Posts by ammaratef45@social.coop
 (DIR) Post #Ar5uL9j8D8gdi0f2CO by ammaratef45@social.coop
       2025-02-13T22:16:20Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       #seattle #prop1a
       
 (DIR) Post #Ar5uLArK0ApfDhV5bU by ammaratef45@social.coop
       2025-02-13T22:17:20Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       #seattle #prop1a
       
 (DIR) Post #Ar5uLC3lXONewaKXdg by ammaratef45@social.coop
       2025-02-13T22:19:03Z
       
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       #seattle #prop1a
       
 (DIR) Post #Ar5uLK7bZ0ClwoBijY by ammaratef45@social.coop
       2025-02-13T22:20:25Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       #seattle #prop1a
       
 (DIR) Post #Ayp4iAdi2yJIcb8Vwe by ammaratef45@social.coop
       2025-10-03T05:51:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wjmaggos before I vote, what does this mean technically? The way I understand it is that AP is message passing and ATProto is shared heap, how would they become interoperable without a bridge unless you change the specs of one or both of them?
       
 (DIR) Post #Ayp8pwwpEg9CI62hNo by ammaratef45@social.coop
       2025-10-03T06:37:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wjmaggos a mastodon instance doing translation from ATProto to AP would be like it running both protocols (unless im misunderstanding), given how insanely expensive it is to run a blusky instance (perhaps why we got only one instance of it) that is a suicide move by Mastodon to do it (I took mastodon and blusky here as examples)The shared heap is pretty large and is growing and AP prides itself in the ability for it to be deployed on stuff like a raspberry piSo my vote will be no