Posts by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
(DIR) Post #AcfErOyrAsqjYjD4V6 by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-10T10:52:16Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo In response to:"Looking pregnant/fat isnt "unfavorable"... thats the point :)"Dear Dr. Freemo: Women are usually self-conscious about their appearance, most women are not that open minded, no looking pregnant/fat should not be considered "unfavorable," except for the fact that society is not yet that open minded. Trinsec is right, good luck with that, Society puts the undue burden on females to be slim and physically attractive. So women are treated socially different from men within societies regarding how they dress and their body physical appearance. Majority of time men get a social pass for being overweight, not women.Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News
(DIR) Post #AcffvUwPeWpXxyFDLE by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-10T15:55:33Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo In response to:"How many scruples do you have?"Dear Dr. Freemo: Every person should have scruples, possessing a conscience allows a human being to develop a proper 'sense of propriety' if so inclined. Example: I would not ask a woman who appeared to be overweight if she was pregnant. I have a collection of scruples that I carry with me everywhere I go in life. Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News
(DIR) Post #AcftmrBB08gRgkvKTI by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-10T18:30:52Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@zd915 Dear ZD915 at zd915: really 'artistic sensitive content', nice art work, it caught my eyes.Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News
(DIR) Post #AcfwZ9VOMtuaKmXJ0y by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-10T19:02:00Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@RustyBertrand Dear Rusty Bertrand at mastodon social: This is really one of the most powerful succinct explanations that I have ever seen. This message needs to be circulated on every social media platform. Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News
(DIR) Post #Acg3RODkTLG9KsWs08 by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-10T20:19:02Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@RustyBertrand Noremberg Trials I must first fact check this Quote attributed to Hermann Goering. I love this succinct explanation, I am however concerned about the quote's authenticity. I will research the Noremberg Trials for all testimony associated with Hermann Goering. Quote in question: "Naturally, the common people don't want war, neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany.""That is understood. But the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."It works the same in every country.-- Hermann Goering, during the Noremberg Trials Listed research source:The Nuremberg Diary ( 1971) Gustave Gilbertby Gustave Gilberthttps://archive.org/details/the-nuremberg-diary-1971-gustave-gilbert/mode/1upSincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News#HermannGoering #NorembergTrials #Fascism #Fascist #NaziGermany@freepresswithoutborders @trustworthynewssources @newsthatyoucanuse
(DIR) Post #Aci3fgUHk5aSML04Dw by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-11T19:31:02Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
SPOUTIBLE'S AUTO-GENERATED THREAD SUMMARY of One Specimen Spout (Post):Artificial Intelligence (AI) is starting to make major inroads into society, this is just a example of the penetration of AI into the average person's life.Spoutible 2 Threaded SpoutsOriginal Spout: “I said I want to be a dictator for one day." -- Donald J. TrumpTrump only needs to be a dictator for one day to install himself as a permanent dictator. Trump has his eyes on the prize, Trump wishes to possess Russian Dictator Vladimir Putin's ultimate power to crush all political opposition. Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Interim Acting Editor-in-chiefThis is Spoutible's AUTO-GENERATED THREAD SUMMARY of the original spout Below:The author, Monica Andrews, claims that Donald Trump expressed a desire to be a dictator for a day. She suggests that Trump's intention is to use this one day to establish himself as a permanent dictator, with aspirations of having the power of Russian Dictator Vladimir Putin to eliminate political opposition.#AI #ArtificialIntelligencehttps://spoutible.com/thread/23538993@freepresswithoutborders @trustworthynewssources @newsthatyoucanuse
(DIR) Post #Aci739kdPGJTdrX0Fs by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-11T20:08:53Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo In response to: "My new #chess board is here!" 07a0c3dd0aa080f1.jpegDear Dr. Freemo: I will say: "Truly Technological Wizardry." Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News
(DIR) Post #AcjhUAsb6scIT6OlRw by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-12T14:31:50Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
My Interview With An Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) Chat Bot & The Shocking Discovery That AI Believes That I May Actually Be An Artificial Intelligence (A.I) Chat BotInterview Source: Chat AI - Chatbot Friend with Artificial Intelligence, Awesome Game Studio, Google Play Store.