Posts by XEJKnol@infosec.exchange
 (DIR) Post #AdeUhGSk3Xm71iO9wm by XEJKnol@infosec.exchange
       2024-01-08T23:56:10Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @gsuberland perhaps try rock linux it should be redhat compatible
       
 (DIR) Post #AqUJmkE8kln9BgU0rQ by XEJKnol@infosec.exchange
       2025-01-26T22:26:22Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @puppygirlhornypost2 that is certainly true, especially with there being CP instances floating about, how do you deal with that btw, are there global block lists being distributed?Don’t want to setup an instance only to get police mocking on my door.
       
 (DIR) Post #AqUKexZzKFJcEjYQ2S by XEJKnol@infosec.exchange
       2025-01-26T22:43:00Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @david @david @puppygirlhornypost2 in general I agree but blocklists can form a good starting point if they reference reasons for an instance being included, and as always it’s a game of trust but verify.
       
 (DIR) Post #As1O2K5wxN0kUWZMjQ by XEJKnol@infosec.exchange
       2025-03-13T16:35:27Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @protagonist @frameworkcomputer it should just depend on what will fit into memory