Posts by 74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb@mostr.pub
 (DIR) Post #Az8sVHRw6REPgounOC by 74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb@mostr.pub
       2025-09-29T13:40:07.000Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Man.. you've lost the plot, honestly. Alright, Will, I'll definitely respect your argumentation. Keep going at it for sure. Its the way things should be. My only wish/advice is, you also take an honest look at the reaction from node runners and take that into account as you support a change on core. If you ask me, looking at the reaction from an HONEST point of view, it tells me a substantial amount noderunners disagree with whatever logic you and core devs are presenting. And despite whatever you might think, "a substantial amount of noderunners" disagreeing on a changr should raise serious concerns about that change.
       
 (DIR) Post #Az8seHAsUl8lRVE3Gq by 74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb@mostr.pub
       2025-09-29T13:58:01.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       The "lost the plot" part was directed at the note  I replied to. Obviously all nodes being full nodes is not bad for decentralization. I think/hope your rationale is -- if all nodes HAVE to be full nodes --> there would be fewer full nodes --> which would be bad for decentralisation. But your phrasing is easily misinterpreted to something that sounds like people should prefer to run pruned nodes. Thats the way I read it the first time. My point with respecting the signal from a  substantial amount of noderunners is, since the problem the proposed change seeks to fix and the response is as controversial as it is, no change should be implemented. A better fix should be given time to be thought of.
       
 (DIR) Post #Az8seIO1zLFvCaO4PY by 74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb@mostr.pub
       2025-09-30T07:41:05.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       You get to decide your own semantics, but for yourself only. I'd argue its silly to think pruned node = full node and full node != full archival node. Why have a mode called pruned then!Obviously full node = full archival node and PRUNED NODE IS PRUNED and cannot serve IBD.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2FkLlNDo1xOsllTDk by 74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb@mostr.pub
       2026-01-13T20:15:29.000Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Cuz he is about to make a better track, I'LL FUCKING WAIT.
       
 (DIR) Post #B3NubWcMTSbPPZI9ho by 74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb@mostr.pub
       2026-02-16T14:54:51.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Nah nah man, easy now, ur opsec just aint tight enough. First of all which bank.
       
 (DIR) Post #B3OGPBhEdDmE2d5rZg by 74dc785720571d6bb584e67cadbdd4e4449b91dce5ab31f266ca22eee0b43ccb@mostr.pub
       2026-02-16T20:41:57.000Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Stop leaking what your transaction is about. Think peer to peer. Buy more high end surround sound systems. This is the way.