Post B79gvGSjwhNCOYojPk by protos@tsundere.love
 (DIR) More posts by protos@tsundere.love
 (DIR) Post #B79gvGSjwhNCOYojPk by protos@tsundere.love
       2026-06-09T10:42:14.340646Z
       
       2 likes, 1 repeats
       
       today in total GCC death fuck that kike stallman:src/reich.c:14:88: warning: ‘NIGGER’ redefinedcc1: note: unrecognized command-line option ‘-Wno-macro-redefined’ may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics>fuck you goy undef your macros, the standard says we don't need to allow redefinitions!!
       
 (DIR) Post #B79h0XAHH5u1dzh6XI by HatkeshiatorTND@annihilation.social
       2026-06-09T11:32:03.084134Z
       
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @protos why are you using pp for macros anyway? just write a sexpr frontend and roll your own procedural macros
       
 (DIR) Post #B79mosZaS9mMI4MHC4 by protos@tsundere.love
       2026-06-09T11:40:50.861825Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @HatkeshiatorTND I'm actually currently working on compile time execution&insertion of C in C, these warnings are annoying for the requisite tooling, which is of course in C, and parsers take a quarter of the lines with a few pp hacks, including the one GCC spams me with unsilenceable warnings over when I make the mistake of using it instead of clang.I still like the pp for code deduplication, I hate :soyjak: hygenic macros :soyjak:
       
 (DIR) Post #B79mqI7yvVz9pw7TNo by protos@tsundere.love
       2026-06-09T11:46:25.775094Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @HatkeshiatorTND used it to make a generic hashtable with no indirection that I can trivially serialise into .rodata, and now I can have the code read its own compiler arguments and access -D args without the preprocessor so I can avoid it except for a few stdlib things like stdbool