Posts by Fox@noagendasocial.com
(DIR) Post #AdNNbdIH2OIWS7XdZ2 by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2023-12-31T17:57:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@zonz "There only winning move is not to play." - War Games
(DIR) Post #AdSLEka4Y9wyH5cxXM by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-03T03:24:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Ubercat *Stares ahead blankly while answering*"yes" 🤣
(DIR) Post #AdXiZJW9dPth9nMvho by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-05T17:39:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@sirJoho Get an actual model, one that's uncensored, it can give you verbatim info on request.As for the copyright stuff... Sure, if it wasn't scrubbed from the training data, it'll be there too.It's a problem that's similar to the Banach–Tarski Paradox. Even if the actual data itself isn't stored in the AIs "memory" verbatim (ie. we can't actually see it). The training set and learning methods contain enough information about the info that a full reconstruction is likely possible.
(DIR) Post #AdXyQgKB4K1uYFfl9k by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-05T20:37:18Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@sirJoho Seriously? Models can't give verbatim data?Ok, fine.... you did this to yourself.Given a unique set of text that only appears in the training set in one or a few ways... How exactly do you think probabilities work in that fashion?I'll show you, it sure as fuck can give verbatim data... Not just a quote or a snippet, how about fucking paragraphs? I think I hear those monkeys calling you from the back room.Example:
(DIR) Post #AdY4YlOYhQReJrxV7w by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-05T21:45:59Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@sirJoho Right, because you can't be arsed to really parse what I'm saying. NYT and Wikipedia articles are less likely to be quoted verbatim because the same information is scattered about. Cause statistics and probability. But to flat out state something is not possible is utterly ignorant. If you have something unique, and it gets dumped into an LLM it can repeat it, doesn't matter what it is. If it's repetitive garbage, then you get the same garbage. Same with stable diffusion...
(DIR) Post #AdY9tdLKKcv5CMDa9A by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-05T22:45:47Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@sirJoho Well no.... It demonstrates the exact opposite... If Lincolns speech was copy written, we'd be screwed. Also, with prompting methods we might actually get it to dump the contents verbatim, the key is to hit the probability generator in the right spots. We're definitely not meeting eye to eye and I think your a little biased. I'm trying to say your thinking is flawed. Gotta get outside the box. I'll poke my AI later and see if I can get it to dump something more interesting.
(DIR) Post #AdYBoIOD0bcqfl9GXw by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-05T23:07:14Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@sirJoho I can confirm this method also works for Bible Verses. It repeats them verbatim as well. I can ask it for the next verses and it reports then as well.At least the AI knows Jesus, lol.This is an example of widely but accurately reported data. Same with Lincolns Speech.
(DIR) Post #AdYFDMyVOg8Dzom1ui by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-05T23:45:23Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@sirJoho I'm using the HuggingFaceH4_zephyr-7b-beta for this. It's built off the Mistral AI series. Running on Obabooga's platform. It's one of the the best performing 7B Parameter Class of LLMs (in my opinion). Wizard is good too though. It can be finicky, so you have to be on your game with the parameters of the "characters". But it will absolutely do what you ask it to do. It's more of a conversational AI though, it's not a good coder. (Use wizard for that).
(DIR) Post #AdYHIpKJc4UDHehmCG by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-06T00:08:46Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@sirJoho The copy of that speech from Lincoln is the Bliss version, just an FYI. It's eeriely close.You're right about the training data, if we had access to ChatGPT4 in the raw, I would bet you it has copy written data in it.It's such a large model that the data is supposed to be probabilistically diluted. So you *should* never see copy written works, but not impossible. The smaller models are problematic because if they DO contain copy written data, it would be much more obvious.
(DIR) Post #AdYiOgf1RYkeuGPRku by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-06T05:12:22Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@DarthRadar It's missing the magnifying glass and the pepper. 🤣
(DIR) Post #Ada2lIfX0FHROnfS2C by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-06T20:35:16Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Sum_ID Only 25MBs short.... 🤣
(DIR) Post #Ada8g9R6VBQ92cqaqO by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-06T21:41:34Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@SouthShoreMasshole Dear God... Touch that up with some Photoshop, it really hits that uncanny valley... Lol
(DIR) Post #AdaUUXCMWidwFsolt2 by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-07T01:45:59Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@jeremiah @GluedToTheScreen Well... Technically if the virgins are all 90 years old, it's essentially the same thing. 🤣
(DIR) Post #Adcar5EFBxAypz2zdw by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-08T02:06:42Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Brycicle 🤣
(DIR) Post #Adcc6ew8oQiHsjZSDo by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-08T02:20:44Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@ghast @Oneeyeking Wow you pissed off the tard from another instance. I like these idiots because they're so easily triggered. Ghast you tard, you have no faith, nothing to stand up for, nothing to stand on. That's why you gotta tear people down.I get it really, really I do.... About as much as I get why my dog eats shit. You just can't help it. It's just instinct to attack/eat what you can't understand.Just disappointing behaviour, ya know?🤣
(DIR) Post #Adhoz0uQoYDzmqy2Fs by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-10T14:38:34Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@commandlinekid Back in the old days before DNS servers were all the rage. We had something called a "hosts file" (it still exists on your system!).It fulfilled the role of DNS, when you got online, you'd go find a copy of this hosts and then use that to get to your website by name and that would keep you in contact if the IP changed for some reason. So this is totally possible to do. The only problem is that if you keep a list, you have to maintain it and if you share it with others...
(DIR) Post #AdhpOwf7E9Q290AVd2 by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-10T14:43:15Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@commandlinekid ...That's what have now, in an over simplistic form. We keep lists and entrust people with authoritative lists using a hierarchy as well. Then we register our entry in the list with that authoritative organization and query it when we want to go some place by name.We could split the Internet and you can pick/run your own DNS and it can go anywhere else, nothing is stopping us from doing both. It's just a list.The Internet sees censorship as damage and will route around it
(DIR) Post #AdhzCptnXuJ9EdtuYi by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-10T16:33:07Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@commandlinekid I clearly haven't had enough coffee.I run my own DNS servers for caching, I find uncensored DNS servers and run those through a domain block list (blocks the obvious garbage). But yeah, you can totally run an unsanctioned DNS server, nothing stopping you.Hell we could setup multiple and share the modified DNS and call it "No Agenda DNS". Could go fancy and setup a little load balancer on AWS to have it direct to a dozen DNS providers anyone wants to run, VMs and VPNs!
(DIR) Post #Adi0Qd87uuphdpkCmG by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-10T16:46:48Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@SirCandinavian @chuchijabrone Wait ... But the news is garbage, the tests are garbage and the bug is garbage...Why do we care again? Just more noise...
(DIR) Post #Adi0wE7URLKLL9VrGK by Fox@noagendasocial.com
2024-01-10T16:52:31Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@SirCandinavian If they haven't heard by now or even questioned anything up to this point what makes anyone think they'll wake up now?It's been what 4 years? People are choosing to live in echo chambers. They're done, unless something really bad happens, go stick a fork in them. That's why there's no quarter, no forgiveness for what these assholes did to the rest of us. They literally don't even care. If they do it's to save their own ass because they're desperate from being injured. 😐