Posts by rv@infosec.exchange
(DIR) Post #APbDnQw4gjvBuDfECO by rv@infosec.exchange
2022-11-14T16:03:43Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@molly0xfff :clap_claw: congratulations! :clap_claw:
(DIR) Post #AvsJC4EMrdVDHTMRJw by rv@infosec.exchange
2025-07-01T19:41:12Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@briankrebs @aj this is up there with how we used to talk about how, oh, in China you can't say Tiananmen, you have to write it in code like May 35 or 64. But now Americans and others say unalive and 🍇
(DIR) Post #Ay7HKmV7QYBNtrZtlg by rv@infosec.exchange
2025-09-12T02:45:24Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@foone considering ROI is a leveling up of the shitposting maturity model
(DIR) Post #AzsAIsxtwpAQhDSMyG by rv@infosec.exchange
2025-11-03T15:30:39Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@ricci this is recommended in Yet Another Modern Language Association Style (YAMLA Style)
(DIR) Post #B0Hf8GpGzT8oTsiGOG by rv@infosec.exchange
2025-11-15T22:43:58Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tomjennings @ai6yr groan this is not an example of newspaper both sides-ism. This is literally the argument that the US Chamber of Commerce is petitioning the Supreme Court with. The LA Times here is raising your awareness of this, who you mad at?
(DIR) Post #B0J2xhrkhyA9DUKPNg by rv@infosec.exchange
2025-11-16T14:45:43Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tomjennings @ai6yr I didn't misunderstand you. I"m saying the LAT did not frame it that way. It did normal work here, and it's important to know that this is that the premier business lobby in America is trying to argue this before the Supreme Court. Yet your joke is a shot at the messenger, not AmCham
(DIR) Post #B0KMRR2tu0CO1ZOMHw by rv@infosec.exchange
2025-11-17T05:58:40Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tomjennings @ai6yr All good -- I also came at you a little hotter than I could've
(DIR) Post #B0KNCtvYL605D1aXvU by rv@infosec.exchange
2025-11-17T06:07:16Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tomjennings @ai6yr I get it, and don't worry about it. We had a good interaction. IMO venting is good, and if it's off and you get called out, it at least adds clarity and refines focus. we're good