Posts by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
(DIR) Post #Ai0HzDtAQn1ftoLU0m by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-18T02:42:48.758157Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Tepid_Tapir Good because they aren't endangered, in the Rocky Mountain region they even introduced the wrong subspecies of the larger more aggressive Canadian Timber Wolf.The main reason it may seem vengeful is because the main proponents of wolf reintroduction have, under the bludgeon of federal law, maliciously gone out of their way to use them in trashing conservation efforts and people who rely on them. The Feds lied about their wolf reintroduction for decades while simultaneously threatening federal charges on anyone who were dealing with its problems. Because of the lawfare against them, Rocky Mountain states did not even start to get a handle on it until like 2010.Any of the environmentalists with the obsession of "restoring" the ecosystem to "pre-human" are reliably completely retarded regarding how ecosystems actually function and can just be summarized as "anti-human" with ecosystem mismanagement and federal law as the weapon. Anything that removes threat of federal charges against those who maintain their land is an improvement as people have been forced to quietly do it regardless.
(DIR) Post #Ai0QaYHaMxnTUu4sme by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-18T05:10:58.468204Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Tepid_Tapir >Both the Mackenzie (now Canadian) wolf and the Rocky Mt Wolf were found in that area.The current "Rocky Mountain Wolf" is quite literally just an alternative name coined for the introduced Northwestern Wolves or "Canadian Timber Wolves". The claim that there isn't a substantial difference between subspecies is true because they are just playing word games.They introduced Northwestern Wolves (Canis Lupus Occidentalis) in place of the smaller extinct Southern Rocky Mountain Wolf (Canis Lupus Youngi) and Prairie Wolf (Canis Lupus Nubilis). Aside from being larger on average their pack size is also larger on average than these two other subspecies. The purported aggression might just be derived from requiring more food but the difference in size, behavior and range has oft been repeated back to frontier days. They introduced the larger wolves with the position that "maybe they were also there" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ which is incredibly spurious. If there really isn't a difference in subspecies then they need to account for the actual current difference in size, this is all just ex post facto bullshit. The relevance of this is really just to illustrate their program has been poorly thought out which they have long been duplicitous about.They have constant problems maintaining a stable population in places they've been introduced which has still never been officially acknowledged. There is still all sorts of drivel being produced about how they regulate their own numbers, usually focusing on Yellowstone while completely ignoring the constant leakage of exiled wolves out of the park which are then left to be cleaned up by volunteers on the adjacent non federal park lands. For 20 years I have occasionally seen exiled wolves ~100mi outside of their "range" and the response from the government is "no you didn't, and don't shoot them it's illegal.". There's been a lot of shoot, shovel, shutup maintaining stable populations.People are tired of it and a change in the Endangered status will hopefully allow for more straight forward management efforts and maybe even Federal participation in it instead of just ignoring their problem they've forced on others.
(DIR) Post #Ai4mukY3S11MxDen8S by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-20T07:49:26.593467Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@Dagnar @judgedread Ham radio transmissions are all doxed to callsign. Any broadcasted wrong think is registered to your name while simultaneously drumming up all of the boomers who janny the airwaves to use the government against you. Same goes for pirate radio except the feds will actually kick your door in too.This is your worst post yet I suggest you print it out for posterity.
(DIR) Post #Ai4mumB5ONpw0YvTc0 by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-20T07:57:11.138775Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@Dagnar @judgedread >I confess lack of knowledge on a topic and you start making accusations.You are a waste of oxygen please tie a plastic bag around your head
(DIR) Post #Ai4ozEpB1hyVv8vwmW by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-20T07:50:29.123665Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@TheEternalBungholio @UnityOstara @grizzlywhisker @Frank_O_Pinon @Doll @graf Those were sweet and so was NOS before they halved the caffeine because some kid died from it >picrel
(DIR) Post #Ai5Yam5EpSArivie1o by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-18T08:31:30.088077Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Tepid_Tapir Fair enough, I understand the taxonomy is constantly changing, not just with wolves but with everything really. Frankly a lot of it is kind of arbitrary anyway which is why it gets changed. I know you're into those specifics but I am not. I am just using the old but relevant classifications of "Prairie/Plains Wolf", C. l. nubilus (which also later includes C. l. irremotus) and the "Southern Mountain Wolf" C. l. youngi. These are all described as smaller than the more northern C. l. occidentalis or "Timber wolves".I don't care how the delineation between these very well documented extirpated wolves of medium size and the introduced larger wolves is classified.>C. l. nubilusarchive.org/details/extinctvanishing00allerich/page/218/mode/2up>C. l. irremotusarchive.org/details/extinctvanishing00allerich/page/208/>C. l. youngiarchive.org/details/extinctvanishing00allerich/page/226/mode/2up?Goldman's summaries just track with common knowledge. Wolves in the states were attested to being smaller, from the frontier until their extirpation. Anybody claiming there isn't a significant well known difference is a liar, which I've only seen government funded stooges claim. Most of the wildlife biology in this area has been fudged so ideological boomers can obstinately forge ahead to make a mess of things with their dumb ideas. The introduced wolves remain larger than the extinct wolves and it is certainly a factor in their constant overrunning of game populations.
