Posts by mpjames@glasgow.social
 (DIR) Post #APjEp1roWCzVxEfvF2 by mpjames@glasgow.social
       2022-11-18T12:53:13Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       According to @mastodonusercount Mastodon now has passed 7 million users.
       
 (DIR) Post #APjIsVG06REnn8tt0y by mpjames@glasgow.social
       2022-11-18T13:38:40Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       According to @mastodonusercount Mastodon now has passed 7 million users.
       
 (DIR) Post #AQEGpDz3ejDGGas6SG by mpjames@glasgow.social
       2022-12-03T12:11:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mastodonusercount So, Mastodon passed 8 million known users this morning. If this rate continues, it’ll be over 9 million by Christmas Day, and over 10 million before the end of January.
       
 (DIR) Post #AQer9UpdNDPslsO50i by mpjames@glasgow.social
       2022-12-16T08:00:57Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mastodonusercount Amazing to think I saw this post a mere 12 hours ago, and thought: “Yep, the amount of new users is definitely showing down over the Christmas period!”
       
 (DIR) Post #ARH7wH4EJyANuAOimG by mpjames@glasgow.social
       2023-01-03T19:06:40Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mastodonusercount Judging by the past few hours, Mastodon will hit 9 million users in the next hour or two.
       
 (DIR) Post #ARbxgkbULacYd3JmXA by mpjames@glasgow.social
       2023-01-13T20:22:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mastodonusercount On this basis, looks like the user count will hit 10 million in around 68 days. (Wonder if Medium starting up their own Masto instance might accelerate this?)
       
 (DIR) Post #ASqd7pH94ohqDEX9PM by mpjames@glasgow.social
       2023-02-19T20:04:50Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @mastodonusercount So, possibly 9.6M users on next report.
       
 (DIR) Post #AWMIWSA8HJrvcYfM7U by mpjames@glasgow.social
       2023-06-04T17:56:14Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @joelle Where are people writing these articles coming from? Until the mainstream started openly including queer people (Often for self serving purposes.), the mainstream regarded pretty much all of Pride as “radical” at the time. Who do the people writing these articles think these non-“radical” people were? How were they not “radical”? And how were they not labelled “radical” at the time?