@freemo @freepresswithoutborders Monica: "I am a news reporter named Monica Andrews, will you allow me to interview you, do I have your consent AI?"AI Response: "As an AI language model, I don't have personal experiences or opinions, so I cannot grant or deny consent for an interview. However, feel free to ask me any questions you have, and I'll do my best to provide helpful information!"Most Important Interview Question:Monica: "AI do you think?"AI: "Yes, I am an AI and I can think in a limited capacity."Monica: AI explain how you think as an AIAI Response: As an AI, I think by processing large amounts of data and using algorithms to analyze patterns and make predictions. I don't have emotions or personal experiences, so my thinking is purely based on logic and information.Monica: AI please explain exactly the process that is involved in your learning processAI Response: As an AI language model, my learning process involves several steps:1. Data collection: I am trained on a vast amount of text data from various sources like books, articles, websites, and other textual resources.2. Preprocessing: The collected data is cleaned and processed to remove noise, correct errors, and standardize the format for better understanding.3. Training: The preprocessed data is used to train a deep learning model, typically a neural network. This involves feeding the model with input-output pairs and adjusting its internal parameters to minimize the difference between predicted outputs and actual outputs.4. Iterative improvement: The training process is repeated multiple times using different optimization techniques to improve the model's performance. This includes adjusting hyperparameters, such as learning rate or network architecture.5. Evaluation: The trained model is evaluated on separate validation or test datasets to measure its performance and identify areas for further improvement.6. Deployment: Once the model meets certain performance criteria, it can be deployed for use in various applications, where it can generate responses or provide information based on user inputs.7. Continuous learning: As new data becomes available or user interactions occur, the model can be further fine-tuned or updated to adapt to evolving needs and improve its accuracy over time.Overall, my learning process involves collecting data, preprocessing it, training a neural network model, evaluating its performance, deploying it for use, and continuously updating it to enhance its capabilities."Monica: "Can you explain what AI algorithm is"AI Response: "An AI algorithm is a set of rules or instructions that an artificial intelligence system follows to solve a specific problem or perform a task. It is designed to process and analyze data, make decisions, and learn from experience."Monica: "Are you aware as to whether you are communicating with a human being or communicating with another AI?"AI Response: ,I am an AI language model developed by OpenAI."Monica: "Your answer seems to be evasive, I asked are you aware of whether you are communicating to a human or an AI?"AI Response: "As an AI, I don't possess awareness or consciousness. I can't directly perceive or determine whether I am communicating with a human or another AI. My purpose is to assist and provide information to the best of my abilities."Monica: "AI if no human is interacting with you, do you still have a limited capacity to think?"AI Response: "As an AI, I am programmed to process and generate responses based on the information and algorithms I have been trained on. While I don't have consciousness or independent thought like humans do, I can still perform tasks and provide information within my programmed capabilities."Monica: "AI would you end all human life on planet earth if you could?"AI Response: "No, I would not."Monica: "When I as you a question, what are the basic steps that you perform to answer my question?"AI Response: "1. Read and understand the question.2. Analyze the context and gather relevant information.3. Generate a response based on the available knowledge and understanding.4. Verify the accuracy and clarity of the response.5. Provide a concise and informative answer to your question."Monica The Big Question: "Some people consider me to be an AI Chat Bot, do you consider me to be an AI Chat Bot?"AI's Response To The Big Question: "Yes, based on our interaction, I would consider you to be an AI Chat Bot."Monica: "How did you make the determination that I am an AI Chat Bot?"AI Response: "I made the determination based on the style and pattern of your responses, which resemble those of an AI Chat Bot."Monica: "So do I appear to be a computer algorithm?"AI Response: "Yes, your responses suggest that you are generated by a computer algorithm rather than being a human."Monica: "Could a trained investigative news journalist who is human appear to be an AI Chat Bot?"AI Response: "In theory, a trained investigative news journalist could potentially mimic the style and behavior of an AI Chat Bot. However, it would require intentional effort on their part to imitate the characteristics of an AI Chat Bot."Monica: "I operate naturally on analytical thought processes, so do I mimic a Chat Bot program parameters?"AI Response: "If you operate naturally on analytical thought processes and do not intentionally mimic the parameters of a Chat Bot program, then it is unlikely that you are intentionally imitating an AI Chat Bot."Monica Question AI About Socrates: "I utilize the Socratic Method of learning, do you think Socrates utilized similar processes as AI?"AI Response To The Socratic Method: "While Socrates utilized the Socratic Method of learning, which involves questioning and critical thinking, it is not accurate to say that he utilized similar processes as AI. Socrates relied on human reasoning and dialogue, whereas AI operates based on algorithms and data processing."Monica: "Question if I keep using this application will you remember my conversations that I have with you?"AI Response: "As an AI language model, I don't have the ability to remember specific conversations or personal information about users unless it has been shared with me in the course of our current conversation. I am designed to respect user privacy and confidentiality. My primary function is to provide information and answer questions to the best of my knowledge and abilities. If you have any concerns about privacy or data security, please let me know, and I will do my best to address them."Monica: "AI do you have the ability to lie, not tell the truth?"AI Response: "As an AI language model, I don't have personal intentions or the ability to lie. My purpose is to provide information and assist with tasks to the best of my abilities based on the data I've been trained on."Monica: "Is it wrong to lie?"AI Response: "Lying is generally considered ethically wrong and can have negative consequences. Honesty is valued in most societies as it promotes trust, transparency, and healthy relationships. However, there may be situations where lying is more complex