Posts by rukib@sunbeam.city
(DIR) Post #9jGrVE9aSciEfXmD7g by rukib@sunbeam.city
2019-01-29T01:23:32Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Soundbending question:I've tried #Ardour in the past for mixing/recording but it feels clogged and I couldn't really enjoy what I was doing. Felt like fighting the software all the time, I don't know. Maybe it is just me. On the other hand, I've used #Audacity for quick & dirty editing, and it feels great. Simple, clean, it just flows... BUT it does *destructive* editing, so it's no good for bigger projects.The question is: do you recommend any #DAW for linux? Or any software capable of *non-destructive* editing/mixing...Related question: I was thinking #Rosegarden might be worth a try. Have any of you used it?
(DIR) Post #9jGrVEbwlBOi5V2rKK by rukib@sunbeam.city
2019-01-29T18:36:55Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@wraidd I was really looking for something other than Ardour. I'll try Lmms and Rosegarden and do a follow up later
(DIR) Post #9jHMfos9tPJS1e9gmW by rukib@sunbeam.city
2019-05-28T19:41:11Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@byllgrim well, i settled down for a mix of ardour and lmms. I talked a bit about it here: https://sunbeam.city/@rukib/102078000623881607
(DIR) Post #9jHYc4QPKHiMYI9aUK by rukib@sunbeam.city
2019-05-11T14:57:59Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
So, music production on linux. A while ago I talked about using #ardour, #rosegarden and #lmms. This is what I found out:- Ardour is great for big projects and it really comes down to getting used to it. It's powerful and you can do almost anything there, although I still think it slows my flow down. An upside for me is its integration with zynFusion (a new UI for zynaddsubfx).- LMMS is fast and dirty, and I see myself opening it more frequently than ardour, as I can make a quick beat and throw samples everywhere and also use good synth (with classic zynaddsubfx). - Rosegarden have not worked properly so far. Maybe with more patience I could set it up, I don't know, but it seems buggy.I'm also using #MuseScore for musical notation stuff and i love it