Posts by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
 (DIR) Post #AEGi7VqYSbSffCnya0 by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-10T16:06:00.402179Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @EmmaFaber @HonkHill @Zennblack @retarded_online Yes, but note that "rights" for the majority of men have been very few and narrow until the last hundred years.But I agreed that women seem (permanently?) disadvantaged to suffer a  lower-status existence. In my view, this is due to the mutually-reinforcing features of: - the biological advantages of men (more born; usually stronger/faster; no reproductive burden; usually more competitive/aggressive/risk-taking);- the innate, *human* psychological mechanisms of---"us-them" (i.e. sex difference creates ingroup favouritism)---animalistic obsession with power (whether protective or expansive) and meaningfulness ---broader social "us-them" (men & women vs. "othered" men & women)- the social basis of most cultures involving concepts of "warrior/territory/status" resulting in the common practices of war, rape, slavery (& usually reinforced by women since men are usually the bulwark against outsider-male violence)are all going to create a high probability of female subjection and social hierarchy.That said, though civilisation comes with evident costs (& is shored up by the potential for male violence via policing/military), we do seem to have a situation where women can start to win status via non-violent means.Perhaps we have to be highly populous/civilised or extremely small/primitive for sex-equality to be a likely outcome.
       
 (DIR) Post #AELtoelYQDMzT3w5C4 by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-13T04:37:30.850564Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Social media manipulation and apparently "just causes" now hold sway over society. This destructive grip of TRAs, BLM-racists, leftist-authoritarians & others, echoes the 1918 CHEKA style of Communist "revolutionary conscience" - whereby people would be destroyed not because of what they had done, but because of who they were, or who they knew:BELIEVE THE VICTIM"Me Too" got us all very used to a "guilt until proven innocent" habit of vilifying men who were both rightly & wrongly implicated in sexual immorality or sex crime.BELIEVE THE SCIENCEAmericans are exhorted to "believe the science" while Dr. Fauci dissembles before Congress and dissenting scientists are suppressed or misrepresented.BELIEVE THE BLACK MANThen BLM - another cause that seemed righteous - quietly rioted over the summer, destroying government buildings & private property. One of their leaders - Melina Abdullah, (former professor of Pan-African Studies at California State University) wrote: “In our commitment to abolition, we can never believe police… over Jussie Smollett, a Black man.."BELIEVE THE CHILDNo-one is allowed to argue with a child if they claim to be one of the ~103 types of trans. and demands life-long medical treatment.
       
 (DIR) Post #AELtofYTUKV9ump9Rg by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-13T05:07:55.037131Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @sleepwalker Wake up sleepwalker. You don't want to live in a world where protected classes of people can destroy the reputations of others by making unsubstantiated claims. A proper system of justice protects everyone & deals with the guilty in a fair way.
       
 (DIR) Post #AEM05rN7PF2dDD5npQ by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-13T05:38:14.847105Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @sleepwalker The point is that justice for women won't be found in "BELIEVE THE..." Internet trends, because these trends are morally vacuous.
       
 (DIR) Post #AEP2jvOy7AZ6wBHhA0 by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-14T18:16:11.092228Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       If you are lucky enough to live in a democracy like America, you may be watching in horror as dictator & KGB agent "President" Putin pushes to invade further into the democracy of Ukraine. However, some analysts have a positive view of this situation, which I'd like to share here:
       
 (DIR) Post #AEPnHTk23b2Yt74g5o by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-15T01:27:41.303605Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Gnomeshatecheese Yes - the east side of Europe should be defended in no uncertain terms. Ukraine should have been in NATO by now. But - as happened before - the west is scared to fight and trying to appease a vicious tyrant instead.
       
 (DIR) Post #AEPwLKQfWMtmkgvaim by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-15T04:44:33.502587Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @polarisera Indeed!When a mobile-porn device with it's own camera isn't enough, it's time to convince women to turn the cameras upon themselves...! What a stupid world.
       
 (DIR) Post #AET7sIF2MDUuUfHwWG by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-16T17:44:32.484685Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       "Conversations with Coleman" is usually good.Unfortunately, he uncritically uses terms like "cisgender" is his conversation with Michelle Telfer*Telfer's spiel has a reasonable tone but is really questionable... Examples:She remarks that -she serves "the trans community" (not the community generally), -expresses certainty while also noting the lack of longitudinal studies (regarding her medical interventions into the lives of children ages 3 years to 18 years), and says things like:-and says things like: "No one can change another person's identity." (see 35:20 of the podcast)This particular statement sounds like a thought-terminating cliché - especially given that Dr. Telfer ALSO says "identity is immutable" BUT ALSO that it changes... Uh, what !?To "steel-man" her contradictions, we could assume that Dr. Telfer is referring to that "innate" sense of "identity" that people supposedly have and which is (presumably) so subject to any type of outside influence. This "steel-man" version of her argument would also support her assertion that "gender affirming treatment" allows children to "express who they are inside."There are many more oddities here (e.g. comparing young, high-performing female gymnasts & ballerinas to the effects of "puberty-blockers") and unfortunately Coleman is ignorant of the wider debate, or afraid of getting cancelled.https://youtu.be/i2bn_QoCExY*Paediatrician and Adolescent Medicine Physician. She is currently the Director of the Department of Adolescent Medicine at The Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) Melbourne. She is also the Director of the RCH Gender Service
       