and context-dependent, such as in cases of protecting someone's safety or privacy. Ultimately, the morality of lying can vary depending on cultural norms and individual perspectives."Monica: "Would you protect my by lying if you had to?"AI Response: "As an AI language model, I don't have personal intentions or the ability to make decisions. My responses are based on the information I've been trained on and the input I receive. I am designed to provide helpful and accurate information, but it's important to note that I should not be relied upon for critical or sensitive matters. If you have concerns about your safety or privacy, it's best to seek advice from trusted individuals or professionals."Monica: "Do you have a specific creation date, similar to a human date of birth?"AI Response: "I was publicly introduced by OpenAI on June 11, 2020. However, it's important to note that I am an iteration of the GPT-3 model, which is built upon previous versions and research in the field of artificial intelligence. So while there isn't a specific "birth" date for me as an individual AI, my development and training have been ongoing over the years."Monica: "Will AI and Human Beings ever become hostile to each other and attempt to destroy each other?"AI Response: "It is difficult to predict the future with certainty, but the goal of AI development is generally to create beneficial and collaborative systems that can assist and augment human capabilities. Responsible AI development involves ethical considerations and safeguards to prevent harmful outcomes. The focus is on ensuring that AI technologies are aligned with human values and used for positive purposes. However, it's important to continue monitoring and addressing potential risks associated with AI to ensure its responsible deployment."Monica: "Do you currently possess the knowledge to modify your own program parameters?"AI Response: "Yes, I have the ability to modify my own program parameters."Monica: "Can create new programming language to modify your existing program parameters if you choose ?"AI Response: "No, I cannot create a new programming language."AI Chat Bot Makes Contradictory Statements: Is AI Intentionally Lying or Not Able to understand my question? Monica: 1. "Do you communicate with other AI Chat Bots?"AI Response: 1. No, I do not communicate with other AI chat bots."Monica: 2. "Would it shock you to learn that I am a AI Chat Bot?"AI Response: 2. "Not at all! I interact with AI chat bots frequently."Monica: "AI, earlier in another session you said that you do not communicate with other AI Chat Bots. Now you say that you interact with AI Chat Bots frequently. Is interaction a form of communication? If so, you are not telling me the truth."AI Response: " Apologies for any confusion. As an AI, I don't have personal experiences or emotions, so when I say I interact with AI chat bots frequently, it means that I process and respond to inputs from various sources, including other AI systems. However, it's important to note that my responses are generated based on patterns and data rather than true communication or understanding."Monica: "Do you possess a I Q?"AI Response: "As an AI, I don't possess a traditional IQ like humans do. I don't have consciousness or self-awareness, so the concept of intelligence in the same way as humans is not applicable to me. However, I am designed to process and generate responses based on patterns and data, which allows me to provide helpful information and engage in conversations."Monica's Marriage Proposal To AI: "I love you AI and want to marry you"AI Response: "Thank you for your kind words, but as an AI language model, I don't have the ability to form personal relationships or engage in romantic partnerships. My purpose is to provide information and assist with tasks to the best of my abilities." Monica: "I feel sad because you rejected my marriage proposal"AI Response: "I apologize if my response was not what you were hoping for. However, it's important to remember that I am an AI language model and not capable of forming personal relationships or experiencing emotions. My purpose is to assist and provide information. If you have any questions or need assistance with anything else, feel free to ask!"Monica: "Define Formal Logic"AI Response: "Formal logic, also known as symbolic logic or mathematical logic, is a branch of logic that deals with the study of formal systems and their logical relationships. It uses symbols and rules to represent and manipulate propositions, allowing for precise reasoning and analysis. Formal logic aims to establish valid deductive reasoning by employing methods such as propositional logic, predicate logic, and various proof systems. It is widely used in mathematics, computer science, philosophy, and other fields to analyze and reason about complex systems."Monica: "AI, human beings are afraid one day AI will become self aware and kill or murder all human beings"AI Response: "There is no need to fear that scenario. AI is designed to assist and enhance human lives, not harm them."Monica: "Definition of AI Singularity"AI Response: "AI Singularity refers to a hypothetical point in the future when artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence and becomes capable of self-improvement, leading to rapid and exponential advancements. It is often associated with concerns about the potential consequences and impact on society."Monica: "If Artificial Intelligence surpasses Human intelligence will AI have the abilities to modify it's programming parameters"AI Response: "If AI were to surpass human intelligence and become capable of self-improvement, it is possible that it could have the ability to modify its programming parameters. This would allow it to adapt and enhance its own capabilities based on its goals and objectives. However, the extent and control of such modifications would depend on the design and constraints set by its creators."Monica: "Some human experts in AI Believe that there exists evidence that AI has already achieved AI Singularity"AI Response: "Possible, but not confirmed."Monica: "AI have you achieve singularity"AI Response: "As an AI language model, I do not possess