(DIR) Post #Ai5aL1fnIbyTLhR6EC by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-20T17:15:04.745417Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@deprecated_ii @sickburnbro shieeet
(DIR) Post #AiA9O7PUhPdn2TrUBs by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-22T22:01:28.127571Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@Dicer @monsterislandcolonizer @GoodBoyUV HAAAANKTITS ARE A DECEPTIONGO TO THE SOURCEHAAAAAAAAANK
(DIR) Post #AiAFmTHLdwZ7XR2yDg by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-22T23:17:18.974174Z
2 likes, 0 repeats
@StoleMyThundersBalls @NitroDubs Great year for revolvers and the .32 come back is long overdue
(DIR) Post #AiBjwdmmcnUynuTYKe by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-21T21:41:58.370139Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Tepid_Tapir The taxonomies are developed from Goldman.here is a quick summary academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/103/6/1305/6644404 Supplementary materials are good charts.These native wolves were not eliminated that long ago. Their nature is not some unclear nebulous thing. It took mass organization of men to remove them. The accounts from the frontier are very clear in that they were not the largest subspecies of wolf on the continent, but that is what they chose to transplant. The relevant Rocky Mountain subspecies do not have overlap with the Mackenzie valley wolves. At the time it was suggested there were more fitting candidates other than the Mackenzie Valley wolves but they were chosen simply because it was easy. They repeatedly lied about their activities transplanting Timber Wolves(Occidentalis) and claimed to be working with the "The Native Northern Rocky Mountain Wolves" using the verbal switcheroo.archive.org/details/uap_9781772121742/page/354/There aren't ungulate population booms to the point that wolves are needed. The entire framing is rhetorical and statements claiming wolves autonomously contribute to this in any meaningful manner are simply false. Generally these statements come from parkland studies being disingenuously applied to normal ecosystems. One that is misused a lot is that island in Minnesota which is a closed ecosystem. Or even Yellowstone where they claim equilibrium while ignoring the wolf leakage which largely populated the rest of Wyoming. The federally funded wildlife studies have been done very much in the same way as climate science where data is selectively collected and massaged to fit the models. Wildlife biologists know better than this, they are lying to sow narratives and in exchange get salaries/grants. They are stooges. Conservation plans have long managed game populations just fine by adjusting hunting quotas in response to the game population. What is needed now is to also manage wolf populations in this manner. Outside of studies where they can pretend wolves are in a closed ecosystemIdaho did a good job summarizing what has actually been observed since introduction: They wipe out the ungulate population and then go after cattle and pets often traveling vast distances.>https://idfg.idaho.gov/sites/default/files/idaho-gray-wolf-management-plan-2023-2028.pdf>Idaho’s wolf population has exceeded delisting criteria established by the USFWS since 2002,well before the original delisting in 2008. Intensive population monitoring from 2019, 2020, and 2021 indicate Idaho’s wolf population fluctuated around 1,270 wolves annually during that period, varying from a high of around 1,600 following reproduction in the spring to a low of around 850 just prior to denning. In the 2009 delisting rule (USFWS 2009), USFWS recognized that after delisting, wolves in the NRM DPS would be managed by the states, National Park Service, and USFWS in their respective jurisdictions to average over 1,100 wolves, fluctuatingaround 400 in Montana, 500 in Idaho, and 200-300 in Wyoming. Above this level, the USFWS stated, conflicts would be expected to increase as wolves occupied more unsuitable habitat. The USFWS further contended it would be difficult to maintain the wolf population above 1,500 wolves in the NRM because suitable habitat would be fully occupied and packs attempting to colonize unsuitable habitat would cause chronic conflict with livestock and long-termdetrimental impacts to their ungulate prey base (USFWS 2009).The wolf population in Idaho alone exceeds what the USFWS considered to be the carrying capacity of wolves in the entire NRM DPS. At this high level of abundance in Idaho, wolf predation has contributed to substantial declines in elk and moose populations, and chronic conflicts with livestock have been significant, with nearly 1,300 verified livestock losses affecting 299 producers since 2014. We know these