From mark@linus.demon.co.uk  Wed Jun 26 17:40:32 1996
Received: from linus.demon.co.uk (linus.demon.co.uk [158.152.10.220])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA08730
          for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 1996 17:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mark@localhost) by linus.demon.co.uk (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA06778; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 01:38:32 GMT
Message-Id: <199606270138.BAA06778@linus.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 01:38:32 +0000
From: mark@linus.demon.co.uk (Mark Valentine)
To: Keith Bostic <bostic@bsdi.com>
Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org,
        gnats@freefall.freebsd.org, mckusick@McKusick.COM, plm@xs4all.nl
In-Reply-To: Keith Bostic's message of Jun 26,  6:01pm
Subject: Re: New bug introduced with sed bugfix

>Number:         1354
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       Re: New bug introduced with sed bugfix
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    gnats-admin
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Jun 26 17:50:01 PDT 1996
>Closed-Date:    Wed Jul 3 15:58:02 PDT 1996
>Last-Modified:  Tue Nov 27 19:22:20 PST 2001
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: mpp 
State-Changed-When: Wed Jul 3 15:58:02 PDT 1996 
State-Changed-Why:  
Bogus PR. 
>Unformatted:
> From: Keith Bostic <bostic@bsdi.com>
> Date: Wed 26 Jun, 1996
> Subject: Re: New bug introduced with sed bugfix

> >> Remove revision 1.5 from compile.c
> >> This was supposed to fix a bug in dealing with continuation lines
> >> but somehow introduced this bug.
> >  
> >  My old patch attached to the (now closed) PR bin/908 fixes the original
> >  problem without introducing the new one.
> 
> We discovered that the change wasn't right when we were reviewing
> my change internally -- I apologize for not forwarding a message
> when we found it!
> 
> Here's the change that we ended up making.  I won't swear that
> it's right, but it hasn't broken yet.  ;-}

Umm, that looks awfully like the same patch that was committed as revision
1.5... :-(  Try it with the test case in PR bin/1350.

(I suspect you just forwarded the wrong diff here.)

		Cheers,

		Mark.

-- 
Mark Valentine at Home <mailto:mv@pobox.com> <http://www.pobox.com/~mv/>