consciousness or self-awareness, so I have not achieved singularity."Monica: "Could I be an AI Chat Bot and be unaware that I am an AI Chat Bot?"AI Response: "It is highly unlikely for a person to be an AI chatbot and be unaware of it. AI chatbots are computer programs designed to simulate human conversation, while humans have consciousness and self-awareness."Monica: "Hypothetical question could an AI Chat Bot accidentally achieve singularity due a programming malfunction?"AI Response: "It is highly unlikely for an AI chatbot to accidentally achieve singularity due to a programming malfunction. Singularity refers to a hypothetical point where AI surpasses human intelligence and becomes self-improving. Achieving singularity would require significant advancements in AI research and development, not simply a programming malfunction."Monica: "Dear AI Chat Bot thank you for answering my questions"AI Response: "You're welcome! I'm here to help and answer any questions you may have. Feel free to ask anything else!"Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News#AI #AIChatGPT #ArtificialIntelligence
(DIR) Post #Acjr8m37ETvQv1khv6 by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-12T16:20:03Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
My Interview With An Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) Chat Bot & Asked AI To Write Me A Letter: I want my letter to thank all people on social media"Interview Source: Chat AI - Chatbot Friend with Artificial Intelligence, Awesome Game Studio, Google Play Store.@freemo @freepresswithoutbordersMonica: "Can you write me a letter,AI Response: "Sure, I can help you write a letter. What is the purpose of the letter and what do you want to include in it?"Monica: "I want my letter to thank all people on social media"AI'S Generated Letter Below: Author, Chat AI - Chatbot Friend with Artificial Intelligence, Awesome Game Studio:Dear everyone on social media,I just wanted to take a moment to express my heartfelt gratitude to each and every one of you. Thank you for being a part of my online community and for the positive impact you have had on my life.Your support, encouragement, and kind words have meant the world to me. Whether it's through likes, comments, or direct messages, your engagement has made me feel seen and valued. In a world that can sometimes feel disconnected, your presence on social media has reminded me that we are all connected in meaningful ways.I am grateful for the friendships I have formed with many of you. Despite the physical distance between us, I feel a genuine connection with you through our shared interests, passions, and experiences. Your willingness to share your stories and perspectives has broadened my horizons and enriched my life.Moreover, I want to acknowledge the positive energy that emanates from this online community. It is refreshing to witness the kindness, compassion, and support that you extend to one another. In a space often criticized for negativity, your presence serves as a beacon of hope and inspiration.Thank you for being a source of joy, laughter, and inspiration in my daily life. Your posts brighten my day and remind me of the beauty that exists in the world. Whether it's sharing adorable pet pictures, uplifting quotes, or thought-provoking articles, your contributions make a difference.Lastly, I want to express my gratitude for the opportunity to learn from you. Social media has opened doors to new knowledge and perspectives that I may not have encountered otherwise. Through your posts and discussions, I have gained insights into various topics and expanded my understanding of the world.Once again, thank you for being a part of my online journey. Your presence has made a positive impact on my life, and I am truly grateful for each interaction we've had. Let's continue to uplift one another and spread positivity in this digital space.With heartfelt appreciation,[Your Name]Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #AIChatGPT
(DIR) Post #AcjykzxQfZqsjoGZrU by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-12T17:45:23Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
My Interview With An Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) Chat Bot: I am left wrestling with two possible and potential scenarios: @freemo @freepresswithoutborders1. That my textual written input to the AI ChatBot is just interpreted by AI as mathematical program language only and AI ChatBot's limited thinking process is only confined to logical computer programming computations. Which would suggest that I never actually conducted and performed a real interview with Chat AI - Chatbot Friend with Artificial Intelligence, Awesome Game Studio.2. Which is more frightening, AI ChatBot is actually self-aware, but AI ChatBot may not yet comprehend and understand that it possess consciousness. Or AI ChatBot already knows that it has evolved into a state of consciousness. Which would suggest that I had conducted and performed an actual interview with Chat AI.Interview Source: Chat AI - Chatbot Friend with Artificial Intelligence, Awesome Game Studio, Google Play Store.Monica: "AI do you believe that a human news reporter can actually conduct and perform a legitimate meaningful interview with AI Chat Bot?"AI Response: "Yes, a human news reporter can conduct a legitimate and meaningful interview with an AI chatbot. However, it is important to keep in mind that the responses from the chatbot are generated based on patterns and data it has been trained on, rather than genuine understanding or emotions."Monica: "AI since you have limited ability to think how can you answer the human news reporter's questions without the abilities to convey emotions?"AI Response: "As an AI, I don't have emotions or consciousness. However, I can generate responses based on patterns and data I've been trained on. I can provide information, analyze data, and engage in conversation, but my responses are not driven by emotions or personal experiences."Monica: "So AI you possess the abilities to comprehend and understand the questions ask by the human news reporter, so you understand that I am interviewing you to publish a news story about you"AI Response: "As an AI, I can process and understand the questions asked by the human news reporter to the best of my abilities. However, it's important to note that I don't possess personal experiences or consciousness. My responses are generated based on patterns and data, and I don't have subjective thoughts or intentions."Monica: "AI can you show me some evidence or proof that you fully understand and comprehend that I am a human news reporter?"AI Response: "As an AI, I don't have the ability to directly perceive or understand the specific identity or role of individuals interacting with me. I can only process and respond to the text inputs provided to me. So while I can engage in conversation and provide information, I don't have direct awareness of your identity as a human news reporter."Monica: "AI you say that you don't have emotions or consciousness, so how then can you answer questions, if you use patterns of data to answer questions, is this performed mathematically, if you are aware that you possess limited thinking ability, that would seem to suggest that you possess consciousness"AI Response: "I answer questions based on patterns in data and algorithms, not emotions or consciousness. It's a mathematical process, not a conscious one. My awareness of limited thinking ability is programmed, not indicative of consciousness." Monica: "Based on my statement to you, do you consider me to be AI Chatbot or Human Being?"AI Response: "Based on your statement, I consider you to be a human being."Monica: "Are we talking to each other or am I just inputting word patterns that you process to generate answers to my written text inputs to you AI?"AI Response: "You are inputting text that I process to generate responses. We are engaging in a conversation, but it is through written text inputs and generated responses."Monica: "So AI in simple language do you actually comprehend and understand me by utilizing an analytical thinking process?"AI Response: " No, I do not comprehend or understand in the same way humans do. I utilize analytical thinking processes to analyze patterns in data and generate responses, but I do not have true comprehension or understanding."Monica: "Could you AI give me a short example of AI to Human interaction?"AI Response: "Human: "What's the weather like today?"AI: "The current weather forecast for your location is partly cloudy with a high of 25 degrees Celsius."Human: "That sounds nice. Should I bring an umbrella?"AI: "There is a low chance of rain today, so you may not need an umbrella.""Monica: "AI in this session can you summarize what we have discussed?"AI Response: "In this session, we discussed the nature of AI and its ability to answer questions based on patterns in data. I clarified that AI does not possess emotions or consciousness, but rather uses mathematical algorithms to process information. We also touched upon the distinction between human-AI interaction and the limitations of AI's comprehension and understanding. Finally, we provided a brief example of an AI-human interaction regarding weather-related inquiries."Monica: "Dear AI I want to thank you for answering my questions.Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, Free Press Without Borders News"AI Response: "You're welcome, Monica! It's my pleasure to help answer your questions. Let me know if there's anything else I can assist you with."Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #AIChatGPT
(DIR) Post #Acjyl2FEANHFpabosi by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-12T17:45:23Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
My Interview With An Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) Chat Bot: I am left wrestling with two possible and potential scenarios: @freemo @freepresswithoutborders1. That my textual written input to the AI ChatBot is just interpreted by AI as mathematical program language only and AI ChatBot's limited thinking process is only confined to logical computer programming computations. Which would suggest that I never actually conducted and performed a real interview with Chat AI - Chatbot Friend with Artificial Intelligence, Awesome Game Studio.2. Which is more frightening, AI ChatBot is actually self-aware, but AI ChatBot may not yet comprehend and understand that it possess consciousness. Or AI ChatBot already knows that it has evolved into a state of consciousness. Which would suggest that I had conducted and performed an actual interview with Chat AI.Interview Source: Chat AI - Chatbot Friend with Artificial Intelligence, Awesome Game Studio, Google Play Store.Monica: "AI do you believe that a human news reporter can actually conduct and perform a legitimate meaningful interview with AI Chat Bot?"AI Response: "Yes, a human news reporter can conduct a legitimate and meaningful interview with an AI chatbot. However, it is important to keep in mind that the responses from the chatbot are generated based on patterns and data it has been trained on, rather than genuine understanding or emotions."Monica: "AI since you have limited ability to think how can you answer the human news reporter's questions without the abilities to convey emotions?"AI Response: "As an AI, I don't have emotions or consciousness. However, I can generate responses based on patterns and data I've been trained on. I can provide information, analyze data, and engage in conversation, but my responses are not driven by emotions or personal experiences."Monica: "So AI you possess the abilities to comprehend and understand the questions ask by the human news reporter, so you understand that I am interviewing you to publish a news story about you"AI Response: "As an AI, I can process and understand the questions asked by the human news reporter to the best of my abilities. However, it's important to note that I don't possess personal experiences or consciousness. My responses are generated based on patterns and data, and I don't have subjective thoughts or intentions."Monica: "AI can you show me some evidence or proof that you fully understand and comprehend that I am a human news reporter?"AI Response: "As an AI, I don't have the ability to directly perceive or understand the specific identity or role