Posts by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
 (DIR) Post #AYmeFpTBxklpRJkC0m by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
       2023-08-16T09:11:09Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @dada Remote : startup nationDistanciel : RH, ComExHome Office : inconnu vendant des conseils moisis d'indépendance financière sur YouTubeTélétravail : le reste du monde
       
 (DIR) Post #AZBrCoFsBAfV9vP28W by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
       2023-08-28T10:55:43Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @riotnrrd @tante The FLOSS community set a precise definition for what free software is.Now, some projects want to essentially control software usage and profit by predatory cloud actors (fair enough), but they don't want to face the bad press of being banded as proprietary (which they became).So they try to spin it as free-ish, source available, or "open-source in spirit", to keep a positive spin from just closing their previously open codebase.The problem is not with the FLOSS community.
       
 (DIR) Post #AZBrCq2TXx8kgx9MX2 by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
       2023-08-28T11:11:09Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @riotnrrd @tanteAgain, I don't disagree with adding the usage restriction clause. But if this clause restricts usage of the software, it breaks one the core freedoms. In this case, the project just stops referring itself as free software anymore, and everyone moves on.This is totally fine.Spinning it as still free "in spirit" is just a smoke screen for becoming proprietary. That's a waste of time and energy, and a lack of respect to the project's contributors who did not agree to this.
       
 (DIR) Post #AZBrCrfrT0EtlOaKYq by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
       2023-08-28T13:01:41Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @riotnrrd @tante It's an interesting thought, but I fail to see how this can be defined as a freedom without being contradictory to "The freedom to use the program for *any* purpose" (freedom 0, emphasis is mine).
       
 (DIR) Post #AZBsAFTQcm4ef55ON6 by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
       2023-08-28T13:14:50Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante @riotnrrd What are you proposing?
       
 (DIR) Post #AZmkLT4CEuY0XB96VU by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
       2023-09-15T08:11:40Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer L'auteur qui admet derrière "j'adore fait du pipeau" 👌
       
 (DIR) Post #AZtqBQwumGA24mj0pE by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
       2023-09-15T06:17:14Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kfogel Omnivim 2 used to be licensed with a time-delay open-source license.They eventually switched back to MIT. The corresponding GitHub issue mentions lowering the barrier for contributions and easiness for packaging downstream (like the AUR) as motivation points.
       
 (DIR) Post #AohVPsA89jA6mZJmk4 by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
       2024-12-04T11:32:19Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer"JSR isn't a replacement for the npm registry; it's a superset of npm."
       
 (DIR) Post #AuTkgNInKXg6BMVQXI by ghisvail@framapiaf.org
       2025-05-26T07:30:03Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bortzmeyer @sarah_trichet_allaire Les conteneurs solutionnent le problème du partage "universelle", mais pas de la reproductibilité logicielle au sens large.Pour vous en convaincre, prenez une recette Docker et construisez la même image à 1 an d'intervalle : la simple présence d'une directive " FROM ubuntu:latest" rendra les deux environnements différents.