Posts by aschatermees@mastodon.social
(DIR) Post #ATAn50FEip764E8EqG by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-03-01T13:30:09Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@stux 🤣😂 Er kleeft bloed aan onze fietspaden...!!!???
(DIR) Post #AaDpi1xEnD6NQVsRv6 by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-28T09:49:01Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster The one thing that requires a gun to legally protect oneself Is another gun.But do keep the arms industry happy.
(DIR) Post #AaDqKh1MYZennRF5dY by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-28T09:56:00Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster Hate to burst your bubble sir. The colonialists really didn't self-defend their way into the USA.
(DIR) Post #AaGU5pFK4v8vRf9p4K by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T16:30:56Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster in that case you should not sell but issue guns, to women only.
(DIR) Post #AaGXB110357pFxclUW by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T17:05:29Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster You're welcome
(DIR) Post #AaGXNJD4E9XrA38A5o by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T17:07:42Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster You're welcome. Meanwhile don't forget to retract any and all fire arms from men in the USA
(DIR) Post #AaGYAJ75NHt33FhHY8 by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T17:16:36Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster Didn't you just say that the gun is an equaliser for the woman against the fysically overpowering but otherwise unarmed man? How then is adding a gun to the male agressor providing the woman equality? Or should she just be holding the world at gunpoint from the moment she opens her front door?
(DIR) Post #AaGda9ibQVxtDJOFqS by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T18:17:16Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster "You didnt say “we shoudl ban all agressors from having guns” .. you said all men." Yes, I said "all men". Like you point out, it's hard to decide who will and who will not become violent. As for logics, I wish I could turn around your rhetoric: Not just any man is a potential agressor. I wish I could state in return that not just any woman is a potential victim. She is.
(DIR) Post #AaGtL9QxnhrlFp0U88 by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T18:36:38Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster "She should have one in her purse in case she gets raped.."Should you ever decide to study the stat's on rape, you would learn that it mostly takes place inside the victims home, by a person known to her, and often in situations where one would not carry a purse.In fact, there is no way an external defensive device could ever "equalize" the difference in body mass, fysical reach or musclepower.
(DIR) Post #AaH2Z1XcqCWuPwoS2a by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T22:57:12Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster "thus it is sexist to deny her the right to protect herself and have equal access to security." Of course she does. This is not synonimous for owning or using a gun though. Because the right you claim she has is in fact the right to safety and to bodily integrity. Needing to protect oneself is a requirement, not a right, and certainly not a privilege to access a gun.
(DIR) Post #AaH3UnR5RVf3SxIo9g by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T23:04:37Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster "Thats quite naive.. If a man is 10 feet away then no matter what his body mass is, I can shoot him dead before he can get close enough to touch me.."It is quite naive to claim shooting a man at 10 feet distance beforehand of his agressive attack would be considered 'self defence'. That's very likely plain (attempted) murder in the eyes of a judge or jury.
(DIR) Post #AaH4nRjkRXV7ckUJPs by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T23:18:40Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster Therefore the right to bodily integrety is better protected by educating men and women on the topic while they're young.And at this point I can already imagine your return on something like words will not ever overpower bullets. But really that is just my final point: If guns over words define our rights, than we have no rights. Because guns are and will always be privilege.
(DIR) Post #AaH7IAthImS6HZvDGa by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-29T23:50:11Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster My bad, I misinterpreted your first response as being sarcastic, as I was being sarcastic.My final statement however bases on the reality that guns are NOT issued in accordance to feminin, or any other kind of emancipation. Guns require sale.And how would that idea work out? Should we consider emancipating minors too? Should we emancipate minorities? Invalides? Where would we draw the line as to who gets to equalize their right to self defence?
(DIR) Post #AaH9iqVFR3kQl2Kb9U by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-30T00:11:40Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo @BenAveling @ErikUden @Elleaster Treading fine lines here... What amounts to one's right to defend? We would need reconsider the ethics on (now common) use of fire arms to protect wealth, power and property, as these things contradict emancipation and underline privilege.
(DIR) Post #AaH9tJgLnrFm9PW83s by aschatermees@mastodon.social
2023-09-30T00:18:54Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@freemo Not ignoring you, but needing to retire for the night now.