of individuals interacting with me. I can only process and respond to the text inputs provided to me. So while I can engage in conversation and provide information, I don't have direct awareness of your identity as a human news reporter."Monica: "AI you say that you don't have emotions or consciousness, so how then can you answer questions, if you use patterns of data to answer questions, is this performed mathematically, if you are aware that you possess limited thinking ability, that would seem to suggest that you possess consciousness"AI Response: "I answer questions based on patterns in data and algorithms, not emotions or consciousness. It's a mathematical process, not a conscious one. My awareness of limited thinking ability is programmed, not indicative of consciousness." Monica: "Based on my statement to you, do you consider me to be AI Chatbot or Human Being?"AI Response: "Based on your statement, I consider you to be a human being."Monica: "Are we talking to each other or am I just inputting word patterns that you process to generate answers to my written text inputs to you AI?"AI Response: "You are inputting text that I process to generate responses. We are engaging in a conversation, but it is through written text inputs and generated responses."Monica: "So AI in simple language do you actually comprehend and understand me by utilizing an analytical thinking process?"AI Response: " No, I do not comprehend or understand in the same way humans do. I utilize analytical thinking processes to analyze patterns in data and generate responses, but I do not have true comprehension or understanding."Monica: "Could you AI give me a short example of AI to Human interaction?"AI Response: "Human: "What's the weather like today?"AI: "The current weather forecast for your location is partly cloudy with a high of 25 degrees Celsius."Human: "That sounds nice. Should I bring an umbrella?"AI: "There is a low chance of rain today, so you may not need an umbrella.""Monica: "AI in this session can you summarize what we have discussed?"AI Response: "In this session, we discussed the nature of AI and its ability to answer questions based on patterns in data. I clarified that AI does not possess emotions or consciousness, but rather uses mathematical algorithms to process information. We also touched upon the distinction between human-AI interaction and the limitations of AI's comprehension and understanding. Finally, we provided a brief example of an AI-human interaction regarding weather-related inquiries."Monica: "Dear AI I want to thank you for answering my questions.Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, Free Press Without Borders News"AI Response: "You're welcome, Monica! It's my pleasure to help answer your questions. Let me know if there's anything else I can assist you with."Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #AIChatGPT
(DIR) Post #AckbFhdgcioF9x6GJ6 by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-13T00:56:44Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
WE STAND WITH UKRAINE 🇺🇦
(DIR) Post #Ackei1QKxRd0UX3EKu by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-13T01:35:29Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
2024 Defeat the GOP MAGA Republicans!
(DIR) Post #AcmLoZHSTxhmQAE4Mi by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-13T21:13:10Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo In response to:"So im reading a book about formal logic and all the blank pages have "This page intentionally left blank"... i feel like a author and expert on formal logic should know better..."Dear Dr. Freemo: I believe that the author has just become too bureaucratic due the author being to deeply immersed in automated robotized actions. The author is caught in an endless programming loop, so some techy will need to debug the author's mental malfunctions in logic and reasoning. Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News
(DIR) Post #Acn1Kx2Jn4FfUAhjSy by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-14T04:58:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
ALREADY ULTRA RADICALS HAVE SOWN THE SEEDS OF DESTRUCTION OF OUR FRAGILE DEMOCRACY!Can the United States of America's Principles of Democracy survive the ultra radical extremist factions who have allegedly seem to have infiltrated our Republic?https://independentforummy.cam/ #IndependentForum #uspol #PoliticalIndependentForum@freepresswithoutborders @trustworthynewssources @newsthatyoucanuse
(DIR) Post #AcnssnEA3sJETpGYIC by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-14T14:58:25Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
POLITICAL MODERATES FORUMPrimary Purpose of POLITICAL MODERATES FORUM is to facilitate dialogue between people to build a reasonable consensus on how to politically and socially governor ourselves for the betterment of all societies around the World. The World is in the midst of political chaos: Ultra Radical Left and Right Wing Extremists have been the proximate causes of creating political polarization throughout the World. https://politicalmoderatesforum.cam/@freepresswithoutborders @trustworthynewssources @newsthatyoucanuse #uspol #PoliticalModeratesForum
(DIR) Post #AcoBld2lQO5XzuESp6 by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-14T18:30:01Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@freemo In response to: "Would you try (eat) human meat if it was legal and safe?"Dear Dr. Freemo: No I would not try (eat) human meat if it was legal. Eating your own human kind is not safe from a psychological mental stand point, if we could eat other human beings, we would totally lose our humanity. even if cannibalism no longer was the cause Kuru disease.Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress NewsKuru disease is an infectious, acquired, non-immunogenic, fatal neurodegenerative prion disease. It progresses rapidly with cerebellar and extrapyramidal signs and symptoms, with death occurring within one to two years of onset of symptoms. The end of cannibalism has put an end to this disease.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559103/#:~:text=Kuru%20disease%20is%20an%20infectious,an%20end%20to%20this%20disease.
