Posts by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
(DIR) Post #Ax8N3KunU85oVI69Fg by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
2025-08-13T15:45:28Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
To potentially avoid repeating myself across many single replies here:#codeberg is a great place if you are planning to leave #github following the #GiveUpGitHub movement.If your requirements are more on the side of - private repos- no license enforcements- faster CI/CD with two two options (Crow CI and Forgejo Actions on both amd64 and arm64), then #codefloe might be what you're searching for.https://codefloe.com
(DIR) Post #B0skxGSVjXXS36SKjg by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
2025-12-01T13:12:33Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
RE: https://social.linux.pizza/@pat_dev/115609869879541234Bump! #posit binaries of spatial #rstats packages are still broken as of right now . Seems nobody has reported this to them yet.
(DIR) Post #B0skxHVNqLQlIIo8qu by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
2025-12-03T13:15:56Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Update: a person from #posit saw my post on BlueSky and initiated a rebuild. Still wondering why nobody noticed or reported this earlier. The total duration was ~ 2 weeks, or maybe a bit longer even, depending on when the library update happened. Most likely nobody noticed yet as most people don't update their syslib reguraly (enough). (And yes, I didn't report it on purpose immediately as I was curious to find out what happens as I already reported the last case before that for libgit2 ~ 1.5 years ago)
(DIR) Post #B0skxJ5vvwGGDwuqSe by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
2025-12-03T13:53:44Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@defuneste there are no official binaries built for Fedora I am aware of. Fedora release cycles are too fast compared to RHEl and Ubuntu. Similarly the libs aren't recent enough but also not small enough to be of interest for CI. So it's hard to find an argument building distinct binaries for it. I guess most just build from source. WRT to r2u: I am not a fan of it and don't recommend using it. I think it's the fundamental wrong approach to language binaries.
(DIR) Post #B0skxJhVgEJq6UUr20 by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
2025-12-03T13:55:22Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@defuneste maybe the new manylinux binaries from Posit might do it. They might indeed have their place for niche Linux distros as they bundle the syslibs within their binary so you don't have to link dynamically against the local ones.
(DIR) Post #B0skxLJTgYHf6XGgqm by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
2025-12-03T14:22:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@defuneste Not (yet). I was thinking about it some time ago but then I realized that it might be a too negative one and I should rather focus on positive-minded posts boosting the projects that do things well.And it would probably cause a heated discussion with Dirk (again), which I've had enough of in the past already.
(DIR) Post #B0skxNOVwnV7Yjdjyi by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
2025-12-03T14:34:19Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@defuneste Didn't know about it until now. From a first quick look (2 mins) it looks like a similar approach of building a self-contained library building platform as #nix is doing? Haven't made my opinion on such approaches yet (in detail), so can't say much substantial about it.
(DIR) Post #B1T9Dhfxy8CQ9YQw9w by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
2025-12-20T20:03:31Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@stfn If you want a Woodpecker-with-less-bugs developed on a Forgejo instance, have a look at https://codeberg.org/crowci/crow ;)
(DIR) Post #B5c1bixfB8dGuOuW12 by pat_dev@social.linux.pizza
2026-04-23T21:42:02Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@mmeier @louis there are many ways to somewhat easily provision a RWX these days (nfs subdir prof, longhorn, nfs ganesha, etc.). A nodeSelector, as previously mentioned, might also do the job. FWIW , IMO running a cluster without any RWX option is somewhat shortsighted.