Posts by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
 (DIR) Post #Ato5aZDSv6Uv2yJ6Rs by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       2025-05-06T03:44:02.175459Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Suiseiseki @gyptazy That's not an inherent property of the software. There's no reason why you couldn't use a shared blocklist on a GNU Social or Pleroma instance.
       
 (DIR) Post #AuR6IMLhZXcrh6HRWS by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       2025-05-23T12:04:32.019304Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tomjennings @vyr Most smartphones support bluetooth file transfers
       
 (DIR) Post #AuR9q5DE5mOWFo5X9s by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       2025-05-25T01:02:27.074849Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tomjennings @vyr It does exist - I've used it. There is a "Bluetooth" option to share a file in Android and has been for quite a while (I can confirm that it's present in LineageOS 22.1 and Android 12 on a Google Pixel 3, but I remember using it years ago on older versions of Android from other OEMs too). It uses OBEX and is compatible with bluez-obex's implementation on GNU/Linux (which KDE supports with bluedevil-sendfile, even without KDE Connect).
       
 (DIR) Post #AuRX2MObaq184GtRLs by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       2025-05-25T01:32:17.130254Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tomjennings @vyr It's an option in the file sharing menu, but for some reason it only appears for certain file extensions (you can share arbitrary file types if you rename them to a supported extension).
       
 (DIR) Post #AxCYKQHceiJMCgxqj2 by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       2025-08-15T17:48:23.840689Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Suiseiseki @Codeberg In what way is Anubis proprietary?
       
 (DIR) Post #AxCa1LeZqQpWFcjX7o by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       2025-08-15T18:06:52.691948Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Suiseiseki @Codeberg browsers do not offer an interface that allow for thatThat sounds like an issue with those browsers, and does not make Anubis proprietary. You could make a more user-freedom-respecting browser. If there was a program that automatically downloaded, say, GIMP, and ran it on your computer, would the existence of that program make GIMP proprietary?
       
 (DIR) Post #B0cLWjlh30HVkTK8DA by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       2025-11-25T22:08:54.172231Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mei @domi @SuperDicq I dislike it for a different reason: instead of providing an image with non-free-firmware alongside the free-only image (which was option 6 on the ballot), the free-only image was replaced with the one including non-free-firmware (option 5). This means that if you don’t need the non-free firmware, you still have to waste bandwidth downloading it and remember to boot with firmware=never. There’s also the fact that non-free firmware being available for your system doesn’t necessarily mean you need it (e.g. if you have AR9462 and don’t use bluetooth, you don’t need to load anything), but I don’t remember if Debian asks you whether to load each firmware blob or just loads them all without asking (if it asks it’s not an issue).
       
 (DIR) Post #B118ltm9gGs2g4RA4u by noisytoot@berkeley.edu.pl
       2025-12-07T20:38:57.093658Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xmpp not such a nice view but I did see this XMPP sticker on a lamppost (Cambridge, UK)