Posts by ianinferno@mastodon.social
(DIR) Post #AXn71qY23JNN9dBaPg by ianinferno@mastodon.social
2023-07-17T16:41:39Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@lowqualityfacts high quality facts
(DIR) Post #AXzZi2QsJlZct9tj9c by ianinferno@mastodon.social
2023-07-23T16:59:24Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@lowqualityfacts it's important to regularly see your #mastodontist to maintain good tusk #health and #alignment
(DIR) Post #Ajl1Xw4CJxowLpxUUC by ianinferno@mastodon.social
2024-07-09T14:56:02Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom anarchy is incompatible with the "overthrow" of the state. That just results in another state. The state must dissolve. They invariably do. In the meantime, anarchy exists at the interstices in the form of autonomous zones and direct action. Those activities answer the question "how can we survive without a state?" Which is similar to the question "how can we survive without a king."
(DIR) Post #Ajl5nMOR7cCMA52GTw by ianinferno@mastodon.social
2024-07-09T15:43:37Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom When I say dissolve, I mean states fail and are replaced. Capitalist states may result from successive dissolutions, but this is not a constant any more than kings succeeding kings was a constant.The fundamental difficulty with this survey: anarchy is not communism. In practice, communism replaces one ruling party with another. Anarchism proposes no ruling party.
(DIR) Post #Ajl6VKalBDnVJhlb9c by ianinferno@mastodon.social
2024-07-09T15:51:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Radical_EgoCom In some other threads you mention logic and proof. We can state, by definition, that anarchism implies no state, and therefore overthrowing one government and installing another is not anarchy.When we discuss history we have left the realms of deduction and induction. That's fine, but let's not pretend rigor.So far, we have no evidence of overthrow resulting in anarchy. That doesn't make it impossible, but history suggests overthrow results in a new state and a new elite.