Post B75oXbxIPG8p6ZVBRI by blitzed@poa.st
(DIR) More posts by blitzed@poa.st
(DIR) Post #B6zmLZOAl0kSoURbRQ by matthew@social.retroedge.tech
2026-06-04T16:44:44.508759Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
Situation Update: A hard line "I don't use anything with LLM generated code" stance will be difficult to maintain if you are a Linux user. #Linux #LLM #AI
(DIR) Post #B6zogGxoekffet7EzA by bpl@snac.bsd.cafe
2026-06-04T17:10:21Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
It is not easy for BSD users too:/
(DIR) Post #B6zolkDpInuDqiDJVQ by matthew@social.retroedge.tech
2026-06-04T17:11:49.062071Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
Agreed. I plan on doing more with NetBSD, but I had decided on that long before the AI generated code issue. NetBSD has a policy that forbids AI generated code from being contributed. #NetBSD #BSD
(DIR) Post #B6zqjsR5zXfaeaepRg by matthew@social.retroedge.tech
2026-06-04T17:33:57.408195Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
Let us know your experience with NetBSD !
(DIR) Post #B6zrVR9giwzPwaC4Ei by matthew@social.retroedge.tech
2026-06-04T17:42:31.027608Z
1 likes, 1 repeats
Yes. Huge increase in LLM assisted commits to the Linux kernel in the last four months. Note: I do not have a hard line stance against AI generated code, but I am suspicious and cautious when it comes to "AI". So I will keep using Linux... but I'm not thrilled about the huge increase in AI code commits to the kernel.
(DIR) Post #B6zrwlaAssin7Hc8hs by jeremiah@shitposter.world
2026-06-04T17:47:31.620616Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@matthew @bpl @wbrawner i wish someone would finish minix3.
(DIR) Post #B6ztXGgioNdBy4e6HA by bpl@snac.bsd.cafe
2026-06-04T18:04:47Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
AI in kernel/base system in one thing, AI in additional software is another and the room for alternatives is getting smaller.
(DIR) Post #B70Ycehf30NW1Bly1w by matthew@social.retroedge.tech
2026-06-05T01:45:21.395760Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
I think it is wise that NetBSD used that language. If there's a yet unforeseen reason why it would be important to use some LLM code, they can give permission to accept just specifically that code. It allows them to take and stance, but not paint themselves in a corner.
(DIR) Post #B7181d9NSHempxNgyu by bpl@snac.bsd.cafe
2026-06-05T08:19:43Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Well, NetBSD removed that unfortunate tmux slop code (at least I was not able to find it in the source code). That's my opinion - NetBSD says "no with loophole" and remove LLM code from source, OpenBSD says "no" and there is no interest to remove that stuff from their tmux. BUT I still give Fish Linux benefit of doubt because there are more examples of rejecting LLM code than inheriting it. In terms of (my) trust Net is a level higher than Open and both are much higher than Linux. Policies can be changed, so I think that the only thing which we left with is a trust.CC: @rl_dane@polymaths.social
(DIR) Post #B75oXbxIPG8p6ZVBRI by blitzed@poa.st
2026-06-07T05:13:18.685237Z
2 likes, 1 repeats
I have a Commodore Amiga 4000 with Motorola 68040 CPU, too bad it lacks the prerequisite 24MB of RAM required to install NetBSD LOL It would require using a heat gun to desolder a chip to replace with a newer revision, in order to allow usage of an aftermarket RAM expansion card. Perhaps it can be a fun project some day if I practice such skills on e-waste first. Until then I will try tinkering with NetBSD on one of my extra PC's :)
(DIR) Post #B75qzGJieOa80mIqiO by jeremiah@shitposter.world
2026-06-07T15:05:02.348946Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@blitzed @bpl @matthew I don't know if AMIX runs on a 4000/040, but i know they JUST released a new update (3.3) for classic AmigaOS:https://www.generationamiga.com/2026/03/28/amigaos-3-2-vs-amigaos-3-3-whats-new-in-the-next-evolution-of-the-classic-amiga-os/4000/040 sat next to a NeXT on my desk until it was replaced with a PowerMac, and the NeXT gave way to to a OS X machine.
(DIR) Post #B76scMFeoXzmp5ZLou by blitzed@poa.st
2026-06-07T19:43:41.905571Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
yeah dunno WTH they are doin...I have an OLD AmigaOS v3.5 on my machine, and my friend runs AmigaOS v3.9 on his highend fully stacked Amiga 4000T :)