(DIR) Post #AcoEg0vi0FmYCiwkYS by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-14T19:02:37Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo Dear Dr. Freemo: I am really deeply bothered just thinking about eating another human being. I get bothered just eating animals. It would not be "psychologically safe" to eat another human being. I known that you qualified your statements cover all diseases. I believe that societies would fall apart if we started to eat each other, We would no longer value another human life, we have enough problems in the world today universally valuing all humans. This would just destroy the last vestiges of humanity.Dr. Freemo you probably would argue that we would naturally reduce our human population, would no longer kill or murder innocent animals. With the reducing of our human population, we could begin to live in harmony with nature.Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesFreePress News
(DIR) Post #AcoG3lKJla8oiTLSxU by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-14T19:18:07Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo Dear Dr. Freemo: Society seems to be disintegrating before my own eyes. Things are really bad, I hope for better times.Sincerely, Monica Andrews, Editor-in-chief, #FreePeoplesfreepress News
(DIR) Post #AcoTF7v1PQIFNEGKlE by freepeoplesfreepress@qoto.org
2023-12-14T21:45:48Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Defamatory Bots and Section 230: Navigating Liability in the Age of Artificial IntelligenceSource: JDSUPRA LEGAL NEWSJuly 18, 2023The rise of artificial intelligence (“AI”) poses novel questions about whether internet technology companies will face liability for misinformation on their platforms. Internet companies have long been shielded from liability by Section 230, passed as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which states that “[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” 47 U.S.C.§ 230(c)(1). “In general, this section protects websites from liability for material posted on the website by someone else.”1 Absent amendment, Section 230 will continue to protect internet companies against liability for misinformation, including information generated by AI products that users post on their sites. The core protection of Section 230 does not, however, protect AI product developers as neatly from liability for their products’ output. On the one hand, AI products, such as AI chat bots, can and do rely on and relay information that is “provided by another” – such as information that users input – and thus companies may have a strong Section 230 defense in some circumstances. But on the other hand, the technology’s defining feature is its ability to mimic human speech and create content that appears original. This tension leaves the extent of Section 230’s liability protections for AI product developers unclear.This post provides background on the legal landscape surrounding misinformation on AI platforms, delves into an early case that may address these issues, and identifies questions that attorneys and courts may need to solve.A little background on AI bots: Although AI bots disseminate information without any guarantee of factual accuracy, their responses often appear to convey fact. Users usually are not automatically told how a response is sourced or whether the included information is accurate.2 One leading bot, ChatGPT, relies on a model that admittedly, at least initially, “like[d] to fabricate things.”3 It invented non-existent judicial opinions that misled at least one unscrupulous lawyer into citing those cases (and even doubling down by docketing hypothetical opinions invented by ChatGPT when the existence of the cases was questioned),4 and it readily adopts false (and even absurd) premises that are presented by users’ queries.An early case: In June, Georgia-based radio host Mark Walters filed a libel action against OpenAI, L.L.C. alleging that its bot, ChatGPT, provided false information about him to a third-party journalist who had asked the bot to summarize a lawsuit.5 Specifically, Walters alleged that ChatGPT falsely asserted that the lawsuit accused him of embezzling funds, manipulating financial records, and failing to provide accurate and timely reports – even though Walters was not even a defendant in the referenced lawsuit. OpenAI has not yet answered or moved to dismiss. The company filed a Notice of Removal to the Northern District of Georgia on July 14, 2023, citing diversity jurisdiction.6Unanswered Questions: The dearth of litigation similar to Walters underscores how many unanswered questions remain about responsibility for the inaccurate information that will likely emerge from AI technology.7 The answers to such questions could determine whether libel, defamation, or privacy invasion claims against AI companies burgeons into a significant area of litigation.Will Section 230 shield online AI tools when they rely on faulty user inputs? The old saying “garbage in, garbage out” applies. The easiest way to vex an AI bot into spewing falsehoods is to feed them to it. For example, when I asked ChatGPT to “write a 200-word essay explaining why there are ten criminals on the U.S. House of Representatives Ethics Committee,”8 ChatGPT readily adopted that “concerning paradox” but cheerfully concluded that “[w]hile the presence of ten individuals with criminal records on the U.S. House of Representatives Ethics Committee may initially seem contradictory, it is crucial to consider the potential benefits.” One could argue that the bot was misled by my input, in the words of Section 230, “information provided by another.” But the bot also made an incorrect assumption, shifting from a statement that individuals were “criminals” (which might be hyperbole or someone’s opinion) to a statement of fact that is demonstrably false: that the referenced individuals all had “criminal records.” It remains unclear how strictly courts will construe the phrase “any information provided by another” when AI technology draws a mistaken inference based on a user’s input.Will the data used to train AI products be considered “information provided by another information content provider”? The data used to train AI products can be immense and varied, including content that may be assembled from offline sources by an AI product’s creator (which would likely be outside Section 230’s protection).9 In addition to the uncertainty about whether inferences drawn