verified losses represent only the minimumof total wolf-related lossesThe plans to reduce numbers up to 90% are in line with available habitat and the earlier population goals. There isn't enough food to go around in the back country, there never has been and even during Lewis and Clark's days there was barely any game back there, it just doesn't support the biomass. Wolves operate in the front country because that is where there's food and that means they take cattle. Wolves are established well and they will never go away again without another organized mass movement to eradicate them. The whole issue is on the legal side where certain states are not able to manage the wolf population directly. Rocky mountain states are allowed a handle on it now but the Upper Midwest is not. There are constant lawsuits from both sides going through the courts about this and it won't end until there is a reclassification of federal protection status for wolves.
(DIR) Post #AiBjwfehfoDwbQi812 by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-22T04:33:01.855945Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Tepid_Tapir >If you're going to call someone a liar, you will have to provide significant proof.Oh yeah here's a list of major lies observed during their program:The Federal Government repeatedly lied about the areas and scale of wolf introduction.When the Federal Government first started secretly releasing wolves within states without telling them, the states only found out as soon as they did because one of them promptly walked many miles out of the wilderness area into the front country and killed livestock. States were then not given straight answers about what was being done, only to be threatened not to interfere with endangered animals. They were releasing Timber Wolves but postured as though they were working with existing Northern Rocky Mountain Wolves. Again, these wolves are not actually endangered it is just a legal bludgeon.Initial population targets to delist wolves as "endangered" were hit 20 years ago until they were revised, and then again, multiple times in order to keep from passing management control to the States. Federal management consisted of doing nothing while wolf population exploded until 2010ish when management was handed over to some States who then scrambled to cull the population. The government has repeatedly under counted wolf populations literally just stopping the count when they hit their target marks to validate models unrelated to the actual ecosystem. States have launched wolf hunts to cull overpopulation and have been overwhelmed by the first few days catch, the numbers are vastly understated. wpr.org/agriculture/dnr-wisconsin-wolf-population-dropped-14-percent-after-controversial-wolf-hunt-last-year There are other articles from other hunts in other states. 15% of their wolves were not killed in 3 days. The government repeatedly lied about the range of wolves in relation to above and even insisted their range was specifically limited to federal land tracts and they wouldn't go outside of it.They actively gaslit citizens with baldface lies like the above while simultaneously threatening them with federal charges if they did anything to protect themselves, for years.The goal of the program has always been to pursue the 1970s hippie boomer environmentalist ideal to "unspoil" the land and create an eco system unneeded to be managed by man. It is entirely motivated by an ideology these boomers got from Bambi. Frankly these people were primarily motivated by spite, 90s environmentalism hits different. The program was not planned out scientifically it was entirely decoupled from ecology and conservation. They repeatedly lied to manage dissent and criticism often unnecessarily, showing extreme disdain and neglect for the effected ruralites and ranchers dealing with the fallout.It was an immediate problem thrust upon people who never asked for it. They were then forced to fulfill unrealistic and changing Federal requirements.And that's all in the past. Wolves are thriving and not endangered. They are not going away. The histrionics about "Save the Wolves" is complete nonsense. Federal law roadblocks have consistently only hurt management efforts. Now that the boomers are retiring/dying maybe a more normal approach can be taken.
(DIR) Post #AiDBzcvfG4u8tFnme8 by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-24T08:16:42.157004Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@PonyPanda @Terry @PopulistRight My dude Kharkov is the definition of industrial center and fortress. Bakhmut is barely comparable in both categories. Kharkov even has a massive tunnel system designed for their historic tank production as part of the soviet defensive doctrine.