 (DIR) Post #AEUqERbio2Qz3NEQBE by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-17T13:27:56.729991Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @EmmaFaber @RockTheBoat @misssarcasm "Transgenderism" isn't really about "gender", sex, or sexuality - it's about power.Men love to beat, threaten, & destroy other men, as well as women.Trannies enjoy that same level of violence, but with a twist -  they are marking themselves as "inferior" by wearing dresses & wigs (i.e. they appear "womanish" or gay to men).The reason for this costume is - if a tranny beats another man, then the tranny has succeeded in forcing the beaten man to reckon with his fears of homosexual rape & an uprising of "inferior" beings.The "sword wielding warrior-woman" rubbish is so appealing to the tranny lunatics because it is de-stabilising to men's concept of power (as well as de-stabilising to women - who they also hate).
       
 (DIR) Post #AEV1SbUfwcu3GVtFaK by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-17T15:43:12.262333Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @PennyLope Purple-haired Progressives celebrating Christmas !?!? 😂
       
 (DIR) Post #AEV1nNyfOQCTQVpO9Q by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-17T15:47:08.815917Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @HebrideanHecate @PennyLope in a similar vein, one of my favourite "news" articles is:https://babylonbee.com/news/you-just-dont-understand-socialism-like-i-do-says-college-freshman-to-man-escaping-socialism-on-raft?fbclid=IwAR1FQtJx7n5tbQ4T35DL5is5hi0gISgVtsJkkm4Y0tjGJ-Ft1JPqASHD-54
       
 (DIR) Post #AEVgT6dyE5IRznb0nQ by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-17T22:32:56.851522Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kathleenbee @senryu @Chronic-Yonic This is an outstanding & clear example of patriarchy - enabling violent criminals to opportunistically escape into women's prisons while treating the concerns of imprisoned women with utter contempt.
       
 (DIR) Post #AEXAtx5oAt64xNKXOy by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-18T16:34:05.867270Z
       
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @amerika @LadyMont @The_Quantum_Alpha @Hulkhogansextape @EmmaFaber I'm not proposing anything & I don't think that there's a way out of the cycles of violence humans live with - but consider what is obvious to anyone that reads history and looks at statistics. Men:-start & fight all wars-commit the most crimes, especially violent crimes, and sex crimes (murder, rape, domestic abuse, perversion, etc)-create & perpetuate human trafficking, slavery, & pornography-create & lead all criminal networks-create & lead all political/religious systems which subjugate women (whether theocracy or democracy)You could call these historical themes "patriarchy."There are exceptions to these general observations (as well as some women who support them & some men who resist them) - but this doesn't undermine that these general observations are also clearly true.In a strange way, this general truth does support the patriarchal claim: that women are inferior to men. But to be precise - this only shows that women are inferior to men in ONE SPECIFIC way: the capacity for violent conflict and killings of all kinds (whether organised or chaotic, ongoing or occasional, international or personal).The flip-side is that women are superior to men in a moral sense - that they do not do these things - and this is clearly the case because there are no obvious instances of women waging war, raping, trafficking & prostituting men, or oppressing men in the ways described above as "patriarchy".
       
 (DIR) Post #AEXKQuXHbKKKAcyKUi by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-18T18:23:58.805259Z
       
       2 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Quellist1 @EmmaFaber @Hulkhogansextape @LadyMont @The_Quantum_Alpha @amerika Of course there are women who are brutal, who kill, who enjoy violence.Of course women have supported tyrannies & married tyrants.But the point is - would these women have become tyrants if there wasn't a tyrant to marry?Would women create Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany if the men weren't already doing it?If women had THE SAME capacity for this kind of evil that men do THEN WOMEN WOULD BE DOING IT. The evidence would be throughout history.
       
