Posts by avis_jay@squawk.social
 (DIR) Post #AZpFB1vJo8COOAiqjA by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2023-08-12T13:09:42Z
       
       2 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Apperently it's #AnthroBirdAppreciationDaySo here I am!
       
 (DIR) Post #AZpFB3fRK8gZnVJCFs by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2023-08-12T15:58:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Art by https://twitter.com/demicoeurart
       
 (DIR) Post #AdV0v2QP56M6DTJ8qm by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2024-01-03T14:00:48Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       #AIArtDiscussion #AIArtI just had a thought about the whole topic. Some people say AI Art is Art, because the "Artist" is providing the prompt. If the AI is really creating Art, on an abstract level it's not different from commissioning an artist. They create the art, based on your descriptions. In German Law (I don't know about other countries), there is a difference between the Creator and the Copyright Holder. The creator automatically has the copyright, but he can sign it off to another person. That signing off is a legal process. But an AI isn't a person. It can't enter into a contract. So the commissioner can't acquire the copyright from it. But the AI itself can't hold a copyright, as it isn't a person. So all AI Art should be copyright free.
       
 (DIR) Post #AdV2BMPwcJL2oGRLJg by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2024-01-04T10:35:09Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wauz But that's written down in their contract.
       
 (DIR) Post #AdV4IP75Byz36d6VRw by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2024-01-04T10:58:51Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wauz But you aren't paying the AI, or offering them some other type of compensation. So they aren't your employee.
       
 (DIR) Post #AdV9sdQRxLCHgtG4rg by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2024-01-04T12:01:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wauz In dem Fall ist eine große Frage: Stellt ein Prompt ein Werk mit ausreichender Schöpfungshöhe dar, um einen Urheberrechtlichen Schutz zu verdienen. Und sowohl die Deutschen, als auch die Amerikanischen Gerichte habe entschieden, dass dies nicht der Fall ist.
       
 (DIR) Post #AdVABZBTwwnK2RHhWi by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2024-01-04T12:04:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wauz In that case, the big question is: Does writing a prompt need a high enough level of creativity, to deserve protection under copyright law. German and us court's independently decided that's not the case.
       
 (DIR) Post #AdVDinY7rR2I0gPhrc by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2024-01-04T12:44:29Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wauz Yep. That's pretty much my argument. As the input of the user is too little. The AI should get the copyright. But it's not a person. So it can't hold the copyright. So it should be copyright free.
       
 (DIR) Post #AhY8xmNsrqcoIB4W6y by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2024-05-03T10:12:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Flaky I don't. I actually have all my music saved on my phone and it's slowly getting out of hand.
       
 (DIR) Post #AhgFJVTEaR6tCBzto0 by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2024-05-07T22:57:18Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @angeidheal @lgbtqia Still the best Doctor and proving again why he deserves that title
       
 (DIR) Post #AxgZMKbseGThsriAxU by avis_jay@squawk.social
       2025-08-23T15:41:33Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       And the birb is done!(The Head for now at least)Can't wait for the next @SwabianFurs Schdammi