Posts by beardstack@defcon.social
(DIR) Post #ASks5m4EMoW02yDH2e by beardstack@defcon.social
2023-02-14T17:52:27Z
1 likes, 1 repeats
Anyone checked out this project? I find the whole ecosystem very interesting. https://github.com/oxen-io/lokinet/
(DIR) Post #ASlsl1LSfAwwSftscS by beardstack@defcon.social
2023-02-14T18:25:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@cryptologer i know right? I am too busy at the moment but I was trying to get a dockerized version working - but using namespaces for enhanced security, I didn't get far. I love the project though. I was wondering if anyone has been auditing the code or has anything bad to say about it.
(DIR) Post #ASlsl2If74IxQHb9tY by beardstack@defcon.social
2023-02-14T20:04:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@cryptologer yeah definitely high barrier to entry when it comes to the code. They are doing some refactoring lately which IMO is going to make things easier in the future to contribute.
(DIR) Post #AT1SaetvlXifg4mRO4 by beardstack@defcon.social
2023-02-25T00:03:20Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@jeff @cryptologer what's a better way to containerize? LXC?
(DIR) Post #AT7GKArFfHplMieyTA by beardstack@defcon.social
2023-02-27T17:51:59Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@jeff @cryptologer I wasn't really aware of this. I've been trying to containerize using docker because it is popular and well documented.I use namespaces with docker to limit what would happen if a breach occurred. I'm still learning. I wanted to do something with lokinet as a way to further anonymize my traffic. I selfhost certain applications for my everyday use in order not to use big tech without getting tracked.I linked to an example docker compose stack I route to route some traffic through proton. I use something like this for my internet queries and share it with friends. I reviewed it with the docker people who told me it was good and followed best practices. I wanted to do something similar which would have a .loki address but I haven't had time to do it yet. Input is welcomehttps://github.com/beardstack/whoogle-protonvpn