Posts by mirdaki@fosstodon.org
(DIR) Post #1029923 by mirdaki@fosstodon.org
2018-11-07T03:13:58Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Well #introduction time,Hello everyone! I'm a soon to be graduating Computer Engineering student. I started an #OpenSource club at my school, which I'm still very involved with. Love #StarWars, #photography, and (most) things #geeky.Feel free to come by and chat!#introductions #HelloWorld
(DIR) Post #1153170 by mirdaki@fosstodon.org
2018-11-12T19:07:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@boingbot 😢
(DIR) Post #AbXGRtfIutMRnv8gMK by mirdaki@fosstodon.org
2023-11-06T16:38:43Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@matrix I think the Matrix team has done a lot of things right over the years, and think this change should be met with that in mind. I do have a few questions:1. My reading of the CLA is it's necessary for Element to offer proprietary versions of the software or integration with proprietary changes that would normally violate AGPLv3. Is that correct?
(DIR) Post #AbXGijkj1a1Xz3hkki by mirdaki@fosstodon.org
2023-11-06T16:39:32Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@matrix 2. I understand Element is the primary driver of Matrix work and they should be have a sustainable path forward. And that the Foundation isn't funded enough to do development on it's own. I do worry moving the projects back under Element is a bad look for the ecosystem, since it heavily favors Element. Could you describe any circumstances (such as more foundation funding or active contributions for other entities) that would prompt moving the projects back under the foundation?
(DIR) Post #AbXGxlWmhsePpiLmPw by mirdaki@fosstodon.org
2023-11-06T16:39:39Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@matrix 3. Is some of the motivation related to my first question (again, assuming I understand that correctly) the reason for moving the projects back under Element? If the projects were back under the Foundation's umbrella, could those needs also be satisfied somehow?
(DIR) Post #AbaCoullA2FpXwl5yS by mirdaki@fosstodon.org
2023-11-08T02:43:38Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@element @matrix Thank you both for responding to my and others questions. I understand being transparent can be challenging when controversial decisions are public, and appreciate the continued communication