 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
I'm fixing it. 
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback 
State-Changed-By: wes 
State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 3 18:34:34 PST 2000 
State-Changed-Why:  
Give it a week, then MFC. 
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open 
State-Changed-By: wes 
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 22 20:41:44 PST 2000 
State-Changed-Why:  
Time to MFC this, I guess.  Nobody's noticed, let alone complained. 
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: wes 
State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 27 10:43:58 PDT 2000 
State-Changed-Why:  
Finally MFC'd the change.  Nobody commented on it, so it must no 
have broken much in -current. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=15285 
>Unformatted:
