Posts by trystimuli@xn--lofll-1sat.is
 (DIR) Post #AccDtkkmVlK4EnItUW by trystimuli@xn--lofll-1sat.is
       2023-12-08T23:55:24Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mjg59 vi with emacs bindings maybe.okay, someone has actually done that. but, but! there is also vim "readline style insertion" which, abbreviated vim-rsi, is just asking to be backronymed as vim repetitive strain injury.
       
 (DIR) Post #AdMtkT7xCyWqu40n8C by trystimuli@xn--lofll-1sat.is
       2023-12-31T12:21:21Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mjg59 I don't know any case law, but my understanding is that technical measures in DCMA 1201 is usually interpreted quite broadly. It seems irrelevant to section 1201 whether you have a license key in the first place, generating your own license key is circumventing a technical measure that effectively controls access to the work, even if you only generated a license key for fewer seats than you have a license for.
       
 (DIR) Post #AdMui3nUVufHibr7jM by trystimuli@xn--lofll-1sat.is
       2023-12-31T12:31:34Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mjg59 The whole thing about the DCMA is that it's not about whether you enabled copyright infringement, but whether the circumvention could be used to do so.