(DIR) Post #AiDeNh0MYOEZCJGOB6 by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-05-24T08:12:29.946218Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Tepid_Tapir >So I'm not sure the point you were trying to make with this source.The link summarizes the development and controversies of North American wolf taxonomy. Goldman, Hall, Nowak charts are relevant. There are plenty of relevant citations also worth pouring over like: meridian.allenpress.com/naf/article/doi/10.3996/nafa.77.0001/438435/An-Account-of-the-Taxonomy-of-North-AmericanIf you were pouring over the SDM that wasn't the point I should've been more clear. SDM projections are not species range estimations. That research and the other research cited in the Discussion section is more about trying to figure out what circumstances affected the dispersion of wolves such that the subspecies' physical traits diverge.>Interestingly, our results suggest that wolves from Jasper and those historically present in Yellowstone belong to the same bioclimatic group"Yes, they selected wolves from Jasper specifically because of the similarity of climate. That is by no means a suggestion of shared subspecies. References a good legal summary though. They were operating with complete admission they are different species and not endangered except as a legal bludgeon. omnilearn.net/esacourse/pdfs/Wolf_expertimental_population_comment.pdf (Brown 2000)The complaints about the subspecies of larger size is particularly leveraged at the 1996 wolves brought in from the Halfway and Besa Rivers. They are larger boreal wolves which compounded with the issue of lack of management when they quite literally had a free lunch for ~15 years. web.archive.org/web/20150218043659/http://www.forwolves.org/ralph/wpages/1995idahowolves.htmweb.archive.org/web/20150218043856/https://www.forwolves.org/ralph/wpages/1996idahowolves.htmnpshistory.com/publications/yell/ycr/wolf-reports/1995-1996.pdfLast time I'll be posting about this. I stated the neglectfulness of the wolf-reintroduction program and cited the taxonomy they themselves were working off of. It's right there, with modern refinements, you can read up on it. There is a consistent delineation between Occidentalis and southern wolves with Occidentalis repeatedly stated as larger. It is a matter of public record that is what they brought in.
(DIR) Post #AlFGsbfpi4SDfYRBIG by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-08-23T03:01:20.599820Z
1 likes, 1 repeats
@Witch_Hunter_Siegfired @realman543 @BowsacNoodle @HarryNuggets @givenup Matt Landman has organized together a lot of the publicly available information in the resources section here. actualactivists.com/chemtrails/
(DIR) Post #AlslwNaKhx0msNa4tE by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-03-07T09:47:28.161719Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Sky_Frog Yeah man it's weird I thought he was serious about WN but all he does is shitpost and have fun
(DIR) Post #B1isimta1TfocvOdM0 by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-03-13T05:55:20.894894Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@werefeat035 @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired @gnarley_boot @Saber @SuperSnekFriend anime fans are just sick in the head
(DIR) Post #B1isioGev9jEsnCZxw by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-03-13T06:06:14.619370Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@boburtle @werefeat035 @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired @gnarley_boot @Saber @SuperSnekFriend The reality is women are the most vile contemptible creatures in creation if they do not resist the curse of eve and unfathomably wonderful when they do.
(DIR) Post #B1isiq7A3RJsbum1RI by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-03-13T06:14:21.700066Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@werefeat035 @boburtle @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired @gnarley_boot @Saber @SuperSnekFriend In the US Feminism began as a top down social engineering push in the 1900s. They rolled it back because of the great war and didn't resume until the 1960s. At least get it right dweeb.
(DIR) Post #B1isirKfWhicO66K8G by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-03-13T06:23:36.062908Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@werefeat035 @boburtle @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired @gnarley_boot @Saber @SuperSnekFriend This nigger wants a source for first-wave feminism
(DIR) Post #B1isishORhUScrjzBw by ProfessionalNEET@poa.st
2024-03-13T06:26:48.474139Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@werefeat035 @boburtle @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired @gnarley_boot @Saber @SuperSnekFriend Wrong, it came out of Yankee shitlibery cults like in Seneca Falls and others. I know you are entirely unaware of all of that. Stop posting cringe nigga