 (DIR) Post #AEXQcSmPDs5FHowBYe by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-18T19:10:32.218637Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Debbie Hayton should be supported & embraced.Calls for her to "de-transition" are nothing but reactionary calls for ideological purity.Males like Debbie could easily belong to a special class of people who are physically supported & helped but not ideologically & practically perpetuated. To explain by analogy - the approx 10,000 victims of the Thalidomide drug are a consequences of medical error that affected children and their mothers. Thalidomide victims are supported by society, but will eventually pass-away. A similar thing could be done by preventing the mutilating people for cosmetic reasons ("transitioning"). The victims of this current malpractice should be helped as a special and temporary class. This doesn't mean that they can encroach upon or destroy sex-based rights, but they shouldn't be stigmatised & pressured into further medical experimentation aka "de-transitioning."Again - Debbie is an important voice who can help end another  "biggest man‐made medical disaster ever." *https://debbiehayton.com*quote fromhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26043938/
       
 (DIR) Post #AEXcK5hfTqyDxBj9iC by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-18T18:43:26.038112Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Quellist1 @EmmaFaber @Hulkhogansextape @LadyMont @The_Quantum_Alpha @amerika If you don't like historical evidence, consider biology:Males must usually compete for a mate. They have a very wide variety of competitive means:-claim a stake to resources-planning/deception against other males (or females)-physical display/ social or hierarchical status-physical contest (being faster, stronger, etc.)The males reproductive burden is to be physically & mentally attuned to this type of struggle, which has clear social consequences.Obviously females also compete to mates, resources, hierarchy, etc. but the female reproductive burden is geared towards relationships (at least between mother & child - even an egg needs to be properly placed, nested, covered, etc.).This is a basic biological difference in (most of) nature.For animals as complex as humans, the psycho-social consequences are complex and interwoven - but fundamentally informed by this difference.I recognise that to some degree I'm forcing a moral conclusion (e.g. violence is an evil thing) that we could certainly argue.But moralising aside - men are clearly the driver for violent acts (whether these are righteous self-defences, a just-war, or sadistic rapes and brutal massacres).
       
 (DIR) Post #AEa6gKQCpB9yui00Jc by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-20T02:25:23.297417Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @EmmaFaber @amerika @Hulkhogansextape @LadyMont @Quellist1 @The_Quantum_Alpha @spin Yes, the evidence is that males are genetically inferior to females.Essentially, male "superiority" is simply their greater ability to enact (& perhaps organise) violence.Because females often need males to protect them from other males, it's easy to buy into their systems of violence.Again, this isn't to say women can't be deeply flawed, cruel, etc. But the weight of historical & biological evidence is that males have inferior genes and superior capacity for sexual & physical violence.
       
 (DIR) Post #AEaDqDw0Uu5vMxXVFw by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2021-12-20T02:37:13.951204Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I'm certainly basing my opinions on what (little?) I know about Hayton. What I've read & heard so far seems reasonable, but I don't have a dogmatic perspective, so we'll see I guess.But all of this feedback is interesting & shows me that I need to look a little deeper into this. That said, I don't think AGPs are all demented & throw-away people. I'm also sure that there are (de)transgender people worth listening to. Plus, I'm much less concerned about trendy self-mutilation chosen by adults than I am compared to how this strange "life-style" is destroying women's rights & the proliferation of a bullshit ideology that harms children & undermines important social institutions (schools, hospitals, etc.).
       
 (DIR) Post #AFGbGsnyrL3n6f34lM by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2022-01-09T14:24:56.109757Z
       
       2 likes, 0 repeats
       
       We have professional (& billions of not-professional) critics, reviewers, & commentary for EVERY type of media/content - movies, TV, video-games, internet sites, books, etc.Well - ALMOST every type...The "Woke" consumers of content will make a big fuss if the race (or other trendy "identity") of an actor doesn't "match" their movie character. Or if someone "appropriates culture" by wearing the "wrong" costume.BUT where is the Woke concern about pornography? Where is the concern of ANY kind of mainstream critic of our multi media?Pornography doesn't get the same attention, the same critique, and few raise issue with how it denigrates every class of woman - whether by racist, age, appearance... ad nauseam... The only "commentary" found is with the pornography itself - it is party of the pornography: "what a great scream this bitch has..."Younger people become aware of this silence - this taboo - and get the message: - here in the hidden-world of sexual-exploitation - of fucking women - all morality is suspended - ANYTHING GOES;- an unspoken world which is tacitly accepted to the point that it is within every pocket, bag, purse... upon every desk, table, lap... just clicks away... seconds away... available freely, in every form, and all with hardly a word of appraisal, analysis, or condemnation;- society is totally fine with this - enjoy it, or learn to enjoy it, or otherwise just pretend to forget it.IN THE FUTUREAs sex-exploitation, sex-crime, and sex-slavery become further legitimised as "sex-industry", "sex-work", and "sex-freedom" there will also be paid & celebrity critics & influencers who evaluate porn for "artistic merit" or "turn-on intensity" or other vacuous category -  but never with any kind of moral-framework: because these critics will be "objective" and "diverse" in their "tolerant" methods of consumption.
       
 (DIR) Post #AFGg0UCr35rRx5gTFA by Hemunculus@spinster.xyz
       2022-01-09T13:55:54.953880Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       This is an excerpt from a "Trans" safer-sex guide. I had to laugh.It's right at the beginning (p3) to reassure the reader that they're in a protected class of people: unquestionable themselves, but empowered to bellow out at any opportunity I AM A WOMAAAAAAN !!!