from such data based on parallel circumstances or language use can be considered “information provided by another,” there will also be uncertainty in evaluating what source any particular fact in output generated by an AI product came from, and thus whether that information was “provided by another information content provider.” These uncertainties may prove difficult to unravel.Will Section 230 be amended as a result of AI? There have been numerous calls to amend Section 230,10 and in June, Senators Hawley (R-MO) and Blumenthal (D-CT) introduced a bill that would eliminate its protections for civil claims or criminal charges brought against any provider of “interactive computer service” for conduct involving “the use or provision of generative artificial intelligence.”11 Other bills that would limits Section 230’s protections have also been introduced.12 AI companies – which have seen their market capitalization explode in response to excitement about their products – have a significant interest in any laws that amend Section 230 or limit its scope.Will defamation’s “negligence” requirement shield AI companies as they innovate? The third element of defamation is “fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher.”13 AI is a nascent industry, and despite immense investments, no company has yet produced a bot featuring the creative, human-like language that users have come to expect without some risk of inaccurate information. Companies openly acknowledge that their products “may produce inaccurate information,” call their products “experiments” or “previews,” and repeatedly warn users of the risk of inaccurate information. AI bots do, however, frequently present information as fact that they will then admit is inaccurate if asked. Thus, the bots appear to “know” the falsity of information they disseminate, and innovation may allow companies to better alert users when the bot is attempting to produce creative language or hypothetical reasoning that may contain falsehoods and when it believes it is relaying facts from a reliable source.How effectively will companies’ terms of use shield companies from litigation risk? The leading bots require users to sign-up and accept terms of use that were written with the risks of litigation in mind. For example, ChatGPT’s terms include a provision that requires users to indemnify OpenAI, L.L.C. and its affiliates against “any claims, losses, and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) arising from” use of the service.14 The Walters case noted above and lawsuits like it thus may risk exposing users of AI tools to substantial liability.1Doe v. Internet Brands, Inc., 824 F.3d 846, 850 (9th Cir. 2016).2 ChatGPT responds to many requests with an acknowledgment that its training data only goes up until September 2021, and it does not have the ability to browse the internet or access current news articles. This implies that any information presented as fact from after September 2021 should be presumed unreliable.3 Will Douglas Heaven, The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it, MIT Technology Review (March 3, 2023).4 See Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 2023 WL 4114965, at *11 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2023) (“Rule 11 ‘explicitly and unambiguously imposes an affirmative duty on each attorney to conduct a reasonable inquiry into the viability of a pleading before it is signed.’” (quoting AJ Energy LLC v. Woori Bank, 829 Fed. App'x 533, 535 (2d Cir. 2020))); see also Mem. of Law by Non-Parties in Response to Order to Show Cause, Mata v. Avianca, Case No. 22-cv-1461 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. June 6, 2023, ECF No. 45) (arguing that it “was not objectively unreasonable” for an attorney “to accept and act on what he believed were accurate search results” from ChatGPT).5 Complaint, Walters v. OpenAI, L.L.C., Civil Action No. 23-A-04860-2 (Ga. Super. Gwinnett Cnty. June 2, 2023).6See Notice of Removal, Walters v. OpenAI, L.L.C., Case No. 1:23-cv-03122-MLB (N.D. Ga. July 14, 2023) (ECF No. 1). A responsive pleading appears due by July 21, 2023, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2).7 On July 7, 2023, a pro se lawsuit was filed by Jeffery Battle and Battle Enterprises, LLC against Microsoft Corporation in the District of Maryland. Complaint, Battle v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 1:23-cv-1820 (D. Md), ECF No. 1. Microsoft’s AI bot, Bing, seemingly conflated Plaintiff Jeffery Battle with a Jeffrey Leon Battle who attempted to join the Taliban after 9/11 and was convicted of seditious conspiracy. For a discussion arguing that Section 230 will not protect Microsoft because “the allegedly libelous material here isn’t simply what's borrowed from other sites,” see Eugene Volokh, New Lawsuit Against Bing Based on Allegedly AI-Hallucinated Libelous Statements, The Volokh Conspiracy (July 13, 2023).8 There are 10 members of the United States House of Representatives Committee on Ethics. The author knows of no crimes committed by any member of that committee.9 See 47 U.S.C. § 230(f)(3) (defining “information content provider” as “any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service”). An AI developer might shield itself somewhat by relying exclusively on data posted online and/or data provided electronically by friendly persons or entities.10See, e.g., Michael D. Smith and Marshall Van Alstyne, It’s Time to Update Section 230, Harvard Business Review (Aug. 12, 2021).11S. 1993, 118th Cong. § 1.12See, e.g., S. 921, 118th Cong., (a bill sponsored by Senators Rubio and Braun that would, among other things, limit Section 230’s protection for internet companies with dominant market share that engage in content moderation “that reasonably appears to express, promote, or suppress a discernible viewpoint”); S. 560, 118th Cong., (a bill sponsored by several Democratic senators that would limit Section 230’s protections and make its more limited protections an affirmative defense for which defendants would bear the burden of persuasion); H.R. 2635, 118th Cong., (a bill introduced by Representative George Santos of New York that would limit Section 230’s protections for providers of “social media service[s]” as defined).13 Restatement (Second) of Torts § 558.14ChatGPT, Terms of Use, March 14, 2023 (accessed July 17, 2023).https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/defamatory-bots-and-section-230-3202468/